Kære BOHO Casino,
Tak for din præcisering og forklaringen af den metode, der bruges til at beregne refusionen.
Efter at have gennemgået transaktionshistorikken er jeg ikke overbevist om, at det faktisk er den mest fordelagtige fremgangsmåde for spilleren at bruge perioden fra den 16. marts.
Den 17. marts hævede spilleren i alt 35.000 NOK. Hvis man inkluderer indbetalinger foretaget før denne betydelige hævning, udlignes senere tab effektivt med gevinster, der allerede var blevet hævet lovligt. Fra vores perspektiv sætter dette spilleren i en mindre gunstig snarere end en bedre position, da det i bund og grund straffer ham for at have vundet og hævet penge, før kontoen blev genåbnet.
Kerneproblemet i denne klage er, at spillerens konto blev genåbnet på trods af hans tidligere anmodning om en spillerelateret begrænsning. Da kontoen blev tilgængelig igen den 14. maj, kunne spilleren fortsætte med at spille indtil den 19. maj.
Ifølge transaktionshistorikken indbetalte spilleren 31.842,45 NOK i denne periode og hævede 5.000 NOK. Derfor forekommer det mere passende at vurdere refusionen udelukkende baseret på den aktivitet, der fandt sted efter kontoen blev genåbnet, da dette repræsenterer den periode, hvor casinoets ansvarlige spilforanstaltninger mislykkedes.
Baseret på disse tal ville spillerens nettotab for den relevante periode beløbe sig til 26.842,45 NOK (31.842,45 NOK i indbetalinger minus hævningen på 5.000 NOK).
Kunne du venligst gennemgå denne fremgangsmåde og fortælle os, om du ville være villig til at genoverveje refusionsbeløbet på dette grundlag? Vi mener, at denne metode mere præcist afspejler de direkte konsekvenser af en genåbning af kontoen og undgår at udligne tab med hævninger, der fandt sted før genåbningen.
Dear BOHO Casino,
Thank you for your clarification and for explaining the methodology used to calculate the refund.
After reviewing the transaction history, I am not convinced that using the period starting from March 16 is actually the more favorable approach for the player.
On March 17, the player successfully withdrew a total of 35,000 NOK. Including deposits made before this significant withdrawal effectively offsets later losses with winnings that had already been legitimately withdrawn. From our perspective, this places the player in a less favorable position rather than a better one, as it essentially penalizes him for having won and withdrawn funds before the account was reopened.
The core issue in this complaint is that the player's account was reopened despite his previous request for a gambling-related restriction. Once the account became accessible again on May 14, the player was able to continue gambling until May 19.
According to the transaction history, the player deposited 31,842.45 NOK during this period and made a withdrawal of 5,000 NOK. Therefore, it appears more appropriate to assess the refund based solely on the activity that occurred after the account was reopened, as this represents the period during which the casino's responsible gambling measures failed.
Based on these figures, the player's net loss for the relevant period would amount to 26,842.45 NOK (31,842.45 NOK in deposits minus the 5,000 NOK withdrawal).
Could you please review this approach and let us know whether you would be willing to reconsider the refund amount on this basis? We believe this methodology more accurately reflects the direct consequences of the account being reopened and avoids offsetting losses with withdrawals that occurred prior to the reopening.
Automatisk oversættelse: