Hej!
Tak for svaret.
Spilleren kontaktede os oprindeligt og anmodede om lukning af sin konto på grund af et påstået spilleproblem. I fuld overensstemmelse med vores procedurer for ansvarligt spil blev kontoen øjeblikkeligt lukket.
Sytten (17) dage senere kontaktede spilleren os igen og oplyste, at hun var i en stabil og klar mental tilstand og ønskede at genåbne sin konto.
Før genåbningen underskrev spilleren frivilligt en formel ansvarsfraskrivelse, der bekræftede at:
- Hun lider ikke af et spilleproblem
- Hun forstår og accepterer fuldt ansvar for enhver fremtidig spilleaktivitet.
Det er vigtigt at bemærke, at dette dokument blev underskrevet, da spilleren ikke havde aktive tab, ingen ventende indsatser og ingen åbne indbetalinger hos casinoet.
Derfor blev beslutningen om at genåbne kontoen truffet i en rolig, rationel og følelsesmæssigt stabil tilstand, fri for enhver påvirkning fra tabsaversion, frustration eller økonomisk pres.
Efter kontoen blev genåbnet, fortsatte spilleren med at foretage nye indbetalinger og spille helt frivilligt. Alle indsatser blev accepteret og afgjort retfærdigt i overensstemmelse med vores vilkår og betingelser. Klagen blev først rejst, efter at disse frivillige indsatser resulterede i tab.
Hvis resultaterne havde været i spillerens favør, ville alle gevinster være blevet udbetalt fuldt ud – som det altid har været vores praksis. Derfor kan en anmodning om at refundere tab, der er et resultat af fair og legitimt spil, ikke berettiges eller anses for gyldig, da det fundamentalt ville fordreje spillenes matematiske integritet og den etablerede husfordel.
Refusion af spiltab, efter at resultaterne er kendte, ville effektivt fjerne balancen mellem risiko og afkast – et kerneprincip, som alt reguleret spil fungerer efter.
Derudover, hvis Casino.Guru mener, at en spiller, der i en rolig og sund sindstilstand underskriver et juridisk dokument, der erklærer fraværet af ethvert spilleproblem, senere bør få refunderet indbetalinger foretaget frivilligt, ville dette ikke falde ind under definitionen af en spilleforstyrrelse.
En sådan adfærd ville i stedet antyde et psykiatrisk eller kognitivt problem, der falder uden for rammerne af standardpolitikker for ansvarligt spil.
Vi er ikke medicinske eller psykiatriske fagfolk, og casinooperatører er heller ikke forpligtet til eller udstyret til at diagnosticere psykiske lidelser hos personer, der præsenterer sig selv som stabile, logiske og selvbevidste – især når der ikke var nogen tab til stede på underskriftstidspunktet.
-Blazebet-holdet
Hello!
Thanks for the answer.
The player initially contacted us requesting account closure due to a claimed gambling problem. In full accordance with our responsible gambling procedures, the account was immediately closed.
Seventeen (17) days later, the player contacted us again, stating that she was in a stable and clear mental condition and wished to reopen her account.
Before reopening, the player voluntarily signed a formal waiver of liability confirming that:
- She does not suffer from a gambling problem
- She understands and accepts full responsibility for any future gaming activity.
It is important to note that this document was signed when the player had no active losses, no pending wagers, and no open deposits with the casino.
Therefore, the decision to reopen the account was made in a calm, rational, and emotionally stable state, free from any influence of loss aversion, frustration, or financial pressure.
After the account was reopened, the player proceeded to make new deposits and play entirely voluntarily. All wagers were accepted and settled fairly in accordance with our Terms and Conditions. The complaint was raised only after these voluntary wagers resulted in losses.
Had the outcomes been in the player’s favor, all winnings would have been paid in full — as has always been our practice. Therefore, a request to refund losses that resulted from fair and legitimate play cannot be justified or considered valid, as it would fundamentally distort the mathematical integrity of the games and the established house edge.
Refunding gameplay losses after outcomes are known would effectively remove the balance between risk and return — a core principle upon which all regulated gaming operates.
Furthermore, if Casino.Guru believes that a player who, in a calm and healthy state of mind, signs a legal document declaring the absence of any gambling problem should later be refunded for deposits made voluntarily — this would not fall under the definition of a gambling disorder.
Such behavior would instead suggest a psychiatric or cognitive issue that falls outside the scope of standard responsible gambling policies.
We are not medical or psychiatric professionals, nor are casino operators required or equipped to diagnose mental health conditions in individuals who present themselves as stable, logical, and self-aware — particularly when no losses were present at the time of signing.
-The Blazebet Team
Automatisk oversættelse: