Jeg vil gerne præcisere, at min klage ikke vedrører en rutinemæssig forsinkelse i behandlingen.
Min bekymring er den gentagne annullering af gyldige udbetalingsanmodninger og anvendelsen af nye omsætningsbetingelser, efter at en udbetaling allerede var iværksat.
I dette tilfælde anmodede jeg om en udbetaling, før der blev tilbudt nogen bonus. Mens udbetalingen ventede, indbetalte jeg $60 og fik en bonus på $45, som jeg accepterede efter at have foretaget en yderligere indbetaling. Udbetalingen på 1100NZD blev ikke annulleret på det tidspunkt, hvor jeg accepterede bonussen, men først efter at spillet var startet, hvorefter et omsætningskrav på 45 gange blev anvendt på min saldo. Dette havde den effekt, at midler, der allerede var blevet indsendt til udbetaling, blev genlåst.
Derudover er dette ikke en isoleret hændelse. Jeg har tidligere hævet gevinster på over $2.000, og hævningen blev annulleret flere gange med den forklaring, at det kan være relateret til min bank. Min bank i New Zealand har bekræftet, at den ikke blokerer eller afviser indgående casinobetalinger, hvilket betyder, at disse annulleringer skete fra casinoets side.
På grund af dette mønster mener jeg, at problemet handler om retfærdighed og gennemsigtighed snarere end normal behandlingstid. At tilbyde en bonus under en ventende udbetaling, og derefter først annullere udbetalingen efter spil og anvende nye omsætningskrav, skaber en situation, hvor tidligere udbetalingsbare midler bliver begrænsede.
Jeg anmoder respektfuldt om en fuldstændig gennemgang af disse fremgangsmåder og assistance til at sikre frigivelsen af mine legitime gevinster. Jeg har forsøgt at vedhæfte Gmail-kopier af mine gevinster, en tråd og tidslinje for annulleringer, samt en forsikring om, at jeg vil få mine penge indsat.
I would like to clarify that my complaint is not about a routine processing delay.
My concern is the repeated cancellation of valid withdrawal requests and the application of new wagering conditions after a withdrawal had already been initiated.
In this case, I requested a withdrawal before any bonus was offered. While that withdrawal was pending, I deposited $60 and was presented with a $45 bonus, which I accepted after making a further deposit. The withdrawal of 1100NZD was not cancelled at the point of accepting the bonus, but only after gameplay had occurred, at which time a 45× wagering requirement was applied to my balance. This had the effect of re-locking funds that had already been submitted for withdrawal.
Additionally, this is not an isolated incident. I previously withdrew winnings of over $2,000, and the withdrawal was cancelled multiple times with the explanation that it may be related to my bank. My bank in New Zealand has confirmed that it does not block or reject incoming casino payments, meaning these cancellations occurred on the casino’s side.
Because of this pattern, I believe the issue concerns fairness and transparency rather than normal processing time. Offering a bonus during a pending withdrawal, then cancelling the withdrawal only after gameplay and applying new wagering requirements, creates a situation where previously withdrawable funds become restricted.
I respectfully request a full review of these practices and assistance in securing the release of my legitimate winnings. I have tried to attach Gmail copies of my winnings, and a thread and timeline of cancelations, as well as assurance I will have my funds deposited.
Automatisk oversættelse: