Kære Casino Guru-team,
Tak for dit svar.
Vi har omhyggeligt gennemgået alle tilgængelige optegnelser, herunder spillerens KYC-indsendelseshistorik, livechat-samtaler og indgående e-mail-optegnelser. Vi kan bekræfte, at Reybets ikke modtog den påståede e-mail dateret 16. juli eller nogen lokal bankudskrift vedhæftet den.
En videresendt kopi leveret af spilleren bekræfter ikke i sig selv, at den originale e-mail blev sendt til eller modtaget af Reybets. Om nødvendigt skal spilleren angive de komplette originale e-mail-headere og leveringsoplysninger, der viser den nøjagtige modtageradresse, afsendelsestidspunkt og status for vellykket levering. Baseret på vores egne optegnelser nåede ingen sådan e-mail eller vedhæftet fil frem til vores team.
Endnu vigtigere var det, at spilleren ikke havde gennemført KYC inden for den gældende periode. Bekræftelsesanmodningen og uploadinstruktionerne blev leveret den 8. juli . I henhold til vores offentliggjorte regler:
"Kunder, der skal gennemføre KYC-verifikation, skal gøre dette inden for 3 (tre) kalenderdage efter anmodningen. Manglende gennemførelse af KYC-processen inden for denne periode kan resultere i permanent lukning af kontoen og tab af eventuelle gevinster, efter Reybets' eget skøn."Marker venligst det.
Spilleren havde derfor indtil den 11. juli til at fremlægge alle nødvendige dokumenter. Selv ifølge spillerens egen påstand blev den påståede e-mail først sendt den 16. juli , otte dage efter KYC-anmodningen og fem dage efter fristens udløb. Selv hvis et sådant dokument var blevet sendt den 16. juli , ville det derfor være blevet indsendt uden for den tilladte verifikationsperiode og ville ikke omstøde den handling, der allerede var foretaget i henhold til vores regler.
De vedhæftede chatoptagelser viser også spillerens position på det tidspunkt. I stedet for at indsende bevis for den adresse, der var registreret på kontoen, krævede spilleren gentagne gange, at den registrerede adresse blev ændret, så et dokument for en anden adresse kunne bruges. Spilleren blev tydeligt informeret om, at gyldigt bevis for adresse skulle stemme overens med den nøjagtige adresse, der blev angivet under registreringen.
Under samtalen hævdede spilleren, at han allerede havde sendt en regning. Vores supportteam tjekkede optegnelserne og bekræftede straks, at der ikke var modtaget nogen regning. Spilleren fortsatte derefter med at anmode om en adresseændring i stedet for at fremvise det nødvendige dokument. Dette er uforeneligt med den senere påstand om, at et gyldigt matchende dokument allerede var blevet indsendt.
Spilleren fik klare instruktioner, hvor den præcise registrerede adresse krævede verifikation og tilstrækkelig mulighed for at efterkomme dem. Ikke desto mindre blev der ikke modtaget noget acceptabelt bevis for adressen inden for fristen på tre kalenderdage. Kontolukningen var derfor baseret på spillerens manglende gennemførelse af KYC inden for den fastsatte periode, ikke på at spilleren nævnte Casino Guru eller truede med at indgive en klage.
Afslutningsvis:
1- Reybets modtog hverken e-mail dateret 16. juli eller vedhæftet kontoudtog.
2- Spilleren indsendte ikke acceptabel dokumentation for den registrerede adresse inden for den krævede periode på tre kalenderdage.
3- Selv den påståede indsendelse den 16. juli ville være sket fem dage efter KYC-fristen.
4- Chatoptegnelserne viser, at spilleren foretog en adresseændring i stedet for at gennemføre verifikationen ved hjælp af de registrerede oplysninger.
5- Kontoen blev lukket i overensstemmelse med den offentliggjorte KYC-regel.
Vi anmoder venligst om, at klagen vurderes ud fra den dokumenterede tidslinje og spillerens manglende overholdelse af KYC-kravene inden for den gældende frist.
Reybets

Dear Casino Guru Team,
Thank you for your response.
We have carefully rechecked all available records, including the player’s KYC submission history, live-chat conversations and incoming email records. We can confirm that Reybets did not receive the alleged email dated July 16 or any local bank statement attached to it.
A forwarded copy provided by the player does not, by itself, establish that the original email was successfully sent to or received by Reybets. If necessary, the player should provide the complete original email headers and delivery information showing the exact recipient address, sending time and successful delivery status. Based on our own records, no such email or attachment reached our team.
More importantly, the player had already failed to complete KYC within the applicable period. The verification request and upload instructions were provided on July 8. Under our published rules:
"Customers required to complete KYC verification must do so within 3 (three) calendar days of the request. Failure to complete the KYC process within this period may result in the permanent closure of the account and the forfeiture of any winnings, at Reybets’ sole discretion." Please check it.
The player therefore had until July 11 to provide all required documents. Even according to the player’s own claim, the alleged email was not sent until July 16, eight days after the KYC request and five days after the deadline had expired. Consequently, even if such a document had been sent on July 16, it would have been submitted outside the permitted verification period and would not reverse the action already taken under our rules.
The attached chat records also show the player’s position at that time. Rather than submitting proof of the address registered on the account, the player repeatedly demanded that the registered address be changed so that a document for a different address could be used. The player was clearly informed that valid proof of address had to match the exact address declared during registration.
During the conversation, the player claimed to have already sent a bill. Our support team checked the records and immediately confirmed that no bill had been received. The player then continued requesting an address change instead of providing the required document. This is inconsistent with the later claim that a valid matching document had already been submitted.
The player was given clear instructions, the precise registered address requiring verification and sufficient opportunity to comply. Nevertheless, no acceptable proof of address was received within the three-calendar-day deadline. The account closure was therefore based on the player’s failure to complete KYC within the prescribed period, not on the player mentioning Casino Guru or threatening to submit a complaint.
In conclusion:
1- No email dated July 16 or attached bank statement was received by Reybets.
2- The player did not submit acceptable proof of the registered address within the required three-calendar-day period.
3- Even the alleged July 16 submission would have occurred five days after the KYC deadline.
4- The chat records show that the player pursued an address change instead of completing verification using the registered details.
5- The account was closed in accordance with the published KYC rule.
We respectfully request that the complaint be assessed based on the documented timeline and the player’s failure to comply with the KYC requirements within the applicable deadline.
Reybets

Automatisk oversættelse: