Kasino: 1 gevinst
Problem: Bonusgevinster konfiskeret uden en klar regel
Jeg indbetalte 5.000 KZT og modtog en bonus på 30% (1.500 KZT).
Min indbetalingssaldo var tabt, hvorefter jeg fortsatte med at spille med bonussaldoen.
Under spillet faldt min bonussaldo til cirka 300 KZT. Jeg placerede et væddemål med de resterende bonusmidler og vandt 12.600 KZT.
Gevinsterne blev dog ikke krediteret. I stedet blev bonussen markeret som annulleret.
Casinoet hævder, at bonussen var "tabt", fordi omsætningskravene ikke var opfyldt, og fordi hele bonussaldoen blev brugt i et enkelt væddemål.
På tidspunktet for deltagelse indeholdt bonusvilkårene dog IKKE nogen regel om, at:
• forbyder brug af den fulde bonussaldo i ét væddemål (all-in),
• angiver, at et vindende væddemål kan betragtes som et "tab",
• angiver, at gevinster fra et vellykket væddemål annulleres, hvis indsatsen er ufuldstændig.
Casinosupporten oplyser gentagne gange, at "bonusbalancen var tabt", på trods af at det faktiske resultat af indsatsen var en gevinst, ikke et tab.
De kunne ikke angive nogen specifik regel, der tillader at behandle et vindende væddemål som et tabende væddemål eller konfiskere gevinsterne i denne situation.
Jeg mener, at casinoet anvendte en ikke-udtalt eller tilbagevirkende regel og fejlfortolkede begrebet "tab" for at retfærdiggøre konfiskation.
Ønsket løsning:
Kreditér gevinsterne fra det succesfulde væddemål, eller angiv en klar henvisning til en specifik bonusregel, der eksplicit tillader en sådan konfiskation.
Casinoet undlod at fremlægge en konkret regelhenvisning trods flere anmodninger.
Casino: 1win
Issue: Bonus winnings confiscated without a clear rule
I deposited 5,000 KZT and received a 30% bonus (1,500 KZT).
My deposit balance was lost, after which I continued playing with the bonus balance.
During gameplay, my bonus balance decreased to approximately 300 KZT. I placed a bet using the remaining bonus funds and won 12,600 KZT.
However, the winnings were not credited. Instead, the bonus was marked as annulled.
The casino claims that the bonus was "lost" because the wagering requirements were not completed and because the entire bonus balance was used in a single bet.
However, at the time of participation, the bonus terms did NOT contain any rule that:
• prohibits using the full bonus balance in one bet (all-in),
• states that a winning bet can be considered a "loss",
• states that winnings from a successful bet are annulled if wagering is incomplete.
The casino support repeatedly states that the "bonus balance was lost", despite the fact that the actual result of the bet was a win, not a loss.
They were unable to provide any specific rule that allows treating a winning bet as a losing one or confiscating the winnings in this situation.
I believe the casino applied an unstated or retroactive rule and misinterpreted the concept of "loss" to justify confiscation.
Requested resolution:
Credit the winnings obtained from the successful bet or provide a clear reference to a specific bonus rule that explicitly allows such confiscation.
The casino failed to provide a concrete rule reference despite multiple requests.
Automatisk oversættelse: