Fair play uden RNG

God dag til alle elskere af spænding.

Der er et projekt med online PvP-spil uden uheld.

Spillet er lavet af spillerne selv. Ingen færdigheder er nødvendige, alle spillere er i fuldstændig lige forhold.

Spredning og volatilitet er under gennemsnittet.

Lad os sige cirka x3-4,5 med en sandsynlighed på 15 - 30% i hver spillerunde.

Jeg er interesseret i meninger om, hvorvidt sådan en model er efterspurgt, eller er det mere spændende at klikke med et program indlæst imod dig?

Let's see some replies hopefully soon.

PS Dette er ikke en reklame.

Jeg vil gerne forstå spillernes ønsker.

P.S. I pretty much do not understand the criteria anyway, so feel free to be more concrete regarding the odds, volatility, and RTP - if we are even talking about gambling.

Just no links, thank you.

online casino

1. PvP
2. Spillets algoritmer udelukker fuldstændigt RNG
3. Gennemsigtigt fair gameplay uden indblanding fra spilarrangøren
4. Alle spillere er på fuldstændig lige fod og har lige store chancer for at blive en vinder.
5. Der vil altid være en vinder, derfor den lave volatilitet.
6. Da der ikke er nogen RNG, er der ingen RTP som sådan.
7. En eller flere spillere vil være vindere.
8. Manglen på en tilpasselig RTP er det vigtigste kendetegn ved den foreslåede algoritme.

I'm not sure I follow the concept.

So, how does the game work - PVP in casino? Given that we are still discussing an algorithm and have excluded the RNG, how will we determine the winner?

Dette er det nye koncept.

Jeg er interesseret i efterspørgslen efter sådan en model.

I'm curious about how you can consider potential demand when the provided explanation seems to have significant flaws. Follow my logic for a moment:

For example, poker is a casino alternative to PVP that incorporates randomness, follows an algorithm or specific RTP, and boasts one of the lowest house edges, all thanks to the use of shuffled cards.

It primarily depends on the characteristics of each player.

But based on your explanation of the PVP model, it sounds more like poker without cards. You must have a chance to win or lose in order to gamble, and either a card or an algorithm achieves this. Analogically, RTP represents "Return to player." Generally speaking, each action has a result; the result is either a win or a loss, and based on that, the RTP is measurable. Without implementing a process to determine the bet's outcome, we can't seriously discuss the game of chance or even gambling at all. Chance, by the way, is a very short version of the concept represented by RNG.

Jeg afslører ikke algoritmen, da den allerede er genstand for kommerciel anvendelse.

Jeg ville se, hvor interesserede spillerne var i PvP-modellen og manglen på software-tilfælde af generatorer (RNG).

At tabe eller vinde i spillet kan opnås gennem spillerens færdigheder eller gennem tilfældigheder. Eller, i mit tilfælde, gennem bestemte algoritmer. Jeg forstår, at jeg taler for generelt, men jeg håber, det er tydeligt nok.

Sammenligningen med poker er meget korrekt. I poker er der RNG - fordeling af kortene og spillerens færdigheder. Og hvis jeg forstår det korrekt, gør Radka opmærksom på, at dette har lav tiltrækningskraft?

Hvorfor præcist?

Ah, now I think I'm beginning to understand. Thank you for being patient with me. First of all, I fear the translation to English partially changed the meaning.

But now I believe I got it. 🙂

Now that I know the model in question incorporates the algorithm in some way, it makes more sense.

However, I fear my voice is not what you are looking for, because the way I understand it, you would like to know whether players would be interested in such an adventure. As an administrator, I may not be considered a typical player. Yet we may discuss the idea further; perhaps we can attract players after all.

Let's stick with the poker. Could you describe similarities and differences compared to poker, please? I'm trying to imagine playing the PVP game you have in mind.

Nå, hints duer ikke her)). Du skal give hele billedet, ellers ingenting.

Har du som administrator af sådan et websted nogen interesserede i at implementere et sådant projekt?

En tilfeldighedsgeneratorfri spilleplatform er planlagt.

Et helt alternativt økosystem. For folk der elsker spillet, men forstår at programmeret tilfældighed ikke er tilfældighed.

For dem, der elsker fair og transparent spil mellem spillere med lige muligheder.

Hm, so I guess that's the end. No, I'm not aware of such contact. I'm sorry.

So, we're getting back at the beginning - what is the randomness? If it's not a random number generator (RNG), what is the randomness? I personally saw a lot of "decentralized" crypto fair-proven sites, where players compete against each other, overseeing, and they were pretty much all scams.

"The distinctive feature of decentralized gaming platforms is that they are created on the blockchain, meaning there is no central control (unlike any centralized gaming platforms or any others that are just trying to seem decentralized).

The smart contracts within decentralized gaming platforms are self-executing agreements with lucid instructions written into codes. Since these are rule-enforcing contracts, there is no need for an intermediary, which guarantees transparent play and fair chances of winning. This is why the 1xcrypto system is completely built on smart contracts.

In addition, our Smart Contracts have completely passed independent security audits and the entire gaming platform is open-source, which guarantees that the code has been checked by thousands of security and crypto industry enthusiasts." 🤣👌

https://casino.guru/1xcrypto-casino-review 👈👈

Just saying. Good luck with that.

Jeg sætter ikke spørgsmålstegn ved blockchain og smarte kontrakter.

Dette er så at sige allerede en konsekvens af den fuldførte handling. Handling er et spil baseret på tilfældigheder.

Tilfældighed er baseret på en tilfældig talgenerator med en forprogrammeret indsatskoefficient. Spillere er som standard enige om, at spillemaskinen eller online spilleautomaten i en periode N, som ingen er informeret om, vil give 96% tilbage til spillerne.

Spillere får fat i spilleautomater og maskiner, som efter deres mening "ikke har været spillet i lang tid".

En indstillet tilfældig talgenerator og terningkast på et bord er to fundamentalt forskellige typer tilfældighed.

Derfor taler jeg specifikt om denne del af gambling.

Ikke fra det øjeblik, hvor spilleren kan kontrollere, om der blev anvendt RNG, eller om der var manuel indgriben.

Nemlig på stadiet med at danne spilprocessen og bestemme vinderen.

Og hvis denne proces er uden pseudo-tilfældighed, så er der ingen grund til at bevise fraværet af intervention.

Det er det, jeg taler om

Jeg ville generelt gerne vide, om dette er fundamentalt interessant for nogen eller ej.

I see - and I hope you are going to receive some feedback from the community.

I still feel like this is far too theoretical for me; perhaps I'm just unable to think outside the box. 😀

Hvorfor teoretisk? Fordi der ikke er nogen specifikke algoritmer at diskutere?

No, more because I still do not understand or imagine the model and associated game.

Nå, dette siger i det mindste, at et sådant produkt ikke findes endnu).

Og det er et plus for mig)

I wouldn't say that based solely on a conversation with one person, but that's up to you. 🙂