Kære Horus Casino,
Tak for at du har fremlagt de yderligere oplysninger og beviser.
Jeg anerkender den meddelelse, der vises til spilleren; den angiver dog ikke eksplicit, at spilleren skal eller skal hæve pengene, og den indikerer heller ikke, at de maksimale udbetalingsgrænser forbliver gældende for yderligere spil, på trods af at bonusindsatsen er gennemført, og de indledende saldojusteringer er foretaget.
Som jeg tidligere nævnte, mener vi i henhold til vores Fair Gambling Code, at hvis en spiller vælger at fortsætte med at spille med pengene og accepterer risikoen, skal de have ret til eventuelle gevinster, de optjener, ligesom de ville have, hvis de selv havde indsat disse penge på kontoen.
Selvom spilleren faktisk risikerede pengene, var deres chance for at vinde begrænset, hvilket resulterede i en urimelig situation, fordi spilleren tilsyneladende ikke var korrekt informeret om de resterende maksimale udbetalingsgrænser.
Jeg vil gerne gentage, at branchen er i udvikling, og mange casinoer implementerer nu bonusrelaterede restriktioner direkte på softwareniveau – en tilgang, vi støtter kraftigt. Denne situation kunne relativt let have været undgået ved at implementere passende foranstaltninger i stedet for at lægge byrden på spilleren.
Jeg har svært ved at identificere nogen urimelig fordel, som spilleren har opnået ved at vælge ikke at hæve pengene og i stedet (helt forståeligt) vælge at prøve lykken med yderligere spil. Hvis omstændighederne var omvendte, ville I så overveje at refundere de tabte penge? Jeg håber, I forstår pointen, jeg prøver at formidle.
Med dette i tankerne beder vi dig venligst om at genoverveje din beslutning og undersøge, om der kan opnås en gensidigt acceptabel og forholdsmæssig løsning.
Dear Horus Casino,
Thank you for providing the additional information and evidence.
I acknowledge the message displayed to the player; however, it does not explicitly state that the player should or must withdraw the funds, nor does it indicate that the maximum payout limits remain in effect for further gameplay, despite the bonus wagering being completed and the initial balance adjustments having been made.
As I previously mentioned, according to our Fair Gambling Code, we believe that if a player chooses to continue playing with the funds and accepts the risk, they should be entitled to any winnings they accrue, just as they would be if they had deposited those funds into the account themselves.
While the player was indeed risking the funds, their opportunity to win was limited, which resulted in an unfair situation because, as it seems, the player was not appropriately informed of the remaining maximum payout limits.
I would like to reiterate that the industry is evolving, and many casinos are now implementing bonus-related restrictions directly at the software level—an approach we strongly endorse. This situation could have been relatively easily avoided, by implementing appropriate measures, rather than placing the burden on the player.
I find it difficult to identify any unfair advantage gained by the player by choosing not to withdraw the funds and instead opting (quite understandably) to try their luck with additional gameplay. If the circumstances were reversed, would you consider refunding the lost funds? I hope you understand the point I'm trying to convey.
With this in mind, we kindly ask that you reconsider your decision and explore whether a mutually acceptable and proportionate resolution can be reached.
Automatisk oversættelse: