Kære Petronela,
Tak for dit svar.
De ønskede oplysninger findes nedenfor. Jeg skal også være meget tydelig: dette er ikke et mindre forsinkelsesproblem. Baseret på casinoets egne indstillinger for tabsgrænser var dette en fejl i tabsgrænsemekanismens funktion som en egentlig beskyttelseskontrol.
1. Indstillinger for tabsgrænse
Min tabsgrænse på min konto blev sat som følger:
Tabsgrænse: 1.000 USD
Nulstillingsperiode: Hver 24. time kl. 00:00 UTC
Det betyder, at den relevante periode ikke er et rullende 24-timers vindue. Det er den faste nulstillingsperiode, der starter hver dag kl. 00:00 UTC.
For den omstridte sekvens er den korrekte periode:
Fra: 7. april 2026, 00:00 UTC
Til: 7. april 2026, 12:35:07 UTC
I koreansk tid er dette:
Fra: 7. april 2026, kl. 09:00 KST
Til: 7. april 2026, 21:35:07 KST
2. Spilhistorik i den relevante nulstillingsperiode
Alle tidsstempler i min historik vises i koreansk standardtid (UTC+9).
Den afgørende sekvens fandt sted den 7. april 2026 mellem kl. 21:33 og 21:35 KST.
Nøglesekvens i kronologisk rækkefølge:
21:33:18 — +25,21 USD
21:33:24 — +25,21 USD
21:33:30 — -105,07 kr.
21:33:37 — -105,07 kr.
21:33:46 — +25,21 USD
21:33:51 — +12,60 kr.
21:33:54 — +25,21 USD
21:33:57 — +50,43 USD
21:34:00 — +100,87 USD
21:34:05 — +25,21 USD
21:34:09 — +25,21 USD
21:34:19 — -105,07 kr.
21:34:23 — -26,26 USD
21:34:34 — -210,15 USD
21:34:39 — -52,53 kr.
21:34:45 — +100,87 USD
21:34:53 — -210,15 USD
21:35:02 — -420,31 USD
21:35:07 — -$1.132,01
3. Præcis punkt, hvor tabsgrænsen skulle have været udløst
Ved at bruge casinoets egen nulstillingsregel på 00:00 UTC, havde mit løbende tab for den periode allerede nået:
-903,65 USD kl. 21:33:30 KST
-$1.008,72 kl. 21:33:37 KST
I UTC betyder det, at tabsgrænsen på $1.000 allerede var overskredet kl. 12:33:37 UTC den 7. april 2026.
Det er det punkt, hvor tabsgrænsen burde være blevet udløst.
4. Indsatser accepteret efter tabsgrænsen allerede var overskredet
Selvom tabsgrænsen allerede var blevet overskredet, accepterede systemet stadig yderligere indsatser, herunder:
21:34:34 — -210,15 USD
21:34:39 — -52,53 kr.
21:34:53 — -210,15 USD
21:35:02 — -420,31 USD
21:35:07 — -$1.132,01
Dette er kerneproblemet.
Problemet er ikke blot, at den endelige indsats var stor. Problemet er, at kontoen fortsatte med at acceptere indsatser, efter at tabsgrænsen allerede var blevet overskredet i henhold til casinoets egne UTC-nulstillingsregler.
5. Præcis tab inden for den relevante nulstillingsperiode
For nulstillingsperioden, der begynder 7. april 2026 kl. 00:00 UTC og slutter med det endelige omstridte væddemål kl. 12:35:07 UTC, var mit samlede resultat:
Nettotab: -2.799,59 USD
Så under en tabsgrænse på $1.000 tillod systemet tab at fortsætte, indtil det samlede beløb nåede -$2.799,59 i samme nulstillingsperiode.
6. Bekræftelse af grænsestatus
Tabsgrænsen var fastsat på forhånd
Den var aktiv på det tidspunkt
Den nulstilles i henhold til casinoets angivne regel om 00:00 UTC
Jeg hverken deaktiverede eller ændrede den under den relevante session
7. Position
En tabsgrænse er en sikkerhedsforanstaltning for ansvarligt spil. Den skal stoppe yderligere væddemål, når den definerede grænse er nået for den gældende nulstillingsperiode.
I dette tilfælde gør casinoets egen angivne nulstillingslogik fejlen meget tydelig:
Den relevante nulstillingsperiode startede kl. 00:00 UTC
Tabsgrænsen på $1.000 blev overskredet kl. 12:33:37 UTC
Systemet accepterede stadig flere yderligere indsatser bagefter
Det endelige tab for den samme nulstillingsperiode blev -$2.799,59
Det er ikke en funktionel tabsgrænse. Det er en ikke-funktionel kontrol, der præsenteres som en beskyttende sikkerhedsforanstaltning.
Jeg anmoder om, at denne sag vurderes på baggrund af casinoets egen regelformulering og ovenstående tal.
Med venlig hilsen,
degenforlife
Dear Petronela,
Thank you for your reply.
Please find the requested information below. I also need to be very clear: this is not a minor delay issue. Based on the casino’s own loss limit settings, this was a failure of the loss limit mechanism to function as an actual protective control.
1. Loss limit settings
My account loss limit was set as follows:
Loss Limit: US$1,000
Reset Period: Every 24 hours at 00:00 UTC
This means the relevant period is not a rolling 24-hour window. It is the fixed reset period starting each day at 00:00 UTC.
For the disputed sequence, the correct period is:
From: April 7, 2026, 00:00 UTC
To: April 7, 2026, 12:35:07 UTC
In Korean time, this is:
From: April 7, 2026, 09:00 AM KST
To: April 7, 2026, 09:35:07 PM KST
2. Bet history during the relevant reset period
All timestamps in my history are displayed in Korean Standard Time (UTC+9).
The decisive sequence occurred on April 7, 2026, between 9:33 PM and 9:35 PM KST.
Key sequence in chronological order:
9:33:18 PM — +$25.21
9:33:24 PM — +$25.21
9:33:30 PM — -$105.07
9:33:37 PM — -$105.07
9:33:46 PM — +$25.21
9:33:51 PM — +$12.60
9:33:54 PM — +$25.21
9:33:57 PM — +$50.43
9:34:00 PM — +$100.87
9:34:05 PM — +$25.21
9:34:09 PM — +$25.21
9:34:19 PM — -$105.07
9:34:23 PM — -$26.26
9:34:34 PM — -$210.15
9:34:39 PM — -$52.53
9:34:45 PM — +$100.87
9:34:53 PM — -$210.15
9:35:02 PM — -$420.31
9:35:07 PM — -$1,132.01
3. Exact point where the loss limit should have triggered
Using the casino’s own reset rule of 00:00 UTC, my running loss for that period had already reached:
-$903.65 at 9:33:30 PM KST
-$1,008.72 at 9:33:37 PM KST
In UTC, that means the $1,000 loss limit was already exceeded at 12:33:37 UTC on April 7, 2026.
That is the point where the loss limit should have been triggered.
4. Bets accepted after the loss limit had already been exceeded
Despite the fact that the loss limit had already been breached, the system still accepted further wagers, including:
9:34:34 PM — -$210.15
9:34:39 PM — -$52.53
9:34:53 PM — -$210.15
9:35:02 PM — -$420.31
9:35:07 PM — -$1,132.01
This is the core issue.
The problem is not simply that the final bet was large. The problem is that the account continued to accept bets after the loss limit had already been exceeded under the casino’s own UTC reset rules.
5. Exact loss within the relevant reset period
For the reset period beginning April 7, 2026, 00:00 UTC, and ending with the final disputed bet at 12:35:07 UTC, my total result was:
Net loss: -$2,799.59
So under a loss limit of $1,000, the system allowed losses to continue until the total reached -$2,799.59 in the same reset period.
6. Confirmation of the limit status
The loss limit was set in advance
It was active at the time
It reset according to the casino’s stated rule of 00:00 UTC
I did not disable or modify it during the relevant session
7. Position
A loss limit is a responsible gambling safeguard. It is supposed to stop further wagering once the defined threshold is reached for the applicable reset period.
In this case, the casino’s own stated reset logic makes the failure very clear:
The relevant reset period started at 00:00 UTC
The loss threshold of $1,000 was exceeded at 12:33:37 UTC
The system still accepted multiple additional bets afterward
The final loss for that same reset period became -$2,799.59
That is not a functioning loss limit. It is a non-functional control presented as a protective safeguard.
I ask that this case be assessed on the basis of the casino’s own rule wording and the figures above.
Best regards,
degenforlife
Automatisk oversættelse: