Hej Attila,
Tak for din gennemgang af min klage.
Jeg tror, der er en væsentlig misforståelse i min sag.
Jeg bestrider ikke, at cashback-bonussen havde et omsætningskrav på 10 gange og en maksimal gevinstgrænse på 10 gange, mens bonussen var aktiv.
Min klage vedrører det faktum, at udbetalingen på €4.000 blev genereret, efter at cashback-indsatsen allerede var gennemført.
LuckyVibe har givet mig en komplet GDPR/DSAR ZIP-fil med navnet DSAR_O_128920_luckyvibe.zip. Den indeholder blandt andet bonus_issues.csv, bets.csv og payments.csv. Disse er LuckyVibes egne interne optegnelser, og de gør det muligt at rekonstruere den nøjagtige rækkefølge.
Den relevante cashback-bonus var €38,39.
Derfor:
10x omsætningskrav = €383,90
I bonus_issues.csv registrerer LuckyVibe:
Daglig cashback på niveau 2 – 38,39 €
Indsats: €384,40 / €383,90 (100%)
Fase: "Væddemål afsluttet"
Opdateret kl.: 2026-09-03 03:59:34
Det sidste væddemål, der stadig er markeret med bonussen, er væddemåls-ID 125959776:
Saldo før: €101,09
Indsats: €1,60
Saldo efter: 99,49 €
Bonusudgave: Daglig cashback på niveau 2
Den sluttede klokken 03:59:34.680.
Det allernæste væddemål, ID 125959779, startede kl. 03:59:34.821, kun 0,141 sekunder senere:
Saldo før: €99,49
Bonusproblem: tom / ingen bonus tildelt
Det betyder, at ifølge LuckyVibes egne optegnelser blev cashback-omsætningen gennemført, da min saldo kun var €99,49.
Dette er afgørende, fordi €99,49 var langt under den maksimale gevinstgrænse på €383,90. Der var derfor ingen overskydende gevinster at hæve, da cashback-omsætningen sluttede.
Derefter fortsatte jeg med at spille uden at cashback-bonussen blev tildelt mine indsatser. Min saldo steg til €393,56, og jeg anmodede om en udbetaling på €300 kl. 04:44:05.
Senere blev separate ældre belønninger spillet og tabt. Spilhistorikken viser, at min spilbare saldo til sidst faldt til kun €0,02.
Kl. 06:22:03 blev den tidligere hævning på €300 tilbagekaldt.
Det første væddemål efter denne tilbagekaldelse startede med:
Saldo før: €300,02
Bonusnummer: tomt
Fra det tidspunkt og indtil udbetalingen af €4.000 indeholder LuckyVibes data 1.636 indsatser, og hver enkelt har et tomt Bonusudstedelsesfelt.
Disse senere væddemål genererede de omstridte gevinster.
For eksempel viser LuckyVibes egne bettingdata:
€5 indsats → €2.385,50 udbetaling → saldo steg fra €546,02 til €2.926,52
€10 indsats → €518 udbetaling → saldo øget til €3.439,27
€10 indsats → €648 udbetaling → saldo øget til €3.769,27
€10 indsats → €1.278 udbetaling → saldo øget til €4.341,57
€20 indsats → €1.124 udbetaling → saldo øget til €4.224,57
Ingen af disse væddemål har nogen bonus tildelt i LuckyVibes egne registre.
Min saldo nåede senere et maksimum på €4.690,57 og var €4.445,57 efter min sidste indsats før udbetalingen.
Jeg anmodede derefter om udbetalingen af €4.000 kl. 08:51:17.
Derfor er den relevante sekvens ifølge LuckyVibes egne data:
€38,39 cashback → omsætning gennemført til €99,49 → status "Omsætning udført" → bonustildeling forsvinder → €300 udbetaling → andre belønninger efterfølgende tabt → saldo €0,02 → €300 udbetaling tilbagekaldt → saldo €300,02 uden tildelt bonus → 1.636 indsatser uden bonustildeling → saldoen vokser til over €4.000 → €4.000 udbetaling anmodet.
LuckyVibe tillod efterfølgende kun €383,98 og konfiskerede €3.616,02 ved at anvende den tidligere cashback-maksimumsgevinstgrænse på de senere gevinster.
Jeg anmoder derfor respektfuldt om, at klagen ikke lukkes udelukkende på grund af eksistensen af klausulen om maksimal gevinst på 10 gange.
Det centrale spørgsmål er, om denne klausul stadig kan anvendes på gevinster genereret efter at omsætningskravet allerede var opfyldt, og efter at LuckyVibes eget system stoppede med at tildele cashback-bonussen til mine væddemål.
Jeg kan levere den komplette originale DSAR ZIP-fil leveret af LuckyVibe, inklusive de ovennævnte CSV-filer, så Casino Guru uafhængigt kan verificere hvert tal og tidsstempel.
Mange tak for at du kiggede nærmere på dette specifikke punkt.
Hello Attila,
thank you for reviewing my complaint.
I believe there is an important misunderstanding regarding my case.
I am not disputing that the cashback bonus had a 10x wagering requirement and a 10x maximum win limit while the bonus was active.
My complaint concerns the fact that the €4,000 withdrawal was generated after the cashback wagering had already been completed.
LuckyVibe has provided me with a complete GDPR/DSAR ZIP file named DSAR_O_128920_luckyvibe.zip. It contains, among other things, bonus_issues.csv, bets.csv and payments.csv. These are LuckyVibe’s own internal records, and they allow the exact sequence to be reconstructed.
The relevant cashback bonus was €38.39.
Therefore:
10x wagering requirement = €383.90
In bonus_issues.csv, LuckyVibe records:
Level 2 Daily Cashback – €38.39
Wager: €384.40 / €383.90 (100%)
Stage: "Wager Done"
Updated at: 2026-09-03 03:59:34
The final bet still marked with the bonus is bet ID 125959776:
Balance before: €101.09
Bet: €1.60
Balance after: €99.49
Bonus Issue: Level 2 Daily Cashback
It finished at 03:59:34.680.
The very next bet, ID 125959779, started at 03:59:34.821, only 0.141 seconds later:
Balance before: €99.49
Bonus Issue: empty / no bonus assigned
This means that, according to LuckyVibe’s own records, the cashback wagering was completed when my balance was only €99.49.
This is crucial because €99.49 was far below the €383.90 maximum win limit. There were therefore no excess winnings to remove when the cashback wagering ended.
I then continued playing without the cashback bonus being assigned to my bets. My balance increased to €393.56, and I requested a €300 withdrawal at 04:44:05.
Later, separate older rewards were played and lost. The betting history shows that my playable balance eventually fell to only €0.02.
At 06:22:03, the previous €300 withdrawal was recalled.
The first bet after this recall started with:
Balance before: €300.02
Bonus Issue: empty
From that point until the €4,000 withdrawal, LuckyVibe’s data contains 1,636 bets, and every single one has an empty Bonus Issue field.
These later bets generated the winnings in dispute.
For example, LuckyVibe’s own betting data shows:
€5 bet → €2,385.50 payoff → balance increased from €546.02 to €2,926.52
€10 bet → €518 payoff → balance increased to €3,439.27
€10 bet → €648 payoff → balance increased to €3,769.27
€10 bet → €1,278 payoff → balance increased to €4,341.57
€20 bet → €1,124 payoff → balance increased to €4,224.57
All of these bets have no bonus assigned in LuckyVibe’s own records.
My balance later reached a maximum of €4,690.57 and was €4,445.57 after my final bet before the withdrawal.
I then requested the €4,000 withdrawal at 08:51:17.
Therefore, the relevant sequence according to LuckyVibe’s own data is:
€38.39 cashback → wagering completed at €99.49 → status "Wager Done" → bonus assignment disappears → €300 withdrawal → other rewards subsequently lost → balance €0.02 → €300 withdrawal recalled → balance €300.02 with no bonus assigned → 1,636 bets without any bonus assignment → balance grows above €4,000 → €4,000 withdrawal requested.
LuckyVibe subsequently allowed only €383.98 and confiscated €3,616.02 by applying the previous cashback maximum-win limit to the later winnings.
I therefore respectfully ask that the complaint not be closed solely on the existence of the 10x maximum win clause.
The key question is whether that clause can still be applied to winnings generated after the wagering requirement had already been completed and after LuckyVibe’s own system stopped assigning the cashback bonus to my bets.
I can provide the complete original DSAR ZIP file supplied by LuckyVibe, including the CSV files mentioned above, so that Casino Guru can independently verify every figure and timestamp.
Thank you very much for taking another look at this specific point.
Automatisk oversættelse: