The player from Japan had deposited approximately $10,000 and won $19,500 after meeting the play requirements, but his winnings were confiscated for an unclear reason. Despite confirmation from the support team that only 1x wagering was needed, the player lost his winnings and sought clarification. The Complaints Team had engaged with the casino regarding the confiscation, emphasizing the need for fair gambling practices and suggesting that raising wagering requirements would have been a more appropriate response than confiscation. The casino maintained its stance, stating that the decision had been based on its AML policies, and the complaint was ultimately rejected after the regulatory body ruled in favor of the casino.
Spilleren fra Japan havde indbetalt cirka $10.000 og vundet $19.500 efter at have opfyldt spillekravene, men hans gevinster blev konfiskeret af en uklar årsag. På trods af bekræftelse fra supportteamet om, at der kun var behov for 1x indsats, mistede spilleren sine gevinster og søgte en afklaring. Klageteamet havde talt med kasinoet vedrørende konfiskationen og understregede behovet for fair spilpraksis og antydede, at en forhøjelse af indsatskravene ville have været et mere passende svar end konfiskation. Kasinoet fastholdt sin holdning og anførte, at beslutningen var baseret på dets AML-politikker, og klagen blev i sidste ende afvist, efter at tilsynsorganet afgjorde til fordel for kasinoet.