Det lader til, at du foreslår, at spillere stoler på integriteten og sikkerheden af softwaren, der leveres af store velrenommerede casinomærker. Det er ikke en dårlig tilgang, men det virker ikke ideelt.
Selvom oddsene kan være lave, så tænk for eksempel på, at en spiludbyder som IGT, blueprint kunne engagere sig i uretfærdig praksis. (Jeg ved godt, at de ikke vil). Bare fordi det bruges af store kasinoer, gør det det ikke automatisk troværdigt.
Hvis casino.guru ikke kan vurdere de tekniske aspekter, tror jeg måske, det kunne være bedst at overlade dette til spillernes vurdering.
Men realistisk set, da spilleren ikke kan vide alt, er der virkelig ingen anden mulighed end dit forslag.
It seems like you're suggesting players rely on the integrity and security of the software provided by big reputable casino brands. That's not a bad approach, but it doesn't seem ideal.
While the odds may be low, consider for instance that a game provider like IGT, blueprint could engage in unfair practices.(I do know they won't.) Just because it's used by large casinos doesn't automatically make it trustworthy.
If casino.guru can't evaluate the technical aspects, perhaps I think it could be best to leave this to the judgement of the players.
But realistically, given that the player can't know everything, there's really no other option apart from your suggestion.
Automatisk oversættelse:
Deaktiver din AdBlock