Hej
Pointene vedrørende spilleskade blev fremsat i livechatten, hvilket jeg på det tidspunkt ikke troede, jeg behøvede at tage et skærmbillede af, da jeg håbede, at de ville lukke min konto. De kan da se ud fra det indbetalte beløb, tidspunkterne og hyppigheden, at der er noget galt? Har de ikke også en pligt til at udvise omsorg over for spillere til at tjekke dette, når de ser et mønster i indbetalinger?
Min indbetalingsaktivitet viste klare og gentagne "skademarkører", herunder flere indbetalinger foretaget inden for en meget kort periode, eskalerende forbrug og tydeligt tab af kontrol. Disse adfærdsmønstre er bredt anerkendt i hele spillebranchen som indikatorer for potentielt problemspil.
I henhold til standardprincipper for ansvarligt spil – herunder dem, der er afspejlet i UK Gambling Commissions kodeks for socialt ansvar og lignende rammer, der anvendes internationalt – skal operatører:
Identificer højrisikoadfærd gennem automatiseret overvågning
Interager med kunden gennem en meningsfuld "kundeinteraktion"
Handl ved at suspendere indbetalinger, anvende grænser eller anmode om kilde til midler/formue
Begræns markedsføringen, indtil risikoen er vurderet
Lizaro Casino undlod at foretage nogen af disse skridt. Trods flere hurtige indbetalinger på én nat greb de ikke ind, kontaktede mig ikke, begrænsede ikke min konto og anvendte ingen form for beskyttelse. De tillod kontinuerlige indbetalinger i en periode med klart tab af kontrol.
Brud på Lizaro Casinos egne vilkår og betingelser
Lizaros vilkår og betingelser angiver, at operatøren kan suspendere konti, blokere indbetalinger, håndhæve indbetalingsgrænser og anvende ansvarligt spil, når der opdages skadelig eller højrisikoadfærd. Disse bestemmelser findes for at beskytte kunder, der viser tegn på spilleskade.
Mit indbetalingsmønster opfyldte tydeligvis kriterierne for intervention i henhold til deres egne politikker for ansvarligt spil og suspension. Ved ikke at anvende disse beskyttelser overtrådte Lizaro Casino sine egne kontraktlige forpligtelser og undlod at opfylde den pligt til omhu, de hævder at udvise.
De kunne se alt dette og svigtede mig som kunde. Hvorfor behøver de ikke at overholde nogen regler?
Dette udgør et brud på både branchestandardforventningerne og deres egne vilkår og betingelser.
Den konstante anmodning om at lukke en konto burde være indlysende for dem
Hi
the gambling harm points were made in live chat which at the time I did not think I needed to screenshot as I hoped they would close my account. Surely they can see by the amount deposited, times and frequency that something wasn’t right? Also do they not have a duty of care towards players to check on this when they see a pattern of depositing?
My deposit activity showed clear and repeated "markers of harm," including multiple deposits made within a very short period of time, escalating spending, and obvious loss of control. These behaviours are widely recognised across the gambling industry as indicators of potential problem gambling.
Under standard Responsible Gambling principles — including those reflected in the UK Gambling Commission’s Social Responsibility Code and similar frameworks used internationally — operators are required to:
Identify high‑risk behaviour through automated monitoring
Interact with the customer through a meaningful "Customer Interaction"
Act by suspending deposits, applying limits, or requesting Source of Funds/Wealth
Restrict marketing until the risk is assessed
Lizaro Casino failed to take any of these steps. Despite multiple rapid‑fire deposits in a single night, they did not intervene, did not contact me, did not restrict my account, and did not apply any form of protection. They allowed continuous deposits during a period of clear loss of control.
Breach of Lizaro Casino’s Own Terms & Conditions
Lizaro’s Terms & Conditions state that the operator may suspend accounts, block deposits, enforce deposit limits, and apply Responsible Gambling measures when harmful or high‑risk behaviour is detected. These provisions exist to protect customers who show signs of gambling harm.
My deposit pattern clearly met the criteria for intervention under their own Responsible Gambling and Suspension policies. By failing to apply these protections, Lizaro Casino breached their own contractual obligations and failed to uphold the duty of care they claim to provide.
they could see all of this and failed me as a customer. Why do they not have to abide by any regulations?
This constitutes a breach of both industry‑standard expectations and their own Terms & Conditions.
the constant asking to close an account should be obvious to them
Automatisk oversættelse: