Kære 22bet casino repræsentant,
Fordi vi havde denne samtale før om flere sager, vil jeg gerne vise dig noget:
Jeg spurgte andenpiloten:
Hvad er chancerne for, at nogen deler min IP-adresse på en mobilenhed inden for en måned?
Dette er svaret:
I betragtning af arten af dynamiske IP-adresser, der bruges af mobilselskaber, er det meget muligt, at en anden kan blive tildelt den samme IP-adresse som dig inden for en måned. Mobiludbydere har typisk en pulje af IP-adresser, som de tildeler til enheder på deres netværk. Når en enhed afbryder forbindelsen til netværket, vender dens IP-adresse tilbage til puljen og kan omtildeles til en anden enhed.
Den nøjagtige sandsynlighed afhænger af størrelsen af operatørens IP-adressepulje og antallet af enheder, der tilslutter og afbryder netværket. Men da omfordelingen sker ofte, er det relativt almindeligt, at IP-adresser genbruges inden for en kort periode, f.eks. en måned.
Chat GPT: (det var lidt vanskeligt, jeg var nødt til at spørge to gange)
Sandsynligheden for, at nogen deler din IP-adresse på en mobilenhed inden for en måned, er relativt lav, f.eks. omkring 1 % til 5 % for de fleste gennemsnitlige brugere. Dette forudsætter typisk adfærd uden at deltage i aktiviteter, der specifikt afslører din IP, som at dele den online eller oprette forbindelse til risikable netværk.
En IP-adresse er ikke unik som et ID, så et match i IP kan ikke alene retfærdiggøre at lukke en konto og konfiskere gevinster. Desuden tjekker kasinoer kun efter dette, når en spiller forsøger at hæve; de undersøger ikke IP-kampe, når spillere taber, selvom de deler den samme IP med andre.
Grundlæggende vækker en IP-match med en anden spiller bekymring, men kræver yderligere undersøgelse af andre faktorer, der kan indikere flere konti.
Det er derfor jeg spurgte:
- Var IP-kampen med kun én anden spiller?
- Er dette sket én gang, som oplyst af spilleren?
- Viser de pågældende regnskaber andre ligheder?
Spilleren bekræftede, at han brugte sin vens WiFi, hvilket er en rimelig forklaring.
Du kan vurdere disse to spillere for at afgøre, om deres forbindelse udelukkende er baseret på IP, eller om der er yderligere faktorer involveret, og derefter træffe en beslutning i overensstemmelse hermed.
At stole udelukkende på reglen om, at to spillere ikke kan dele den samme IP, vil ikke løse denne sag, da det er utilstrækkeligt bevis.
Dear 22bet casino representative,
Because we had this conversation before regarding multiple cases, I would like to show you something:
I asked copilot:
What are the chances that someone will share my IP address on a mobile device within a month?
This is the answer:
Given the nature of dynamic IP addresses used by mobile carriers, it's quite possible that someone else could be assigned the same IP address as you within a month. Mobile carriers typically have a pool of IP addresses that they assign to devices on their network. When a device disconnects from the network, its IP address returns to the pool and can be reassigned to another device.
The exact probability depends on the size of the carrier's IP address pool and the number of devices connecting and disconnecting from the network. However, since the reassignment happens frequently, it's relatively common for IP addresses to be reused within a short period of time, such as a month.
Chat GPT: (it was a bit tricky I needed to ask twice)
The probability of someone sharing your IP address on a mobile device within a month is relatively low, say around 1% to 5% for most average users. This assumes typical behavior without engaging in activities that specifically expose your IP, like sharing it online or connecting to risky networks.
An IP address is not unique like an ID, so a match in IP cannot solely justify closing an account and confiscating winnings. Furthermore, casinos only check for this when a player attempts to withdraw; they do not examine IP matches when players are losing, even if they share the same IP with others.
Essentially, an IP match with another player raises concerns but requires further investigation into other factors that may indicate multiple accounts.
This is why I inquired:
- Was the IP match with only one other player?
- Did this happen just once, as stated by the player?
- Do the accounts in question show any other similarities?
The player confirmed he used his friend's WiFi, which is a reasonable explanation.
You can assess these two players to determine whether their connection is solely based on IP or if there are additional factors involved, and then make a decision accordingly.
Relying solely on the rule that two players cannot share the same IP will not resolve this case, as it is insufficient evidence.
Automatisk oversættelse: