Hej Lucia,
Tak for muligheden for at svare.
Efter at have gennemgået operatørens svar, bestrider jeg fortsat deres version af hændelsesforløbet og beder respektfuldt om, at en række vigtige uoverensstemmelser afklares.
For det første oplyser operatøren, at mine tre udbetalinger blev annulleret, og at €1.200 blev tilbageført til min saldo kl. 08:50 UTC. Det skærmbillede, de har fremlagt, ser dog ud til at forbinde saldoforøgelsen med spilindtastningerne omkring kl. 08:30 UTC i stedet for 08:50 UTC. Dette virker uforeneligt med den skriftlige tidslinje, de har fremlagt. Jeg beder derfor operatøren om at fremlægge det komplette revisionsspor, der viser det nøjagtige annulleringstidspunkt for hver udbetaling og det nøjagtige tidsstempel for tilbagebetalingen af €1.200.
Jeg bemærker også, at dette adskiller sig fra den forklaring, jeg tidligere fik fra supporten, hvor jeg blev informeret om, at pengene var blevet returneret, mens jeg spillede Mythology Zeus. Forklaringen, der nu præsenteres for Casino Guru, antyder i stedet, at jeg stoppede med at spille, udbetalingerne blev annulleret, og jeg genoptog senere spillet. Jeg beder operatøren om at præcisere den korrekte rækkefølge af begivenhederne og fremlægge de dokumenter, der understøtter dette.
Vigtigere er det, at operatøren stadig ikke har forklaret, hvem der annullerede hævningerne. Jeg annullerede dem bestemt ikke. Hvis operatøren annullerede dem, beder jeg dem om at forklare, hvem der godkendte disse annulleringer, hvorfor de blev annulleret, under hvilken politik eller vilkår de blev annulleret, og hvordan jeg blev underrettet om, at dette var sket.
Operatørens tidslinje er også vanskelig at forene med den kommunikation, jeg modtog fra deres KYC-team.
Jeg modtog en e-mail, der informerede mig om, at min udbetaling var sat på pause i afventning af færdiggørelsen af KYC-verifikationen. Jeg gennemførte derefter den anmodede verifikation og blev efterfølgende bedt om at bekræfte min udbetalingskonto. Disse meddelelser indikerede tydeligt for mig, at udbetalingsprocessen stadig var i gang.
Hvis udbetalingerne, som operatøren nu anfører, allerede var blevet annulleret og pengene tilbageført til min saldo før disse meddelelser, beder jeg respektfuldt operatøren om at forklare:
Hvorfor blev jeg informeret om, at min udbetaling var sat på pause i afventning af bekræftelse?
Hvorfor blev jeg efterfølgende bedt om at bekræfte min udbetalingskonto, hvis der ikke længere var en ventende udbetaling?
Hvorfor informerede operatøren mig aldrig om, at mine udbetalinger allerede var blevet annulleret og returneret?
Efter KYC-processen modtog jeg ikke bekræftelse på, at min konto var blevet verificeret, eller at mine udbetalinger var blevet annulleret. Jeg blev blot informeret om, at der ikke var behov for yderligere dokumenter. Den sande status for mine udbetalinger blev på intet tidspunkt tydeligt kommunikeret.
Jeg vil også gerne påpege, at efter KYC-restriktionen blev indført, havde jeg ikke længere adgang til udbetalingssektionen på min konto. Før dette kunne jeg se mine ventende udbetalinger. Efter at restriktionen blev indført, havde jeg ingen indsigt i deres status og ingen mulighed for at vide, om de stadig var ventende, var blevet annulleret eller var blevet returneret. Jeg stolede derfor udelukkende på operatørens kommunikation, som fortsat indikerede, at min udbetaling var underlagt verifikation.
Under hele sagen sendte jeg gentagne e-mails til operatøren og spurgte, hvor mine €1.200 var blevet af, hvornår mine udbetalinger ville blive behandlet, og anmodede om min spilhistorik, transaktionshistorik, annulleringshistorik og kontorevisionslogfiler. Jeg indsendte også en DSAR med anmodning om mine kontooplysninger. Ingen af disse anmodninger modtog noget meningsfuldt svar eller bekræftelse. Den detaljerede forklaring og det begrænsede skærmbillede er først blevet produceret, efter at Casino Guru blev involveret.
Hvis dette altid har været operatørens forklaring, spørger jeg respektfuldt, hvorfor ingen af disse oplysninger blev givet, når jeg gentagne gange anmodede om dem direkte. Hvis operatøren blot havde svaret med de relevante optegnelser på det tidspunkt, kunne en stor del af denne tvist have været løst for måneder siden.
