Kære Casino.Guru-team,
Tak for muligheden for at give en afklaring vedrørende denne klage.
Først og fremmest vil vi gerne bemærke, at denne sag allerede har været genstand for en detaljeret klagegennemgang af AskGamblers. Under denne gennemgang fik begge parter mulighed for at give deres forklaringer og understøttende beviser, herunder det materiale, som spilleren havde indsendt vedrørende den påståede selvudelukkelses-e-mail dateret 11. juni 2026. Efter sin gennemgang afgjorde AskGamblers i RoyalSeas favør og afsluttede klagen som løst.
Virksomheden har på sin side gentagne gange foretaget interne gennemgange af den tilgængelige kommunikationshistorik med spilleren. Baseret på resultaterne af disse gennemgange kan RoyalSea ikke bekræfte modtagelsen af den påståede selvudelukkelses-e-mail dateret 11. juni 2026. Beskeden findes ikke i virksomhedens officielle postkasse og blev ikke registreret eller behandlet af vores supportteam på den dato.
Under den tidligere klagegennemgang fremlagde spilleren Gmail-skærmbilleder og efterfølgende også en fil i .eml-format, som han oplyste var blevet downloadet direkte fra Gmail som den oprindelige besked.
Virksomheden udførte en teknisk analyse af den leverede fil. Filen indeholdt kun et begrænset sæt headere:
* MIME-version;
* Dato;
* Besked-ID;
* Emne;
* Fra;
* Til;
* Indholdstype.
Samtidig indeholdt den leverede fil ikke tekniske serverdata, der ville tillade at fastslå den faktiske transmissionssti for den omstridte besked gennem mailinfrastrukturen og bekræfte dens accept af modtagerens system, herunder Received-headerkæden, Return-Path, DKIM-Signature / X-Google-DKIM-Signature, Authentication-Results / ARC-Authentication-Results, X-Received, Delivered-To og andre relevante tekniske headere.
Derfor gør det fremlagte materiale det ikke muligt teknisk at fastslå, at den omstridte besked af 11. juni faktisk blev sendt til og accepteret af RoyalSeas postsystem.
Spilleren henviste også til Gmail, der viste statussen "Leveret efter 0 sekunder", og til fraværet af nogen meddelelse om tilbagesendelse eller leveringsfejl. Disse omstændigheder alene kan dog ikke fastslå, at den specifikke besked blev modtaget og behandlet af RoyalSeas mailinfrastruktur.
Til sammenligning blev spillerens efterfølgende kommunikation dateret 28. juni 2026 faktisk modtaget af virksomheden, hvilket bekræftes af vores tilgængelige kommunikationshistorik. Efter modtagelsen af den relevante kommunikation blev spillerens spillekonto blokeret den 28. juni 2026. Der blev ikke fundet nogen sammenlignelig bekræftelse på modtagelsen af den påståede e-mail fra 11. juni i virksomhedens systemer.
Som en del af den tidligere klagegennemgang modtog AskGamblers-administrationen også skærmbilleder fra RoyalSeas officielle virksomhedspostkasse, der viste den tilgængelige e-mailkorrespondance med spilleren.
Efter at have gennemgået de materialer, der var indsendt af begge parter, konkluderede AskGamblers, at RoyalSea havde handlet i overensstemmelse med sine vilkår og betingelser. Gennemgangen tog især højde for, at casinoet ikke havde modtaget den omstridte e-mail af 11. juni 2026, og at spillerens konto blev blokeret, da den relevante kommunikation blev modtaget den 28. juni 2026.
Vi forstår, at Casino.Guru foretager sin egen uafhængige vurdering af klager. Ikke desto mindre mener vi, at resultatet af den tidligere gennemgang er direkte relevant for den foreliggende sag, da den vedrører den samme spiller, den samme påståede selvudelukkelses-e-mail dateret 11. juni 2026 og i det væsentlige de samme beviser og omstændigheder, der allerede er blevet gennemgået i detaljer af en anden uafhængig klageløsningsplatform.
Vi kan derfor ikke tilslutte os spillerens påstand om, at RoyalSea modtog hans anmodning om selvudelukkelse den 11. juni 2026 og derefter bevidst fortsatte med at give ham tilladelse til at bruge sin spillekonto. Hovedpointen er, at virksomhedens modtagelse af den omstridte e-mail fra 11. juni ikke er blevet fastslået, og at beskeden mangler i RoyalSeas officielle postkasse.
Om nødvendigt er virksomheden parat til privat at give Casino.Guru de tilgængelige støttematerialer, herunder relevante skærmbilleder fra virksomhedens postkasse, materialer fra den tidligere klagegennemgang, .eml-filen indsendt af spilleren og den endelige AskGamblers-afgørelse.
Vi beder respektfuldt om, at disse omstændigheder og den tilgængelige dokumentation tages i betragtning ved gennemgangen af denne klage.
Med venlig hilsen,
RoyalSea Administration
Dear Casino.Guru Team,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide clarification regarding this complaint.
First of all, we would like to note that this matter has already been subject to a detailed complaint review by AskGamblers. During that review, both parties were given the opportunity to provide their explanations and supporting evidence, including the materials submitted by the player concerning the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. Following its review, AskGamblers ruled in RoyalSea’s favor and closed the complaint as resolved.
For its part, the Company has repeatedly conducted internal reviews of the available communication history with the player. Based on the results of these reviews, RoyalSea cannot confirm receipt of the alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026. The message is not present in the Company’s official mailbox and was not registered or processed by our Support Team on that date.
During the previous complaint review, the player provided Gmail screenshots and subsequently also provided a file in .eml format, which he stated had been downloaded directly from Gmail as the original message.
The Company conducted a technical analysis of the provided file. The file contained only a limited set of headers:
* MIME-Version;
* Date;
* Message-ID;
* Subject;
* From;
* To;
* Content-Type.
At the same time, the provided file did not contain technical server data that would allow the actual transmission path of the disputed message through the mail infrastructure to be established and its acceptance by the recipient’s system to be confirmed, including the Received header chain, Return-Path, DKIM-Signature / X-Google-DKIM-Signature, Authentication-Results / ARC-Authentication-Results, X-Received, Delivered-To, and other relevant technical headers.
Therefore, the materials provided do not allow it to be technically established that the disputed message of June 11 was actually transmitted to and accepted by RoyalSea’s mail system.
The player also referred to Gmail displaying the status "Delivered after 0 seconds" and to the absence of any bounce-back or delivery failure notification. However, these circumstances alone do not establish that the specific message was received and processed by RoyalSea’s mail infrastructure.
For comparison, the player’s subsequent communication dated June 28, 2026 was actually received by the Company, as confirmed by our available communication history. Following receipt of the relevant communication, the player’s gaming account was blocked on June 28, 2026. No comparable confirmation of receipt of the alleged June 11 email was found in the Company’s systems.
As part of the previous complaint review, the AskGamblers administration was also provided with screenshots from RoyalSea’s official corporate mailbox showing the available email correspondence with the player.
After reviewing the materials submitted by both parties, AskGamblers concluded that RoyalSea had acted in accordance with its Terms and Conditions. In particular, the review took into account that the casino had not received the disputed email of June 11, 2026, and that once the relevant communication was received on June 28, 2026, the player’s account was blocked.
We understand that Casino.Guru conducts its own independent assessment of complaints. Nevertheless, we believe that the outcome of the previous review is directly relevant to the present case, as it concerns the same player, the same alleged self-exclusion email dated June 11, 2026, and substantially the same evidence and circumstances that have already been reviewed in detail by another independent complaint resolution platform.
Accordingly, we cannot agree with the player’s allegation that RoyalSea received his self-exclusion request on June 11, 2026 and thereafter knowingly continued to allow him to use his gaming account. The key point is that the Company’s receipt of the disputed June 11 email has not been established, and the message is absent from RoyalSea’s official mailbox.
If necessary, the Company is prepared to provide Casino.Guru privately with the available supporting materials, including the relevant screenshots from the corporate mailbox, materials from the previous complaint review, the .eml file submitted by the player, and the final AskGamblers decision.
We respectfully ask that these circumstances and the available evidence be taken into consideration when reviewing this complaint.
Kind regards,
RoyalSea Administration
Automatisk oversættelse: