Du ved, hvis du spiller længe nok, kan du blive mistænksom, fordi mange mennesker husker at have tabt over de faktiske gevinster. Årsagen er enkel, sådanne spillere spiller for at vinde - det forventes at vinde lejlighedsvis.
Jeg mener, at du altid skal finde beviser, hvis du foretrækker at sige, at nogen "sutter" højt. Ville du være hård ved kasinoet, hvor du for nylig har vundet, eller vundet stort?
Normalt handler det om at tabe, kasinoet er elendigt, fordi jeg tabte. Trods god kundepleje, udsøgt spiludvalg eller betalinger gratis... Det er det, jeg hører mest på forummet 🙂.
Jeg mener heller ikke, at en dommer er et bevis.
Tja, undskyld at afbryde din samtale, jeg følte bare en trang til at nævne det.
You know, if you play long enough, you may become suspicious because many people remember losing over the actual winnings. The reason is simple, such players play to win - it is expected to win occasionally.
I believe you should always find proof if you prefer to say someone "sucks" aloud. Would you be hard on the casino where you've recently won, or won big?
Usually, it is all about losing, the casino sucks because I lost. Despite great customer care, exquisite games selection, or payments free of charge... That's what I hear most on the forum 🙂.
I also do not believe that A judge is a proof.
Well, sorry to interrupt your conversation, I just felt an urge to mention that.
Automatisk oversættelse: