Anmeldelser af Guru

Hvem tror på, at GURU bliver belønnet af kasinoer for gode anmeldelser?

Hi, what makes you think we should be paid for reviews? Do you think it would be worthwhile and would we help players in such a big way? I think probably not so much, but feel free to give your opinion and we can have a debate about it.

Ja, de faker det.

Du får betaling for den slags anmeldelser.

Gør du dette gratis?

Yes, we are reviewing casinos for free and almost daily my colleagues reject any forms of compensation offered by casino representatives for "adjusting" the Safety Index. 🙂

Så der er jo tilbud om kompensation.

Det var det, jeg havde mistanke om.

Du bør bruge rigtige spillere med reel erfaring.

Din platform kan gøre meget for at øge bevidstheden blandt spillerne, så de ikke bliver revet med.

Der er mange casinoer, der blot sender SMS-beskeder, som ikke kan blokeres.

No, you did not understand, I am afraid. The second chance, if you don't mind:

I mentioned that casinos have tried to pay out to improve the indexes, but all suggestions are always rejected because we do not do that. 🙂

We use players' experiences - hence comes the user rating. You know I understand this idea quite well; the general opinion is that a bunch of hardcore players would be capable of perfect reviews. We go the way of investigating complaints instead, and I understand it is not acceptable to everyone.

So, feel free to consult just the user rating here. Choose the option that best suits your needs.

Ja, men brugerbedømmelsen har intet at gøre med din bedømmelse.

De vurderer det alt for højt i forhold til, hvad brugerne vurderer.

Jeg tror, ​​de ikke forstår.

F.eks. My Empire Casino din vurdering over 9

De fleste brugere har negative anmeldelser.

Hvordan får du 9

Hello, I believe you already answered the question. Our ratings are called the Safety Index because the aspects included in the formula are purely data-based markers. User reviews, on the other hand, are unproven user opinions or experiences and are thus not included in the Safety Index.

Many players don't know that the Safety Index doesn't measure how quickly you get paid or your chances of winning; it only indicates whether you can eventually collect the winnings.

Something like that can't be calculated based on user reviews, I'm afraid, yet I get that this way does not suit everyone.

Så brugerne er ligegyldige?

Nope, they are.

But I hope you can consider the other aspects too: such experiences are not measurable when talking about user reviews. We cannot verify every user review because they often reflect personal feelings. But it's always been a key part of the casino homepage, and the user feedback is there.

The Safety Index is a proven, data-based value, unlike what you may know from other sites reviewing casinos. We have our own process.

Even though it may look different based on the forum posts, complaining about things the casino is obliged to do does not belong in the user review. You may do so on the forum, of course.

I mean, would you consider this a user review for example?

"False advertising and bogus bonus rules stay away is a scam has been blacklisted on other sites" How would you adjust the Safety Index based on such a user score?

That's the problem we are facing when it comes to the user reviews; hence, those are kept aside from the Safety Index, which is primarily based on the following aspects:

1) Size of the casino

2) Player complaints—proven facts collected from the players and casinos

3) Deductions for restrictive or unfair practices

4) Points added for positive qualities

5) Related casinos

Those points have the potential to provide a clue to whether the casino would be willing to pay out the winnings, which is the point of the Safety Index.

Well, I'm sorry for another extensive answer. 🙏

GOLDENPLAY CASINO

9,5

De har ingen støtte, hvordan er det muligt?

Så kom nu, vær lidt mere objektiv

Hmm, I think it's clearly stated in our review that they don't have live chat. Not every casino has to be facilitated with it. It's not the best, but it's not completely unusual either. 

However, this is not something that should sink a casino in terms of safety index.

Hvordan vurderes højden?

Men betalinger?

Hvis man skal vente i dagevis på svar, er det så værd at få en høj vurdering?

Hello, did you see the review details, please? It is not saying how quickly you get paid because it may vary a lot. Please consider the Safety Index as a measure of safety, not speed. 🙏

I bet you didn't know.

I fully support you.GURU Really takes money from the casino for good reviews.Very often they have inflated artificial ratings for casinos. Therefore, they take money from the casino for good reviews.

Guru can't be trusted. They are completely corrupt.

Hi, I see you have a clear and quite combative stance.

Can I ask what happened to you? Whatever it is, we can always talk about it calmly and with a cool head. I think this thread actually shows that. I am here if you need anything.

Åh nej 😀 ja, de har sandsynligvis ikke de penge (penge, der fungerer som den essentielle søjle i alle online casino anmeldelsessider, når anmeldelsessiden har opnået nok berømmelse og besøgende til, at dens meninger og anmeldelser begynder at påvirke casinoernes omdømme og vinderprocenterne for deres pengegyllige aktionærer (eller lignende langsigtede profitindtægter).

Tænk nu over, hvorfor man markedsfører "some never heard nonsense" som det førende casino med 40x omsætningskrav, hvilket praktisk talt betyder, at selvom du vinder et godt beløb, vil du på grund af casinoets meget fair natur få x antal gratis spins, når du giver dem dine oplysninger. Disse vil 100% helt sikkert blive solgt videre, så andre casinoer (såvel som andre tilfældige parter, så længe de har motivationen til at købe borgernes data) kan bombardere denne naive person med ugentlige "GYLDIG KUN I DAG" gratis spins-annoncer, der vil få dig i den samme fælde, men indbetalingspengene vil bare gå til en anden hvælving.