Kære Verpetr,
Tak for dit samarbejde under hele denne klage.
For at præcisere mit tidligere svar, har vi fået at vide, at du brugte en lavrisiko sportsvæddemålsstrategi (at satse store beløb på meget små odds) for at opfylde betingelserne for at modtage en bonus.
Uanset hvad det præcise problem er, bemærk venligst, at selvom du tilsyneladende har overtrådt casinoets vilkår ved at anvende en sådan strategi, afsiger vi ikke eksplicit en dom imod dig. Vi afviser kun klagen med den begrundelse, at vi simpelthen ikke beskæftiger os med spørgsmål relateret til sportsvæddemål og ikke er i stand til at afgive en upartisk dom.
Hvis du havde anvendt en sådan strategi på casinospil, ville vi undersøge sagen og muligvis afgøre sagen i din favør.
Jeg forstår, at dette sandsynligvis ikke er det resultat, du håbede på, især i betragtning af dine bekymringer om casinoets kommunikation under hele processen. På grund af problemets karakter er vi dog tvunget til at lukke klagen som "afvist".
Dear verpetr,
Thank you for your cooperation throughout this complaint.
To clarify my previous response, we have been told you used a low-risk sports-betting strategy (betting high amounts of funds on very small odds) in order to fulfill the conditions required to obtain a bonus.
Whatever the exact issue is, please note that although you seem to have broken the casino's terms by applying such strategy, we are not explicitly ruling against you. We are only rejecting the complaint on the basis, that we simply do not deal with issues related to sports-betting and are unable to offer an impartial verdict.
In case you had employed such a strategy on casino games, we would investigate the issue and possibly rule in your favor.
I understand this is likely not the outcome you were hoping for, especially considering your concerns about the casino’s communication throughout the process. However, due to the nature of the issue, we will be forced to close the complaint as "rejected."
Automatisk oversættelse: