Jeg vil gerne have, at Casino Guru gennemgår dette som en separat klage om ansvarligt spil/kontolukning, som ikke er relateret til min tidligere klage på €7.050.
Den 25. juli 2026 bad jeg gentagne gange WinBeast om at lukke/blokere min konto. En af mine anmodninger angav eksplicit:
"Kan I venligst blokere min konto, så jeg aldrig kan spille her igen?"
Jeg gentog min anmodning om lukning flere gange bagefter.
Jeg havde også gentagne gange informeret WinBeast om, at jeg var registreret i CRUKS, det hollandske nationale register over selvudelukkelse fra spil. Derfor var WinBeast opmærksom på min eksisterende selvudelukkelse, samtidig med at de modtog gentagne anmodninger om permanent at blokere min konto.
WinBeast bekræftede mine anmodninger. Den 27. juli fik jeg at vide:
"Lukning af en konto er noget, som kun din VIP-manager har myndighed til at behandle."
Den 30. juli bekræftede WinBeast igen, at min anmodning om lukning var blevet videresendt til min VIP-manager.
Trods dette blev min konto ikke lukket.
Den 7. august fortalte min VIP-manager mig endelig:
"Jeg har ikke den tekniske mulighed for at lukke din konto. Den bedste fremgangsmåde ville være blot at logge ud og undlade at logge ind eller spille."
I samme besked lovede han:
"For at støtte din beslutning og sikre, at du ikke bliver fristet, vil jeg øjeblikkeligt ekskludere din konto fra alle vores marketing- og reklamekampagner."
WinBeast fortsatte dog efterfølgende med at kontakte mig med spilleincitamenter.
Den 22. august modtog jeg en personlig VIP-kampagne, der opfordrede mig til at indbetale €30 til gengæld for 100 gratis spins. Senere modtog jeg yderligere personlige beskeder, der opfordrede mig til at vende tilbage til gambling, bonusser blev tilføjet til min konto, og jeg blev tilbudt cashback knyttet til indbetalinger på €1.000, €2.500 og €5.000.
Vigtigst af alt forblev min konto fuldt operationel. Min transaktionshistorik viser, at WinBeast den 24. august, uger efter min første anmodning om lukning, stadig accepterede indbetalinger fra mig, herunder €999 og €251.
Jeg påstår ikke, at jeg eksplicit skrev ordene "Jeg har en ludomani." Min klage er baseret på de dokumenterede fakta:
Jeg har gentagne gange anmodet om permanent lukning/blokering af min konto.
Jeg bad specifikt om at blive blokeret, så jeg "aldrig kunne spille her igen".
Jeg har gentagne gange informeret WinBeast om, at jeg var registreret i CRUKS, et nationalt register for selvudelukkelse fra spil.
WinBeast bekræftede mine anmodninger om lukning, men lukkede ikke min konto.
WinBeast lovede at stoppe markedsføringen for at sikre, at jeg ikke blev "fristet".
Trods dette løfte sendte WinBeast mig efterfølgende personlige spille- og indbetalingsincitamenter.
WinBeast fortsatte med at acceptere indbetalinger fra min konto.
Jeg har vedhæftet skærmbilleder, der dokumenterer disse begivenheder.
Jeg vil derfor gerne have Casino Guru til at vurdere, om WinBeast handlede korrekt i henhold til principperne for ansvarligt spil ved ikke at reagere på mine gentagne anmodninger om lukning af min konto og efterfølgende fortsat at tillade og aktivt opfordre mig til at spille.
I would like Casino Guru to review this as a separate responsible gambling/account closure complaint, unrelated to my previous €7,050 dispute.
On 25 July 2026, I repeatedly asked WinBeast to close/block my account. One of my requests explicitly stated:
"Can you please block my account so I can never play here again."
I repeated my closure request several times afterwards.
I had also repeatedly informed WinBeast that I was registered in CRUKS, the Dutch national gambling self-exclusion register. Therefore, WinBeast was aware of my existing self-exclusion while also receiving repeated requests to permanently block my account.
WinBeast acknowledged my requests. On 27 July, I was told:
"Closing an account is something only your VIP manager has the authority to process."
On 30 July, WinBeast again confirmed that my closure request had been forwarded to my VIP manager.
Despite this, my account was not closed.
On 7 August, my VIP manager finally told me:
"I don't have the technical option to close your account. The best approach would be to simply log out and refrain from logging in or playing."
In the same message, he promised:
"To help support your decision and ensure you aren't tempted, I will immediately exclude your account from all our marketing and promo campaigns."
However, WinBeast subsequently continued contacting me with gambling incentives.
On 22 August, I received a personalised VIP promotion encouraging me to deposit €30 in exchange for 100 free spins. I later received further personalised messages encouraging me to return to gambling, bonuses were added to my account, and I was offered cashback linked to deposits of €1,000, €2,500 and €5,000.
Most importantly, my account remained fully operational. My transaction history shows that on 24 August, weeks after my first closure request, WinBeast was still accepting deposits from me, including €999 and €251.
I am not claiming that I explicitly wrote the words "I have a gambling addiction." My complaint is based on the documented facts:
I repeatedly requested permanent account closure/blocking.
I specifically asked to be blocked so I could "never play here again."
I repeatedly informed WinBeast that I was registered in CRUKS, a national gambling self-exclusion register.
WinBeast acknowledged my closure requests but did not close my account.
WinBeast promised to stop marketing to ensure I was not "tempted."
Despite that promise, WinBeast subsequently sent me personalised gambling and deposit incentives.
WinBeast continued accepting deposits from my account.
I have attached screenshots documenting these events.
I would therefore like Casino Guru to assess whether WinBeast acted appropriately under responsible gambling principles by failing to act on my repeated account closure requests and subsequently continuing to allow and actively encourage me to gamble.
Redigeret
Automatisk oversættelse: