Tak for dette.
Selvom jeg sætter stor pris på gestussen, er dine kommentarer desværre også langt fra sandheden.
Dine bredere vilkår, som jeg har taget som et øjebliksbillede den 4. juli, angav oprindeligt
14.1.4. Følgende spil bidrager ikke til velkomstbonussen: Fashion TV Nations League, Swipein, Fruit Machine X25, Dino, Chicken, Wheel, Ice field, Aqua rings, Teleport, Plinko, Keno, Hilo, Dice. Sportsbook-begivenheder.
Oplysningerne der nu vises er:
14.1.4. Følgende spil bidrager ikke til velkomstbonussen: Fashion TV Nations League, Swipein, Fruit Machine X25, Dino, Chicken, Wheel, Ice field, Aqua rings, Teleport, Plinko, Keno, Hilo, Dice. Bidraget til omsætningskravet afhænger også af RTP (Return to Player) for hvert spil: spil med en RTP over 99,51% bidrager med 5%, spil mellem 99%–99,51% bidrager med 20%, spil mellem 98%–99% bidrager med 70%, spil mellem 97%–98% bidrager med 90%, og alle spil under 97% bidrager med 100% til omsætningskravet.
Så dette er først blevet tilføjet efter hændelsen, på trods af at din forklaring ovenfor angiver, at det har været der hele tiden, og at det eneste problem er, at det ikke fremgår tydeligt af bonusvilkårene. Dette er slet ikke tilfældet, da det aldrig fremgik af dine generelle vilkår, som illustreret her.
Jeg forstår, at andre casinoer kan have andre vilkår for deres bonusser, men det er ikke relevant for de vilkår, I har indført. Hvis I indfører noget i jeres vilkår, som spillere skal gøre, skal I overholde disse vilkår. I kan ikke ændre dem, og heller ikke lyve fuldstændigt og påstå, at de har været forskellige hele tiden.
Det er virkelig skuffende, at du tilsyneladende, ligesom du gjorde i vores oprindelige samtaler, ændrer sandheden endnu en gang, men nu ændrer du endda dine vilkår, hvilket i punktet nedenfor 14.1.2 endda siger, at du forbeholder dig retten til at ændre dine vilkår uden at det berører væddemål eller igangværende spil, hvilket du har gjort.
Du havde mulighed for at være ærlig og sige "du har ret, og vi er nødt til at justere vores vilkår for fremtidige kunder", men i stedet har du forsøgt at lyve og givet en symbolsk forhøjelse af en del af bonussen, som burde have været min fuldt ud i første omgang, ifølge dine oprindelige vilkår.
Dette er fuldstændig uretfærdigt og har fået mig til at miste al tillid til, at jeres casino overholder jeres egne vilkår.

Thanks for this.
Whilst I appreciate the gesture very slightly, unfortunately your comments are also far from the truth.
Your wider terms, which I have taken as a snapshot on 4th July, originally stated
14.1.4. The following games do not contribute to the welcome bonus wager: Fashion TV Nations League, Swipein, Fruit Machine X25, Dino, Chicken, Wheel, Ice field, Aqua rings, Teleport, Plinko, Keno, Hilo, Dice. Sportsbook events.
The information now showing is:
14.1.4. The following games do not contribute to the welcome bonus wager: Fashion TV Nations League, Swipein, Fruit Machine X25, Dino, Chicken, Wheel, Ice field, Aqua rings, Teleport, Plinko, Keno, Hilo, Dice. Contribution to wagering also depends on the RTP (Return to Player) value of each game: games with RTP above 99.51% contribute 5%, those between 99%–99.51% contribute 20%, games between 98%–99% contribute 70%, games between 97%–98% contribute 90%, and all games below 97% contribute 100% towards the wagering requirement.
So this has only been added, after the event, despite your narrative above indicating it was there all along and that the only issue is that it's not clear in the bonus terms. This is not the case at all as it never appeared in your general terms as illustrated here.
I appreciate that other casinos may have different terms to their bonuses but that is not relevant to your terms which you have put in place. If you put something in your terms, as players have to do, you have to keep to those terms. You cannot change them, nor completely lie and claim they were different all along.
It’s really disappointing that you appear, as you did in our original conversations, to be altering the truth once again, but now you are even altering your terms, which on the point below 14.1.2 even says you reserve the right to alter your terms without prejudice to bets or games in play, which you have done.
You had the opportunity to come clean and say 'you're right and we need to adjust our terms for future customers' but instead you have tried to lie and provided a nominal uplift to part of the bonus which should have been mine fully in the first place, as per your original terms.
This is completely unfair and has made me lose all trust in your casino to abide by your own terms.

Automatisk oversættelse: