Kære Eksil,
Tak for dit svar. Du har rejst flere fornuftige punkter.
Kære BuffBets Casino,
Tak for dit svar og din e-mail. Jeg har svaret tilbage.
Jeg anerkender fuldt ud den relevante regel og bekræfter, at spillere, som et standardkrav i branchen og i henhold til reglerne, ikke må indsende ugyldige, ændrede, redigerede eller forfalskede dokumenter under verifikationsprocessen. Vi hos Casino Guru respekterer og støtter fuldt ud dette princip.
Når det er sagt, ser det i dette specifikke tilfælde ud til, at spilleren muligvis har ændret dokumentet udelukkende fordi deres fulde navn ikke var vist på den originale ING-kontoudtog, snarere end med den hensigt at vildlede verifikationsprocessen eller skjule deres identitet. Spilleren informerede dig endda om dette på en transparent måde.
Spilleren har også forsøgt at fremlægge yderligere dokumenter i deres originale, uredigerede form, og som nævnt ovenfor er han fortsat villig til at gennemgå et videobekræftelsesopkald for at bekræfte sin identitet. Disse faktorer synes yderligere at modsige den potentielle antagelse om, at der var en hensigt om at vildlede verifikationsprocessen eller skjule sin identitet.
Jeg vil derfor kraftigt opfordre dig til at tage disse omstændigheder i betragtning, når du revurderer sagen.
Jeg håber fortsat, at vi kan finde en rimelig løsning på denne situation til gensidig tilfredshed for alle involverede parter.
Dear Exileeee,
Thank you for your response. You have raised several reasonable points.
Dear BuffBets Casino,
Thank you for your response and your email. I have responded back.
I fully acknowledge the relevant rule and confirm that, as a standard industry and compliance requirement, players are not permitted to submit invalid, altered, edited or falsified documents during the verification process. We at Casino Guru fully respect and support this principle.
That being said, in this particular case, it appears the player may have modified the document solely because their full name was not displayed on the original ING bank statement, rather than with the intention of misleading the verification process or concealing their identity. The player even informed you about this transparently.
The player has also attempted to provide additional documents in their original, unedited form and, as mentioned above, remains willing to undergo a video verification call to confirm their identity. These factors further appear to contradict the potential assumption that there was an intention to mislead the verification process or conceal their identity.
I would therefore strongly encourage you to take these circumstances into consideration when reassessing the matter.
I remain hopeful that we can still find a reasonable way to resolve this situation to the mutual satisfaction of all parties involved.
Automatisk oversættelse: