Hej alle sammen,
Kære Raul45,
Tak for de yderligere dokumenter, du har fremlagt, og for at du har taget dig tid til at forklare din holdning. Jeg har gennemgået de materialer, du har indsendt. Jeg anser dem dog desværre ikke for relevante nok til at ændre vurderingen af denne klage.
Især synes de dokumenter, du har fremlagt, ikke at være fra den periode, der er relevant for de omstridte begivenheder, så de fastslår ikke, hvad de gældende bonusbetingelser var, eller hvordan den maksimale udbetalingsgrænse blev præsenteret for dig på det tidspunkt, hvor bonussen blev aktiveret og spillet.
Beviserne fra Mr Bet Casino inkluderer derimod et skærmbillede af din livechat med deres support fra 17. april 2026 kl. 20:12 , som er direkte forbundet med den pågældende bonus.
I den samtale spurgte du specifikt om betingelserne for maksimale gevinster . Casinoets support forklarede tydeligt, at det maksimale udbetalingsbeløb var 400.000 CLP , bestående af:
- 200.000 CLP fra bonusgevinsterne , og
- 200.000 CLP fra gratis spins , hvor gratis spins-delen består af to grupper af 50 gratis spins, hver med en maksimal udbetaling på 100.000 CLP .
Supporten spurgte derefter eksplicit, om du ønskede bonussen krediteret, og du bekræftede, at du ønskede det. Du kommenterede efterfølgende:
"Jeg tror ikke engang, jeg vinder 10.000 hahaha"
Dette er især relevant, fordi det viser, at de maksimale udbetalingsbetingelser blev diskuteret med dig , før bonussen blev krediteret , i stedet for at casinoet først indførte disse betingelser, efter du havde opfyldt omsætningskravene.
Casinoet leverede også et skærmbillede, der viste, hvordan bonussen blev vist på spillerens konto, hvor den gældende maksimale udbetalingsbetingelse også tydeligt er angivet:

Vedrørende spilhistorikken forklarede casinoet, at deres system kun gemmer spillehistorikken i tre måneder. Derfor var hverken casinoet eller du i stand til at fremlægge den komplette spilhistorik for den omstridte periode. Selvom jeg ville have foretrukket at gennemgå disse optegnelser, ugyldiggør deres fravær efter min mening ikke de andre tilgængelige samtidige beviser.
Vigtigst af alt er live chat-beviserne direkte forbundet med den relevante bonus og viser, at du blev informeret om betingelserne for maksimale gevinster og udtrykkeligt accepterede at modtage bonussen bagefter.
Baseret på de beviser, jeg har til rådighed, anser jeg derfor casinoets forklaring for tilstrækkeligt underbygget til at afslutte denne klage.
Jeg vil derfor afslutte denne klage som afvist.
Tak igen for de beviser og oplysninger, du har fremlagt under undersøgelsen. Jeg forstår, at du er uenig i casinoets holdning, men baseret på den dokumentation, jeg har til rådighed, kan jeg ikke med rimelighed konkludere, at casinoet anvendte en ikke-offentliggjort maksimal udbetalingsbetingelse eller handlede uretfærdigt i denne sag.
Tak til jer begge for jeres samarbejde.
Med venlig hilsen,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Hello everyone,
Dear Raul45,
thank you for the additional documents you provided and for taking the time to explain your position. I have reviewed the materials you submitted. However, unfortunately, I do not consider them relevant enough to change the assessment of this complaint.
In particular, the documents you provided do not appear to be from the period relevant to the disputed events, so they do not establish what the applicable bonus conditions were or how the maximum withdrawal limit was presented to you at the time the bonus was activated and played.
The evidence provided by Mr Bet Casino, on the other hand, includes a screenshot of your live chat with their support from 17 April 2026 at 20:12, which is directly connected to the bonus in question.
In that conversation, you specifically asked about the maximum winnings conditions. The casino's support clearly explained that the maximum withdrawal was 400,000 CLP, consisting of:
- 200,000 CLP from the bonus winnings, and
- 200,000 CLP from the Free Spins, with the Free Spins portion consisting of two batches of 50 Free Spins, each with a maximum withdrawal of 100,000 CLP.
The support then explicitly asked whether you wanted the bonus to be credited, and you confirmed that you did. You subsequently commented:
"I don't think I'll even win 10,000 hahaha"
This is particularly relevant because it demonstrates that the maximum withdrawal conditions were discussed with you before the bonus was credited, rather than the casino introducing these conditions only after you had completed the wagering requirements.
The casino also provided a screenshot showing how the bonus was displayed on the player's account, where the applicable maximum withdrawal condition is also clearly stated:

Regarding the gameplay history, the casino explained that its system retains betting history for only three months. Therefore, neither the casino nor you were able to provide the complete gameplay history for the disputed period. While I would have preferred to review those records, their absence does not, in my view, invalidate the other contemporaneous evidence available.
Most importantly, the live chat evidence is directly connected to the relevant bonus and demonstrates that you were informed about the maximum winnings conditions and explicitly agreed to receive the bonus afterwards.
Based on the evidence available to me, I therefore consider the casino's explanation sufficiently supported to conclude this complaint.
I will consequently close this complaint as rejected.
Thank you again for the evidence and information you provided throughout the investigation. I understand that you disagree with the casino's position, but based on the documentation available to me, I cannot reasonably conclude that the casino applied an undisclosed maximum withdrawal condition or acted unfairly in this matter.
Thank you both for your cooperation.
Best regards,
Samuel
Casino Guru
Automatisk oversættelse: