Kære lili41,
Casinoteamet har givet mig visse oplysninger og beviser, der rejser gyldige spørgsmål, som delvist kan afklare deres handlinger. Trods mine gentagne anmodninger har casinoteamet dog ikke leveret de yderligere oplysninger og beviser, der er nødvendige for, at jeg kan foretage en uafhængig og grundig vurdering af situationen.
Derfor kan vi i øjeblikket ikke støtte casinoets handlinger, og det ser ud til, at konfiskationen af dine gevinster er uberettiget på nuværende tidspunkt.
Ifølge oplysningerne fra casinoet blev din konto markeret af deres sikkerhedsteam for brug af proxy-IP-adresser, hvilket er forbudt i henhold til regel 12.10, som tidligere meddelt dig af casinoet.
Fra vores perspektiv hos Casino Guru synes den hidtil fremlagte begrundelse dog ikke at være tilstrækkeligt underbygget til at retfærdiggøre en så betydelig handling som konfiskation af gevinster. Især er der ikke fremlagt beviser for, at brugen af proxy-IP-adresser resulterede i nogen urimelig fordel eller anden adfærd, der væsentligt ville begrunde alvoren af den trufne handling.
IP-adresserne blev højst sandsynligt tildelt dig af din internetudbyder, da du som kunde ikke har nogen indflydelse på dette. Mens spillere kan administrere deres brug af VPN'er (hvis dette var tilfældet, men det er det IKKE), konfigureres proxy-IP'er af internetudbyderen (ISP), selv uden spillerens viden, hvilket gør det uretfærdigt for casinoet at straffe dig for noget uden for din kontrol.
Jeg har meddelt casinoteamet vores holdning til sådanne sager og givet vores indsigt i, hvordan en sådan situation kan håndteres, men desværre har de fastholdt deres oprindelige holdning. Desværre har vi intet andet valg end at betragte denne klage som lukket som uløst - imod fair gambling .
Jeg forstår, at dette ikke er det resultat, du havde håbet på, men vi mener, at faldet i casinoets vurdering på grund af uløste klager kan tilskynde dem til at revurdere deres tilgang. Hvis casinoet vælger at reagere og løse sagen, vil vi genåbne din klage og give dig besked via e-mail.
Jeg håber virkelig, at spillemyndigheden vil gennemgå din sag og potentielt tilslutte sig vores synspunkt. Afhængigt af resultatet af deres vurdering kan de være i stand til at anfægte casinoets beslutning eller opfordre til yderligere gennemgang af sagen. Dette falder dog langt ud over vores muligheder og beføjelser.
Fremadrettet kan jeg kun anbefale at gennemgå et casinos omdømme, licenser og spillerfeedback omhyggeligt, inden man tilmelder sig, og at vælge vellicenserede og højt vurderede operatører for at reducere risikoen for lignende situationer i fremtiden.
Jeg beklager, at jeg ikke kunne være til mere hjælp i denne sag.
Med venlig hilsen,
Mikal
Casino Guru
Dear lili41,
The casino team has provided me with certain information and evidence that raises valid questions, which may partially clarify their actions. However, despite my repeated requests, the casino team has not supplied the additional information and evidence necessary for me to conduct an independent and thorough assessment of the situation.
Consequently, we are currently unable to support the casino’s actions, and it appears that the confiscation of your winnings is unjustified at this time.
According to the information provided by the casino, your account was flagged by its security team for the use of proxy IP addresses, which is prohibited under Rule 12.10, as previously communicated to you by the casino.
However, from our perspective at Casino Guru, the reasoning provided so far does not appear sufficiently substantiated to justify such a significant action as the confiscation of winnings. In particular, no evidence has been presented to us indicating that the use of proxy IP addresses resulted in any unfair advantage, or other conduct that would materially justify the severity of the action taken.
The IPs were most likely assigned to you by your internet provider, as you, as a customer, have no influence over this. While players can manage their use of VPNs (if this were the case, but it is NOT), proxy IPs are configured by the ISP (Internet Service Provider) even without the player's knowledge, making it unjust for the casino to penalize you for something beyond your control.
I have conveyed our stance on such matters to the casino team and provided our insight on how such a situation could be handled, but regrettably, they have maintained their original position. Unfortunately, we are left with no choice but to consider this complaint closed as Unresolved—Against Fair Gambling.
I understand that this is not the outcome you were hoping for, but we believe that the decrease in the casino’s rating due to unresolved complaints may encourage them to reassess their approach. Should the casino choose to respond and resolve the matter, we will reopen your complaint and notify you via email.
I do hope the gaming authority will review your case and potentially align with our view. Depending on the outcome of their assessment, they may be in a position to challenge the casino’s decision or encourage further review of the matter. However, this falls well beyond our capabilities and authority.
Going forward, I can only recommend carefully reviewing a casino’s reputation, licensing, and player feedback before signing up, and choosing well-licensed and highly rated operators to reduce the risk of similar situations in the future.
I am sorry that I could not be of more assistance in this matter.
Best regards,
Michal
Casino Guru
Automatisk oversættelse: