Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (side 161)

Can someone please help PIXELEUM.IO

hsve said

We have conducted a thorough review of your case and can confirm the following:

All transactions were processed with full 3D Secure (3DS) verification.

The digital art you purchased was delivered to the wallet address you provided.

The delivery of the digital art is recorded on the blockchain.

ITS A RIGHT OUT LIE

Lad være med at tale med mig om bevis, banken har bevis for købet i form af 3D-S verifikation, hvorfor de fleste banker nægter. Alt andet er en privat tvist, som banken normalt ikke blander sig i. Enhver, der anklager banken for hvidvask, er ude af held, banken skal have kendskab til det og handlet forsætligt. Du som kortholder og betalingsmodtager hvidvasker penge.

Ombudsmanden tjekker fakta for at se, om banken har begået en fejl, hvilket normalt ikke er tilfældet. Du godkendte en betaling, og banken udførte den. Mastercard/VISA-reglerne gælder for betalingstjenesteudbyderne og de banker, der er involveret i betalingsprocessen; reglerne er ikke beregnet til forbrugeren. Derfor er ombudsmanden spild af tid.

Det er altid en andens skyld, ikke dig selv.

Det magiske ord er goodwill fra bankens side, som formentlig vil drøfte sagen direkte med en afdeling hos Mastercard eller VISA. Banken er faktisk forpligtet til at anmelde forholdet, så de handlende bliver stoppet. Det er dog en sag mellem VISA og den pågældende bank, kunden har intet kendskab til det, det er deres sag.

Derfor er der ingen masterløsning i denne sag, meget afhænger af bankens eller de pågældende modtageres goodwill.

Nej, de lyver ikke, de fortæller sandheden.

Kasinoet har modtaget penge i form af krypto, du har bekræftet transaktionen, slutningen af historien 😉I

They said I received art therefore lying

Se mit indlæg ovenfor, autoriseret = lortekort Du skal nu bevise det modsatte 😉

I can see Katze1337's point....as frustrating as it is, sounds like they're correct. Wanted to deposit to a casino...deposited to a casino.

Lets be honest we're all just doing what we can to try and recoup some funds. I think my main goal is now shifting to try to make the banks take note of what's going on and doing something to stop it.

But I've said it before...I just don't think it's not a big enough issue for the banks to worry about.

Jeg skal dog nævne, at de erfaringer, jeg deler her, vedrører retstilstanden i Tyskland. Den juridiske situation i Tyskland foreskriver, at banker ikke skal iværksætte tilbageførsler, hvis transaktionerne var beregnet til spil. Bankerne har simpelthen intet kendskab til udbydernes potentielt ulovlige handlinger, så de kan ikke drages til ansvar.

Det samme gælder for betalingstjenesteudbydere, der er registreret i Tyskland; de skal ikke foretage tilbagebetalinger, de kan gøre hvad de vil, de har ingen pligt til at tjekke deres kunder. De er dog forpligtet til at undlade at hvidvaske penge, og hvis det er åbenlyst - vægten lægges på åbenlyst - at udbyderne behandler betalinger ulovligt, så er det deres pligt at undlade at gøre det.

I Tyskland pålægger GGL regelmæssigt betalingsforbud mod betalingstjenesteudbydere, normalt dem, der bruger det åbne banksystem.

Efter min mening er betalingssystemerne faldet i hænderne på kriminelle, der kan gøre, hvad de vil. Ser man på Østeuropa og Storbritannien, er det mærkeligt, at støtten fra betalingsbehandlerne overvejende varetages af østeuropæiske folk 😉 du kan forestille dig resten.

Hvis du indbetaler penge på casinoet, må du forvente, at de bliver ganget eller tabt helt, og i så fald er det ikke rimeligt at indsende en tilbageførsel. Men hvis du bliver snydt for din udbetaling, kan jeg godt forstå det.

Jeg kender dog også til et par tilfælde i Tyskland, hvor banker anmelder spilleren til politiet, fordi spilleren foretager betalinger og også modtager gevinster. I dette tilfælde er kontoen normalt spærret, og der anmodes om en forklaring på transaktionerne. Derfor bør kasinoerne samarbejde og refundere, hvis betalingerne omkodes eller foretages ved bankoverførsel med efterfølgende køb af krypto.

Ellers skal du bare ikke spille, det er der, du vinder mest.

Og hvis du har indbetalt 20.000 euro og hævet 23.000, har du ikke ret til tilbagebetaling. Indskuddene modregnes i gevinsterne. Du vil så være 3.000 i overskud.

Deponeret 13.500,- udbetalt 500€ = ret til 13.000

Alle burde forstå.

Is there anyone who knows how to contact Arzella Limited?

Has anyone got email addresses for enygma sas and ewave?

they are scam it is true , peoples cant get money witdrawal idiotioes

they are scam peoples cant get money witdrawal idiotes i hope police staten wil reagere on them

they are scam peoples must lese more about all omgd

Capitol one has sided with Santana BV for dodgy dealings. Was honest with them. Even though I never used funds and requested refund which was refused and account closed. They also used 3rd party merchant to process payment. I explained credit cards are banned and illegal site ect ect. They don't care

What was the name of the merchant used? and what website?

I reported it to the authorities and the consumer protection agency, I also reported it to the main organization in America and the European Union, they were shocked by all this, they didn't know that people are disadvantaged when it comes to all this, that they are playing with people, they won't say anything anymore, they can easily say it already found where their addresses are, where they wrote from, and their headquarters

Vilnius. - LTU and mystake. I have wrote back to bank with lots of compelling evidence. Pointed out the bank works for me not these crooked sites as its a credit card and they have with held my funds and used MCC that was Incorrect as C C use is banned and they are illegal. Not only did I not recive any service they have stolen funds and used 3rd party merchant to process it and bank saying nothing to see here, 🤔 SMH err nope I have sent all proof again as I said they work for me I will report them. To the FSC as the bank is in wrong I took screenshots of deposit On the site it does not match the merchant only amount and time

they are scam nobody can get money

Men banken gjorde, hvad du ville, betalte, og det var det. De skal ikke gøre mere for dig, alt andet er en privat tvist, forstå det endelig. Juridisk er det en gråzone at ændre MCC, ikke en forbrydelse. Bankerne skal ikke tjekke betalingen for at se, om den er juridisk korrekt eller ej.

Du kan frit sagsøge udbyderen for dette...

It's a credit card and also the funds where not used. I wanted them withdrawn and returned, as initially when I made the deposit it left the account straight away but hadn't reflected in my account they said it could take a while. Even though it said deposit succeeded. Took screenshot. So I left it for a while. Next thing I know I can't log in. Emailed them asking for refund and being ignored Credit card company said I have to get in contact with merchant, this is the issue. The merchant on my credit card is not the casino even though I have proof I deposited at the casino I don't know who the merchant is to contact either way I just want my funds back it's not a chargeback it's what is rightfully mine.