Kære Tina1414,
Tak for din tålmodighed, mens jeg gennemgik din sag grundigt.
Casino Guru har opbevaret en arkiveret kopi af casinoets vilkår, og vi har den version af Realz Casinos generelle vilkår, der var gældende kort før og på tidspunktet for dit spil. Jeg baserede min beslutning på denne arkiverede version, ikke på vilkår introduceret efterfølgende eller på interne kampagnebetingelser, der ikke viste sig at have været tilgængelige for dig.
Den komplette spilhistorik fra casinoet bekræfter, at gevinsten på 60.000 NZD fandt sted, mens din gratis spins-bonus stadig var aktiv, og omsætningskravene endnu ikke var opfyldt. Gevinsterne blev derfor krediteret din bonussaldo i stedet for din ubegrænsede saldo med rigtige penge. Omsætningen blev først gennemført bagefter.
Jeg forstår fuldt ud, hvorfor det var så foruroligende og forvirrende. Efter at have set saldoen på 60.000 NZD, kontaktede du support og fik at vide, at du kunne hæve den gradvist i rater på 1.000 NZD. Agenten burde ideelt set have tjekket den aktive bonus og forklaret begrænsningen for maksimal gevinst i stedet for at give dig oplysninger, der skabte indtryk af, at hele beløbet kunne hæves.
Ikke desto mindre angav de arkiverede generelle vilkår, at gevinster fra en indbetalingsbonus var begrænset til ti gange det modtagne bonusbeløb . Optegnelserne viser et bonusbeløb på 45 NZD, hvilket ville give en maksimal udbetaling på 450 NZD under denne regel. Casinoet konverterede i sidste ende 600 NZD til rigtige penge, hvilket betyder, at du modtog mere end det beløb, der fulgte af den gældende generelle begrænsning.
Ikke desto mindre henviste casinoet også til en separat kampagnegrænse på 300 EUR. Selvom jeg ikke kunne fastslå, at denne specifikke betingelse var tilgængelig for dig, ser det ud til, at dette kan være det beløb, du har modtaget, efter at de gældende valutakurser er anvendt.
Jeg forstår, at dette resultat må være skuffende, især i betragtning af den viste saldo. De gældende vilkår på daværende tidspunkt fastsatte dog stadig et maksimalt udbetalingsbeløb fra bonusspil, og jeg kan ikke konkludere, at den resterende bonussaldo var udbetalt. Af denne grund vil klagen blive afvist.
Dear Tina1414,
Thank you for your patience while I completed a detailed review of your case.
Casino Guru maintained an archived copy of the casino's terms, and we have the version of Realz Casino’s General Terms that was applicable shortly before and at the time of your gameplay. I based my decision on this archived version, not on terms introduced afterward or on internal promotional conditions that were not shown to have been available to you.
The complete game history provided by the casino confirms that the NZD 60,000 win occurred while your free-spins bonus was still active and its wagering requirements had not yet been completed. The winnings were therefore credited to your bonus balance rather than your unrestricted real-money balance. Wagering was completed only afterward.
I completely understand why this was so upsetting and confusing. After seeing the NZD 60,000 balance, you contacted support and were told that you could withdraw it gradually in NZD 1,000 instalments. The agent should have ideally checked the active bonus and explained the maximum-win restriction instead of giving you information that created the impression that the entire amount would be withdrawable.
Nevertheless, the archived General Terms stated that winnings from a deposit bonus were limited to ten times the bonus amount received. The records show a bonus amount of NZD 45, which would produce a maximum withdrawal of NZD 450 under this rule. The casino ultimately converted NZD 600 into real money, meaning that you received more than the amount resulting from the applicable general restriction.
Nevertheless, the casino also referred to a separate EUR 300 promotional limit. While I could not establish that this specific condition was available to you, I seems this may be the amount you have received, after applying the applicable exchange rates.
I understand this outcome must be disappointing, particularly given the balance displayed. However, the terms applicable at the time still established a maximum withdrawal from bonus play, and I cannot conclude that the remaining bonus balance was payable. For this reason, the complaint will be rejected.
Automatisk oversættelse: