I can see your point here, and I think your suggestion makes sense.
If a casino considers certain low-risk betting strategies unacceptable, it would certainly be more transparent to exclude those bets from contributing to the wagering requirements or clearly restrict them in advance, rather than relying on a broad rule that could potentially be used to confiscate winnings.
Of course, the circumstances matter. There is a difference between deliberately exploiting a bonus and simply playing in a way that a player might not even realize is considered problematic.
I'm curious, though. Have you personally experienced an issue with this particular rule at Lucky Owl Club Casino, or is this something you noticed while reviewing their terms and conditions?
