Fik lige besked fra min bank om, at VISA har taget parti med PYD-behandling i forbindelse med min tilbageførselstvist. Dette til trods for a) PYD's transaktionshistorik sendte de min bank bogstaveligt talt ikke sammenlagt i £ til de transaktioner, jeg havde med dem b) PYD overholdt ikke deres egne T&C'er, men mere åbenlyst;
c) PYD bruger den korrekte gambling MCC-kode i Storbritannien, men har ikke en licens til at operere i Storbritannien, hvilket jeg informerede VISA om med et brev fra UKGC
Den kendelse, jeg fik, var lige så ligefrem som - VISA har dømt til købmandens fordel. Det er det. Ingen begrundelse, ingen ingenting. DET ER DET!
Min bank, der har taget side med mig i at hæve tilbageførslen og accepteret mine beviser, har nu grundlæggende sagt hårde lort.
Hvad er min udvej her? Omudsmand og potentielt en advokat? For at have brugt den korrekte MCC-kode i Storbritannien, skal PYD have bestået en slags stresstest fra VISA for at tillade det?
Og hvorfor skulle VISA nu stadig stille sig på forretningens side, når denne betaling var ulovlig og imod VISas egne T&CS?
Just had word from my bank that VISA have sided with PYD processing over my chargeback dispute. This despite a) PYD's transaction history they sent my bank literally not adding up in £ to the transactions I had with them b) PYD not adhering to their own T&Cs but more glaringly;
c) PYD using the correct gambling MCC Code in the UK but not having a license to operate in the UK, which I informed VISA of with a letter from the UKGC
The ruling notification I got was as blunt as - VISA have ruled in the merchant's favour. That's it. No reasoning, no nothing. THAT'S IT!
M y bank who has sided with me in raising the chargeback and agreed with my evidence have now basically said tough shit.
What's my recourse here? Omudsman and potentially a solicitor? Surely to have used the correct MCC code in the UK, PYD must have passed some kind of stress test from VISA to allow that?
And why would VISA now still be siding with the merchant when this payment was illegal and against VISa's own T&CS?
Automatisk oversættelse: