Kære Martin,
Tak for din fortsatte involvering i denne klage.
Jeg vil gerne respektfuldt præcisere, at min klage ikke udelukkende handler om indbetalinger, udbetalinger eller om, hvorvidt jeg havde en nettogevinst eller et nettotab, efter at min konto blev genåbnet forkert. Jeg mener, at casinoet forsøger at indsnævre omfanget af denne klage for at undgå at adressere det egentlige problem.
Det centrale problem er, at Boho Casino bevidst genåbnede en konto, der var blevet permanent lukket på grund af min ludomani og anmodninger om selvudelukkelse. De har allerede indrømmet, at genåbningen af min konto var en fejl og aldrig burde have fundet sted.
Det faktum, at jeg muligvis har hævet mere, end jeg indbetalte i den specifikke genåbningsperiode, fjerner ikke den forvoldte skade, og det fjerner heller ikke casinoets ansvar i henhold til principperne for ansvarligt spil.
Jeg vil gerne have, at casinoet svarer på følgende spørgsmål:
Hvorfor er transaktionshistorikken begrænset til perioden, der begynder den 29. juli, i stedet for at inkludere min komplette kontohistorik fra den dato, hvor kontoen oprindeligt blev åbnet?
Hvorfor ignoreres mine betydelige historiske indbetalinger og tab, især når disse tab var en af grundene til, at jeg gentagne gange anmodede om at få min konto lukket permanent?
Hvorfor har casinoet undladt at adressere det faktum, at jeg har fremsat flere anmodninger om at lukke min konto på grund af min ludomani, men kontoen senere blev genåbnet, så jeg kan fortsætte med at spille?
Hvis casinoet anerkender, at genåbningen af min konto var en alvorlig fejltagelse, hvordan kan de så konkludere, at der ikke var nogen skade blot på grund af det økonomiske resultat i én isoleret periode?
Denne klage vedrører forbrugerbeskyttelse, ansvarligt spil og casinoets manglende beskyttelse af en sårbar spiller. Spørgsmålet er ikke, om jeg vandt eller tabte efter genåbningen. Spørgsmålet er, at jeg aldrig burde have fået adgang til at spille igen.
Jeg anmoder derfor casinoet om at sørge for:
Min komplette transaktionshistorik fra den dato, kontoen blev åbnet, indtil den endelige lukning, inklusive alle indbetalinger, udbetalinger, bonusser og spilaktivitet.
Kopier af alle optegnelser over kontolukning, selvudelukkelse, ansvarligt spil og genåbning.
En forklaring på, hvordan min konto blev genåbnet på trods af mine tidligere anmodninger om lukning.
Detaljer om den interne undersøgelse, der konkluderede, at dette var en "fejl".
Bekræftelse af, hvilke foranstaltninger der er implementeret for at sikre, at dette ikke kan ske for andre sårbare aktører.
I betragtning af at casinoet allerede har indrømmet, at genåbningen af min konto var en fejl, mener jeg, at det er for tidligt og uretfærdigt af dem at erklære denne sag for løst uden fuldt ud at tage fat på konsekvenserne af bruddet.
Jeg beder respektfuldt Casino Guru om at fortsætte med at undersøge denne sag i sin helhed og ikke begrænse vurderingen udelukkende til de ind- og udbetalinger, der er foretaget efter den fejlagtige genåbning.
Jeg forbeholder mig også retten til at søge yderligere retsmidler gennem de relevante regulerende myndigheder, hvis denne sag afsluttes uden en fuldstændig undersøgelse af casinoets brud på sine forpligtelser til ansvarligt spil og de tab, der er forbundet med denne manglende opfyldelse.
Dear Martin,
Thank you for your continued involvement in this complaint.
I would like to respectfully clarify that my complaint is not solely about the deposits, withdrawals, or whether I made a net profit or loss after my account was wrongly reopened. I believe the casino is attempting to narrow the scope of this complaint to avoid addressing the real issue.
The central issue is that Boho Casino knowingly reopened an account that had been permanently closed due to my gambling addiction and self-exclusion requests. They have already admitted that reopening my account was an error and should never have happened.
The fact that I may have withdrawn more than I deposited during that specific reopening period does not erase the harm caused, nor does it remove the casino’s responsibility under responsible gambling principles.
I would like the casino to answer the following questions:
Why is the transaction history being limited only to the period beginning 29 July, instead of including my complete account history from the date the account was originally opened?
Why are my substantial historical deposits and losses being ignored, particularly when those losses were one of the reasons I repeatedly requested that my account be permanently closed?
Why has the casino failed to address the fact that I made multiple requests to close my account because of my gambling addiction, yet the account was later reopened, allowing me to continue gambling?
If the casino acknowledges that reopening my account was a serious mistake, how can it conclude that there was no harm simply because of the financial outcome during one isolated period?
This complaint concerns consumer protection, responsible gambling obligations, and the casino’s failure to protect a vulnerable player. The issue is not whether I won or lost after the reopening. The issue is that I should never have been given access to gamble again.
I am therefore requesting that the casino provide:
My complete transaction history from the date the account was first opened until its final closure, including all deposits, withdrawals, bonuses, and gaming activity.
Copies of all account closure, self-exclusion, responsible gambling, and reopening records.
An explanation of how my account was reopened despite my previous closure requests.
Details of the internal investigation that concluded this was an "error."
Confirmation of what measures have been implemented to ensure this cannot happen to other vulnerable players.
Given the casino has already admitted that reopening my account was a mistake, I believe it is premature and unfair for them to declare this matter resolved without fully addressing the consequences of that breach.
I respectfully ask Casino Guru to continue investigating this matter in its entirety and not limit the assessment solely to the deposits and withdrawals made after the erroneous reopening.
I also reserve my right to pursue additional remedies through the appropriate regulatory authorities if this matter is closed without a full investigation into the casino’s breach of its responsible gambling obligations and the losses connected to that failure.
Automatisk oversættelse: