Hej
Du har bekræftet, at dine servicevilkår ikke kræver nogen specifik emnelinje for anmodninger om selvudelukkelse. Derfor bør ansvaret for at behandle sådanne anmodninger hurtigt ikke afhænge af en intern regel, der ikke er formelt dokumenteret.
Selvom jeg forstår, at automatiserede systemer hjælper med at administrere køer, er det i sidste ende virksomhedens ansvar at sikre, at kritiske anmodninger – såsom selvudelukkelse – identificeres og prioriteres uanset e-mailtråden eller emnelinjen. Jeg som kunde bør ikke bære konsekvenserne af interne routingproblemer.
Min anmodning blev sendt til jeres officielle support-e-mailadresse som anvist. Dette opfylder min forpligtelse som kunde. Hvordan e-mails behandles internt er uden for min kontrol og bør ikke forsinke udførelsen af en vigtig handling som f.eks. kontolåsning.
Hvis en specifik formulering i emnelinjen er afgørende for prioriteringen, skal dette tydeligt fremgå af jeres officielle retningslinjer eller servicevilkår – ikke kun kommunikeres uformelt af supportteams. Uden sådan dokumentation kan det ikke med rimelighed forventes, at kunderne overholder reglerne.
Jeg finder det ret chokerende, at en virksomhed, der opererer i spillebranchen, ikke giver klare og tilgængelige oplysninger på sin hjemmeside om, hvad en spiller skal gøre, hvis de oplever ludomani eller ønsker at udelukke sig selv. Dette er ikke kun overraskende – det rejser alvorlig bekymring over jeres engagement i ansvarlig spilpraksis.
Som licenseret operatør forventes det, at du prioriterer spillerbeskyttelse og gør selvudelukkelsesprocedurer og supportressourcer meget synlige og lette at få adgang til. Fraværet af sådanne oplysninger på dine officielle kanaler er uacceptabelt og strider mod bredt anerkendte standarder for ansvarligt spil.
Hi
You have confirmed that your Terms of Service do not require any specific subject line for self-exclusion requests. Therefore, the responsibility for processing such requests promptly should not depend on an internal rule that is not formally documented.
While I understand that automated systems help manage queues, it is ultimately the company’s responsibility to ensure that critical requests—such as self-exclusion—are identified and prioritized regardless of the email thread or subject line. Me as a customer should not bear the consequences of internal routing issues.
My request was sent to your official support email address, as instructed. This fulfills my obligation as a customer. How emails are processed internally is beyond my control and should not delay the execution of an important action like account locking.
If specific wording in the subject line is essential for prioritization, this must be clearly stated in your official guidelines or Terms of Service—not only communicated informally by support teams. Without such documentation, customers cannot reasonably be expected to comply.
I find it quite shocking that a company operating in the gambling industry does not provide clear and accessible information on its website about what a player should do if they are experiencing gambling addiction or wish to self-exclude. This is not only surprising—it raises serious concerns about your commitment to responsible gambling practices.
As a licensed operator, it is expected that you prioritize player protection and make self-exclusion procedures and support resources highly visible and easy to access. The absence of such information on your official channels is unacceptable and contradicts widely recognized standards for responsible gaming.
Redigeret
Automatisk oversættelse: