Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (side 384)

Sorry to jump on - are you saying that your bank wouldn’t even raise the chargebacks ? If you don’t mind me asking what bank are you with? I’m nearly sure there’s some legislation that says your bank has to raise them if you request it ?

Can I ask before ya raised the complaint with the ombudsman did you do to pre arbitration and arbitration ?

I don't want to post too much information as the FOS is ongoing but they refused to raise them so didn't even get a pre arbitration or arbitration process

Wow - that defo sounds like a good case for FOS then - it actually might work in your favour - good luck with it

It'd be nice if it went my way, my gut feeling is that it won't though, in the meantime i'm going to focus on informing the relevant authorities about Goldenbet/Santeda's illegal activity.

I’ve sent emails to the media about what is happening. If anyone knows any reporters or investigators who are willing to investigate please let me know. More welcome to email me if needs to be done in confidence.

its time this issue gets exposed

Mine was also Goldenbet

My bank didn't raise at all and lied about it and got caught out when I asked if they did

How much is your dispute for and which bank

Ingen er ligeglad, ligesom det var for 10 år siden, ligesom Wirecard.

Så længe Visa og Mastercard ikke ændrer noget, vil problemet altid eksistere.

Visa og Mastercard giver banker tilladelse til at behandle betalinger, som de samarbejder med betalingsudbyderne. Normalt er det en ukendt bank, der modtager midlerne eller konverterer dem til krypto i realtid efter at have fratrukket et gebyr. Nogle midler er væk - for altid!

I wouldn’t about legal action be like a criminal complaining to the police that they lost everything they stole from someone else.

Suppose they could use data but usually this is limited to obtaining credit under the persons name/phone contracts, not sure they are in the business of that? Also the amount of data breaches from normal companies probably means we have all had our details stolen anyway we just don’t know about it.

Normalt er det hele bare varm luft.

De kan sende en advokat efter dig, som vil skræmme dig lidt, men det er alt. Det vigtige er ikke at skrive under på noget, de giver dig.

Hvis du truer med sagsanlæg, er det bare varm luft. De skal begrunde deres retskrav i retten, men det kan de ikke, hvis transaktionerne var beregnet til ulovligt spil.

Vigtig:

Gem bevismateriale for en sikkerheds skyld, gem det på en USB-stick, og sørg for, at transaktionerne er relateret til kasinoet. Det er bedst at gemme kasinotransaktionshistorikken med dato og klokkeslæt. På denne måde kan du senere sammenligne transaktionerne fra kreditkortet med dem i kasinoet.

I know CryptoG noted he had to go into police station, but I would imagine this would be rare. If you check back that’s 1 person out of 100s that we just know of so little chance. Now if the company was UKGC and legit and people were charging back to scam them that’s a different story but these are criminals and criminals tend not to raise concerns with law enforcement

Xnet are absolute cowboys - there is zero chance of them ruling against any of their casinos.