Endelig vil jeg med respekt indrømme, at det begrænsede skærmbillede, der er fremlagt, efter min mening ikke er tilstrækkeligt til uafhængigt at verificere operatørens rekonstruktion af begivenhederne. Det er et beskåret uddrag snarere end et komplet revisionsspor for regnskabet.
Af disse grunde anmoder jeg venligst operatøren om at fremlægge:
De komplette revisionslogfiler for min konto.
Det nøjagtige annulleringstidsstempel for hver udbetaling.
Det nøjagtige tidsstempel for genkreditten på €1.200.
Den komplette saldohistorik før og efter den påståede genkreditering.
Den fulde spilhistorik og sessionslogfiler, der dækker den relevante periode.
Bekræftelse af, hvem der annullerede udbetalingerne, og hvordan jeg blev underrettet.
Min holdning har været den samme hele vejen igennem. Jeg bestrider operatørens version af begivenhederne, hvilket netop er grunden til, at jeg gentagne gange har anmodet om de underliggende optegnelser. Disse optegnelser blev ikke udleveret før denne sag, på trods af mine talrige anmodninger.
Tak for din fortsatte hjælp.
Hi Lucia,
Thank you for the opportunity to respond.
Having reviewed the operator's response, I continue to dispute their version of events and respectfully ask that a number of important discrepancies be clarified.
Firstly, the operator states that my three withdrawals were cancelled and €1,200 was recredited to my balance at 08:50 UTC. However, the screenshot they have provided appears to associate the balance increase with the gameplay entries at approximately 08:30 UTC, rather than 08:50 UTC. This appears inconsistent with the written timeline they have provided. I therefore ask that the operator provide the complete audit trail showing the exact cancellation time of each withdrawal and the exact timestamp of the €1,200 recredit.
I also note that this differs from the explanation previously given to me by support, where I was advised the funds had been returned while I was playing Mythology Zeus. The explanation now presented to Casino Guru instead suggests that I stopped playing, the withdrawals were cancelled, and I later resumed play. I ask that the operator clarify the correct sequence of events and provide the records supporting it.
More importantly, the operator has still not explained who cancelled the withdrawals. I certainly did not cancel them. If the operator cancelled them, I ask that they explain who authorised those cancellations, why they were cancelled, under what policy or terms they were cancelled, and how I was notified that this had happened.
The operator's timeline is also difficult to reconcile with the communications I received from their KYC team.
I received an email advising that my withdrawal was on hold pending completion of KYC verification. I then completed the requested verification and was subsequently asked to confirm my withdrawal account. Those communications clearly indicated to me that the withdrawal process was still ongoing.
If, as the operator now states, the withdrawals had already been cancelled and the funds returned to my balance before those communications, I respectfully ask the operator to explain:
Why was I informed that my withdrawal was on hold pending verification?
Why was I subsequently asked to confirm my withdrawal account if there was no longer a pending withdrawal?
Why did the operator never inform me that my withdrawals had already been cancelled and returned?
Following the KYC process, I did not receive confirmation that my account had been successfully verified or that my withdrawals had been cancelled. I was simply informed that no further documents were required. At no point was the true status of my withdrawals clearly communicated.
I would also like to point out that once the KYC restriction was applied, I no longer had access to the withdrawal section of my account. Prior to this I could view my pending withdrawals. After the restriction was applied, I had no visibility of their status and no means of knowing whether they remained pending, had been cancelled or had been returned. I therefore relied entirely on the operator's communications, all of which continued to indicate that my withdrawal was subject to verification.
Throughout this matter I repeatedly emailed the operator asking where my €1,200 had gone, when my withdrawals would be processed, and requesting my gameplay history, transaction history, cancellation records and account audit logs. I also submitted a DSAR requesting my account records. None of these requests received any meaningful response or acknowledgement. The detailed explanation and limited screenshot have only been produced after Casino Guru became involved.
If this has always been the operator's explanation, I respectfully ask why none of this information was provided when I repeatedly requested it directly. Had the operator simply responded with the relevant records at the time, much of this dispute could have been addressed months ago.
Finally, I respectfully submit that the limited screenshot provided is not, in my view, sufficient to independently verify the operator's reconstruction of events. It is a cropped extract rather than a complete account audit trail.
For these reasons, I respectfully request that the operator provide:
The complete audit logs for my account.
The exact cancellation timestamp for each withdrawal.
The exact timestamp of the €1,200 recredit.
The complete balance history before and after the alleged recredit.
The full gameplay history and session logs covering the relevant period.
Confirmation of who cancelled the withdrawals and how I was notified.
My position has remained consistent throughout. I dispute the operator's version of events, which is precisely why I repeatedly requested the underlying records. Those records were not provided until these proceedings, despite my numerous requests.
Thank you for your continued assistance.
Automatisk oversættelse: