Kære Katarina,
Tak for dit svar. Jeg vil besvare dine spørgsmål nedenfor, men jeg vil også gerne give vigtig kontekst, fordi problemet med VIP-chipbonussen ikke er en isoleret hændelse. Jeg har oplevet en række uoverensstemmelser hos Blaze Spins, der samlet set viser et mønster af uklare eller modstridende regler, der kan sætte spillerne i en betydelig ulempe.
For først at besvare dine spørgsmål:
- Jeg har været spiller hos Blaze Spins siden den 22. september 2025.
- Dette var ikke min første bonus hos casinoet.
- Ja, jeg kan give dig min spilhistorik og sender den til dig via e-mail snarest.
Angående det bredere mønster, der er direkte relateret til den foreliggende klage:
Før VIP-chip-hændelsen stødte jeg på flere situationer, hvor casinoets viste information, reklamemateriale og supportforklaringer modsiger hinanden.
Et eksempel kommer fra en reklamemail, jeg modtog for en daglig "uden forpligtelser"-bonus, hvori det stod:
"Eksempel: Indbetal 100 kr. → Spil med 120 kr."
Hæv udbetaling efter blot 1x gennemspilning.
og:
"Tilgængelig dagligt. Maks. bonus $500. Omsætningskrav: 1x. Gælder for alle spil. Ingen indløsningsgrænse."
Der var ingen omtale af nogen "fastlåst" eller låst komponent; men efter at have opfyldt omsætningskravet, informerede supporten mig om, at €10 af min saldo blev betragtet som et ikke-udbetalbart bonusbeløb, selvom min tegnebog viste hele beløbet som udbetalbart med 0 omsætningskrav tilbage. Dette er ikke i overensstemmelse med branchestandarder, hvor begrænsede midler altid er synligt adskilt.
Jeg stødte derefter på følgende problem med gratis spins: Jeg fik tilsendt en reklamemail med 20 gratis spins, men linket var brudt. Da jeg kontaktede livechatten, fik jeg at vide, at spinsene ikke kunne anvendes, fordi "det blander penge, og det er strengt imod casinoets regler." Men i samme øjeblik tillod min konto mig manuelt at aktivere et andet sæt af 50 gratis spins uden nogen form for advarsel, og intet i vilkårene indikerede, at aktivering af disse spins ville skabe en situation med "blandede penge" eller bringe min saldo i fare.
Dette skaber et farligt smuthul for spillerne. For at illustrere: Forestil dig, at en spiller har €100 på sin saldo, aktiverer gratis spins i god tro, vinder €2, derefter fortsætter med at spille med succes og øger sin samlede saldo til €800. Ifølge casinoets fortolkning kan disse €2 i gratis spin-gevinster efterfølgende bruges som grundlag for at nægte en udbetaling af hele de €800, selvom systemet selv tillod aktiveringen. En spiller, der handler i god tro, kan blive straffet, fordi systemet tillader noget, som supporten senere hævder er "imod reglerne".
Mit centrale punkt er dette: Hvis visse midler ikke kan hæves, bør det tydeligt afspejles i tegnebogen. Hvis det er forbudt at blande midler, bør systemet blot forhindre en spiller i at aktivere gratis spins, mens de har en eksisterende saldo. I stedet antyder Blaze Spins' brugerflade, at noget er tilladt, og først bagefter hævder supporten, at det ikke var tilfældet.
Dette bringer mig til det aktuelle problem med VIP-chipbonussen, som følger det samme mønster:
• Bonusvinduet viste 1 dag og 18 timer tilbage.
• Jeg var næsten færdig med at satse.
• Livechat bekræftede, at "alt ser godt ud", og der var ingen tegn på udløb.
• Bonussen forsvandt midt i runden, hvilket fjernede €118,75 fra min saldo.
• Først efter at saldoen forsvandt, fik jeg en forklaring, der modsiger både timeren på skærmen og oplysningerne fra supporten.
I betragtning af de gentagne uoverensstemmelser mellem, hvad Blaze Spins viser spillerne, og hvad de senere håndhæver, er det svært at have tillid til nøjagtigheden af deres forklaringer.
Af disse grunde anmoder jeg om:
• Genindsættelse af VIP-chipbonussen med det korrekte resterende omsætningskrav,
• Genoprettelse af saldoen på 118,75 €, der blev fjernet uden varsel, og
• En klar forklaring på, hvorfor bonussen blev fjernet, på trods af at systemet angav, at den var gyldig i yderligere 18 timer.
Jeg sender dig snart min spilhistorik. Tak for din hjælp.
Dear Katarina,
Thank you for your reply. I will answer your questions below, but I would also like to provide essential context because the issue with the VIP Chip bonus is not an isolated incident. I have experienced a number of inconsistencies at Blaze Spins that, taken together, show a pattern of unclear or contradictory rules that can place players at a significant disadvantage.
To address your questions first:
- I have been a player at Blaze Spins since 22 September 2025.
- This was not my first bonus with the casino.
- Yes, I can provide my game history and will email it to you shortly.
Now, regarding the broader pattern that directly relates to the present complaint:
Before the VIP Chip incident, I encountered several situations where the casino’s displayed information, promotional materials, and support explanations contradicted one another.
One example comes from a promotional email I received for a daily "no strings" bonus, which stated:
"Example: Deposit $100 → Play with $120
Withdraw after just 1x playthrough."
and:
"Available daily. Max bonus $500. Wagering: 1x. Applies to all games. No redemption limit."
There was no mention of any "sticky" or locked component; however, after completing the wagering requirement, support informed me that €10 of my balance was considered a non-withdrawable bonus amount, even though my wallet showed the entire sum as withdrawable with 0 wagering remaining. This is not aligned with industry standards, where restricted funds are always visibly separated.
I then encountered the following issue with free spins: I was sent a promotional email offering 20 free spins, but the link was broken. When I contacted Live Chat, I was told the spins could not be applied because "it’s mixing funds and it’s strictly against casino rules." Yet at that same moment, my account allowed me to manually activate a different set of 50 free spins with no warning of any kind, and nothing in the terms indicated that activating those spins would create a "mixed funds" situation or endanger my balance.
This creates a dangerous loophole for players. To illustrate: imagine a player has €100 in their balance, activates free spins in good faith, wins €2, then continues to play successfully and increases their total balance to €800. Under the casino’s interpretation, those €2 of free spin winnings could be used after the fact as grounds to refuse a payout for the entire €800, even though the system itself allowed the activation. A player acting in good faith could be penalized because the system permits something the support later claims is "against the rules."
My central point is this: if certain funds are non-withdrawable, the wallet should clearly reflect it. If mixing funds is prohibited, the system should simply prevent a player from activating any free spins while they have an existing balance. Instead, Blaze Spins’ interface suggests something is allowed, and only afterwards does support claim it was not.
This brings me to the current issue with the VIP Chip bonus, which follows the same pattern:
• The bonus window displayed 1 day and 18 hours remaining.
• I was nearly finished wagering.
• Live Chat confirmed that "everything looks good" and saw no sign of expiry.
• The bonus vanished mid-round, removing €118.75 from my balance.
• Only after the balance disappeared was I given an explanation that contradicts both the on-screen timer and the information provided by support.
Given the repeated mismatches between what Blaze Spins shows to players and what they later enforce, it is difficult to have confidence in the accuracy of their explanations.
For these reasons, I am requesting:
• Reinstatement of the VIP Chip bonus with the correct remaining wagering requirement,
• Restoration of the €118.75 balance removed without warning, and
• A clear explanation of why the bonus was removed despite the system indicating that it was valid for another day and 18 hours.
I will forward my game history shortly. Thank you for your assistance.
Automatisk oversættelse: