Jeg indsender en formel klage vedrørende min oplevelse med GLBET9 og afvisningen af at behandle min udbetaling efter legitimt spil.
Jeg indbetalte penge på platformen via PayID og spillede et JILI-spil i god tro. Under min spilsession vandt jeg cirka $3300 og indsendte en udbetalingsanmodning via platformen.
Efter at have anmodet om udbetalingen, blev jeg gentagne gange informeret af kundesupport om, at min udbetaling var under behandling, og at forsinkelserne skyldtes, at det finansielle team håndterede andre betalinger før min. Jeg blev flere gange bedt om at være tålmodig, mens udbetalingen ventede.
Efter først at have bekræftet, at udbetalingen var under behandling, ændrede platformen dog senere sin holdning og begyndte at give modstridende forklaringer på afvisningen af betaling. Disse forklaringer omfattede:
"flere væddemål placeres på samme tid"
"flere logins"
"Uregelmæssig spilleaktivitet"
"Udbydersystemets regler"
Selvom jeg flere gange har bedt om at få afklaret, har jeg aldrig fået følgende:
en detaljeret spillog
bevis for enhver faktisk regelovertrædelse
en forklaring på, hvordan samtidige væddemål angiveligt fandt sted
bekræftelse af flere enheder eller uautoriseret adgang
den præcise udbyderregel eller -politik, der er overtrådt
Jeg tilgik platformen via Google Chrome på min personlige enhed og har muligvis haft flere browserfaner åbne under spillet. At have flere faner åbne betyder dog ikke, at der bevidst eller samtidigt er blevet placeret flere væddemål.
Supportens forklaringer ændrede sig gentagne gange under tvisten, på trods af tidligere forsikringer om, at min tilbagetrækning allerede var under behandling. Denne uoverensstemmelse har givet anledning til alvorlige bekymringer vedrørende gennemsigtighed, retfærdighed og legitimiteten af afslagsbeslutningen.
Jeg har gemt skærmbilleder og optegnelser, herunder:
Spilhistorik og indsatshistorik
udbetalingsanmodninger
beskeder, der bekræftede, at udbetalingen var under behandling
senere afslagsbeskeder med modstridende årsager
optegnelser over indbetalingstransaktioner
Jeg anmoder om:
En fuld gennemgang af min sag
En detaljeret forklaring af den påståede uregelmæssige aktivitet
En komplet gameplay- og transaktionslog for den omstridte session
Genovervejelse af det tilbageholdte hævningsbeløb
Jeg mener, at jeg handlede legitimt under hele spillet, og jeg er dybt bekymret over manglen på gennemsigtighed omkring denne beslutning.
Tak for din opmærksomhed på denne sag.
I am submitting a formal complaint regarding my experience with GLBET9 and the refusal to process my withdrawal after legitimate gameplay.
I deposited funds into the platform via PayID and played a JILI game in good faith. During my gameplay session, I won approximately $3300 and submitted a withdrawal request through the platform.
After requesting the withdrawal, I was repeatedly advised by customer support that my payout was being processed and that delays were due to the financial team handling other payments before mine. I was told multiple times to remain patient while the withdrawal was pending.
However, after initially confirming the withdrawal was processing, the platform later reversed its position and began providing inconsistent explanations for refusing payment. These explanations included:
"multiple bets being placed at the same time"
"multiple logins"
"irregular game activity"
"provider system rules"
Despite requesting clarification several times, I was never provided with:
a detailed gameplay log
evidence of any actual rule violation
an explanation of how simultaneous bets allegedly occurred
confirmation of multiple devices or unauthorized access
the exact provider rule or policy breached
I accessed the platform through Google Chrome on my personal device and may have had multiple browser tabs open during gameplay. However, having multiple tabs open does not mean multiple bets were intentionally or simultaneously placed.
The explanations provided by support changed repeatedly throughout the dispute, despite earlier assurances that my withdrawal was already being processed. This inconsistency has raised serious concerns regarding transparency, fairness, and the legitimacy of the refusal decision.
I have retained screenshots and records including:
gameplay and bet history
withdrawal requests
messages confirming the withdrawal was processing
later denial messages with conflicting reasons
deposit transaction records
I am requesting:
A full review of my case
A detailed explanation of the alleged irregular activity
A complete gameplay and transaction log for the disputed session
Reconsideration of the withheld withdrawal amount
I believe I acted legitimately throughout gameplay and I am deeply concerned by the lack of transparency surrounding this decision.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Automatisk oversættelse: