Hej,
Jeg vil gerne lade folk se dette som en casestudie.
Mine advokater har netop indgivet formularer til den amerikanske domstol mod Trink NV for tyveri. Casinoet forsøgte at stjæle min resterende saldo af absurde årsager i forbindelse med KYC-videoer. Jeg instruerede familiens advokater, og Trink NV nægtede at følge protokollen for forudgående retssager korrekt.
Vi indgav det første sæt retsdokumenter for næsten en måned siden. Du skal betale. Men den betaling går så imod casinoet. Endelig efter en måned har retten udstedt papirerne til casinoet (advokaten sendte mig en e-mail sidste fredag).
Trink NV skal nu indlede sagen, ellers afsiges der en udeblivelsesdom. Du kan derefter betale for fuldbyrdelse.
Hello,
I would like to let people watch this as a case study.
My solicitors have just filed carribiajustice court forms against Trink N.V for theft. The casino attempted to steal my remaining balance due to absurd reasons to do with KYC videos. I instructed family solicitors and Trink N.V refused to engage correctly with pre action protocol.
We filed the first set of court papers nearly a month ago. You do have to pay. However that payment then goes against the casino. Finally after one month the court has issued the papers to the casino (solicitor emailed me last friday).
Trink N.V now have to engage or a default judgement is made. You can then pay for enforcement.





