Kære Veronika,
Tak for din henvendelse. Jeg vil gerne give dig nogle yderligere oplysninger vedrørende min sag.
Min konto hos CrownGreen er stadig ikke blevet lukket. Den er i øjeblikket aktiv, og jeg kan stadig få adgang til og bruge kontoen, herunder foretage indbetalinger og spille.
Den 14. august 2026 anmodede jeg for første gang eksplicit om, at min konto blev lukket. Jeg informerede også tydeligt casinoet om, at jeg har en ludomani/et problem med spil, og at jeg ønskede min konto lukket af denne grund.
I stedet for øjeblikkeligt at lukke min konto eller anvende selvudelukkelse, forsøgte casinoet at beholde mig som kunde og tilbød mig alternative løsninger. I denne periode forblev min konto fuldt aktiv, og jeg kunne stadig foretage indbetalinger og spille.
Jeg kontaktede dem flere gange bagefter og insisterede gentagne gange på, at jeg ønskede min konto permanent lukket. Trods mine gentagne anmodninger lukkede de ikke kontoen.
Til sidst fortalte de mig, at jeg for at lukke min konto først skulle fremvise en række dokumenter, herunder:
en kopi af mit ID/pas,
bevis for min bopælsadresse,
et skærmbillede af min sidste indbetaling,
og et dokument vedrørende formueskilden/skatterelateret.
De fortalte mig, at min konto først skulle verificeres, og at de først kunne fortsætte med at lukke den efter verifikationsprocessen.
Jeg forstår ikke, hvorfor jeg skulle gennemføre en fuld verifikation og fremvise et dokument om formuekilde for at få min spillekonto lukket, især efter at jeg udtrykkeligt havde informeret dem om, at jeg har et spilleproblem og anmodet om selvudelukkelse.
Jeg fremlagde ikke disse dokumenter, fordi min prioritet blot var at stoppe med at spille og få kontoen lukket.
Det, der bekymrer mig mest, er, at selv nu, på trods af mine gentagne anmodninger og på trods af at have informeret dem om min ludomani, forbliver kontoen aktiv, og jeg kan stadig bruge den.
Jeg har skærmbilleder og korrespondance, der dokumenterer alt dette, inklusive min oprindelige anmodning, casinoets svar og deres efterfølgende anmodninger om dokumenter. Jeg sender gerne alt dette til dig til gennemgang.
Jeg ville sætte pris på, hvis du specifikt kunne vurdere, om min oprindelige anmodning bør betragtes som en selvudelukkelsesanmodning snarere end blot en standardanmodning om kontolukning, og om casinoet burde have begrænset min konto fra yderligere indbetalinger og spil, efter jeg informerede dem om min ludomani.
Dear Veronika,
Thank you for getting back to me. I would like to provide you with some additional details regarding my case.
My account with CrownGreen has still not been closed. It is currently active, and I am still able to access and use the account, including making deposits and gambling.
On 14 August 2026, for the first time, I explicitly requested that my account be closed. I also clearly informed the casino that I have a gambling addiction/problem with gambling and that I wanted my account closed for this reason.
Instead of immediately closing my account or applying self-exclusion, the casino tried to keep me as a customer and offered me alternative solutions. During this period, my account remained fully active and I was still able to make deposits and gamble.
I contacted them several times afterwards and repeatedly insisted that I wanted my account permanently closed. Despite my repeated requests, they did not close the account.
Eventually, they told me that in order to close my account, I first had to provide a number of documents, including:
a copy of my ID/passport,
proof of my residential address,
a screenshot of my last deposit,
and a Source of Wealth/tax-related document.
They told me that my account first had to be verified and that only after the verification process could they proceed with closing it.
I do not understand why I would need to complete a full verification and provide a Source of Wealth document in order to have my gambling account closed, especially after I had explicitly informed them that I have a gambling problem and requested self-exclusion.
I did not provide these documents because my priority was simply to stop gambling and have the account closed.
What concerns me most is that even now, despite my repeated requests and despite informing them about my gambling addiction, the account remains active and I can still use it.
I have screenshots and correspondence documenting all of this, including my original request, the casino's responses, and their subsequent requests for documents. I am happy to forward all of this to you for review.
I would appreciate it if you could specifically assess whether my original request should be considered a self-exclusion request rather than merely a standard account closure request, and whether the casino should have restricted my account from further deposits and gambling after I informed them about my gambling addiction.
Automatisk oversættelse: