De siger, at de ikke har, men har adgang til oplysningerne, plus at de er nødt til at interagere med processoren for at bestemme midlerne, der skal tilføjes til konti, så det er løgn fra deres side at forsøge at aflede ethvert juridisk ansvar, de er faktisk ansvarlige da på trods af at det er ulovligt at bruge tredjeparter til at behandle disse betalinger i nogle jurisdiktioner, har de et ansvar for at sikre, at tredjeparterne handler på en lovlig måde, hvilket de absolut ikke er. Det når ikke, da transaktionen blev foretaget med dem i sidste ende, det er deres ansvar at sørge for, at det er lavet på en sikker og lovlig måde, det gør de ikke, da de bruger tredjeparter uden at kunderne har forudgående viden, hvilket er en GDPR-problem, så bruger de handlende forkerte MCC'er til at omgå gambling-blokke osv. Personligt tror jeg, at disse tredjepartsprocessorer kun er et røgslør, og at kasinoerne selv hvidvasker pengene gennem shell-virksomheder, for eksempel har jeg set mindst 8 forskellige NikoTPF-variationer på dette forum alene med henvisning til Santeda, så har du Falcora osv., som de har brugt, hvorfor skulle en legitim virksomhed bruge så mange forskellige processorer? Det er at hvidvaske penge.
They state they don't but have access to the information, plus have to interact with the processor to determine the funds to add to the accounts, so that's a lie from their side to attempt to deflect any legal responsibility, they are in fact liable as despite it being illegal to use third parties to process these payments in some jurisdictions, they have a responsibility to make sure the third parties are acting in a legal manner, which they most definitely aren't. It's not reaching as the transaction was made with them ultimately, it's their responsibility to make sure it's made in a safe and legal way, they aren't doing that as they're using third parties without the customers having prior knowledge, which is a GDPR issue, then the merchants are using incorrect MCC's to bypass gambling blocks etc. Personally, i believe these third party processors are just a smokescreen, and that the casinos themselves are laundering the money through shell companies, for example i've seen at least 8 different NikoTPF variations on this forum alone in reference to Santeda, then you've got Falcora etc that they've used, why would a legitimate company use so many different processors? It's to money launder.
Automatisk oversættelse: