Jeg har været medlem af Joya i et stykke tid nu. For nylig, efter at have accepteret en indskudsmatchbonus, satsede jeg det påkrævede beløb som bekræftet af live chat. Jeg spillede derefter Live Blackjack og arbejdede mig op fra €4000-ulige til €8000-ulige.
Efter at have anmodet om en tilbagetrækning, blev jeg overrasket i morges over at modtage en e-mail om, at de kun var parate til at betale mig €1000 ud af €8000. De påberåbte sig to overtrædelser:
1) Jeg spillede et spil (Sugar Rush), som har en bonuskøbsfunktion. Bemærk, at jeg *ikke* købte funktionen. Jeg spillede lige på et slot, som tilfældigvis har sådan en funktion.
2) Jeg spillede live-spil (Live Blackjack), efter at bonusindsatsen var afsluttet (noget man ville antage, at casinoet helt sikkert ville sætte pris på, da de opnår mere fordel af spilleren).
For mig virker begge disse udtryk usædvanligt barske og uregelmæssige, selvom de er omfattet af vilkårene. Hvad synes du? Ville jeg have nogen grund til at indgive en klage?
I have been a member of Joya for a while now. Recently, after accepting a deposit match bonus, I wagered the required amount as confirmed by live chat. I then played Live Blackjack and worked my way up from €4000-odd to €8000-odd.
After requesting a withdrawal, I was surprised this morning to receive an email stating that they were only prepared to pay me €1000 out of €8000. They cited two infringements:
1) I played a game (Sugar Rush) which has a Bonus Buy feature. Note that I did *not* buy the feature. I was just playing a slot which happens to have such a feature.
2) I played live games (Live Blackjack) after the bonus wagering had been completed (something one would assume the casino would surely appreciate as they gain more of an edge from the player).
To me, both these terms seem unusually harsh and irregular even if they are covered by the terms. What do you think? Would I have any grounds for filing a complaint?
Automatisk oversættelse: