Kære herre eller fru,
Jeg indsender denne formelle klage vedrørende alvorlige brud på licensregler og forpligtelser vedrørende ansvarligt spil begået af jeres licenserede operatør.
Jeg anmodede udtrykkeligt om permanent livstidsudelukkelse uden mulighed for at genåbne min konto – nogensinde. Jeg fremsatte denne anmodning flere gange, og jeres repræsentanter gav mig klare skriftlige forsikringer om, at min konto ville blive lukket permanent og aldrig kunne genåbnes.
Trods disse forsikringer blev min konto genåbnet cirka en time senere uden nogen form for verifikation eller kommunikation fra jeres side. Som følge heraf kunne jeg få adgang til kontoen igen og tabte omkring €500. Dette er en klar og direkte overtrædelse af jeres forpligtelser til ansvarligt spil og jeres egne erklærede politikker.
Jeres personale har også meddelt, at der ikke vil blive udstedt nogen refusion. Jeg kræver derfor formelt refusion af de cirka 500 €, der er gået tabt, efter at min konto uretmæssigt blev genåbnet. Denne refusion er den eneste kompensation, jeg anmoder om.
Derudover har jeg grund til at tro, at operatøren har givet forkerte oplysninger om RTP-værdier (Return to Player). Casinoet hævdede, at Play'n GO bestemmer RTP-indstillingerne, og at operatøren ikke har nogen kontrol over dem. Ifølge Play'n GO vælger hvert casino dog uafhængigt sin RTP-version. Operatøren hævder også at bruge 96%-versionen, men beviser tyder på, at versioner med lavere RTP kan være i brug, især for Pragmatic Play-spilleautomater.
Jeg anmoder derfor om, at licensmyndigheden eller Casino Guru undersøger disse spørgsmål yderligere.
Selvom Curaçaos licensramme (LOK – National Ordinance on Games of Chance) for nylig er blevet styrket for at forhindre sådan misbrug, er det tydeligt, at visse operatører fortsat tilsidesætter disse forpligtelser. Dette casino ser ud til at være et af dem.
Derfor indsender jeg denne klage offentligt til Casino Guru, jeres licensudbyder, og AskGamblers til gennemgang og offentliggørelse.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am submitting this formal complaint concerning serious breaches of licensing regulations and responsible gambling obligations by your licensed operator.
I explicitly requested a permanent lifetime self-exclusion, without any possibility of reopening my account — ever. I made this request multiple times, and your representatives gave me firm written assurances that my account would be permanently closed and could never be reopened.
Despite these assurances, my account was reopened approximately one hour later, without any verification or communication from your side. As a result, I was able to access the account again and lost around €500. This is a clear and direct violation of responsible gambling commitments and of your own stated policies.
Your staff have also stated that no refund will be issued. I therefore formally demand reimbursement of the approximately €500 lost after my account was wrongfully reopened. This refund is the sole compensation I am requesting.
In addition, I have reason to believe that the operator has misrepresented information regarding RTP (Return to Player) values. The casino claimed that Play’n GO determines the RTP settings and that the operator has no control over them. However, according to Play’n GO, each casino independently selects its RTP version. The operator also claims to use the 96% version, but evidence suggests that lower RTP versions may be in use, particularly for Pragmatic Play slots.
I therefore request that the licensing authority or Casino Guru investigate these issues further.
Although Curacao’s licensing framework (LOK – National Ordinance on Games of Chance) has recently been strengthened to prevent such misconduct, it is evident that certain operators continue to disregard these obligations. This casino appears to be one of them.
Accordingly, I am submitting this complaint publicly to Casino Guru, your licensing provider, and AskGamblers for review and publication.
Automatisk oversættelse: