Kære Veronika,
Jeg vil gerne give endnu en vigtig opdatering vedrørende min klage.
I dag kontaktede jeg MostBet support igen. For første gang forklarede en supportrepræsentant, hvad der var sket internt.
Han informerede mig om, at de tidligere undersøgelser vedrørende mine genåbnede anmodninger allerede var blevet afsluttet af Finansafdelingen med præcis samme konklusion som før: Ifølge dem var hævningerne blevet behandlet korrekt.
Men efter jeg indsendte min officielle PDF-kontoudtog, indledte en anden repræsentant en ny økonomisk undersøgelse, som i øjeblikket er under gennemgang igen.
Det, der bekymrer mig mest, er, at dette er præcis det samme mønster, der opstod i min tidligere klage vedrørende 17.345 EGP, hvilket Casino Guru allerede er bekendt med.
Trods at levere:
Officielle PDF-kontoudtog,
Videooptagelser, der tydeligt beviser, at de omstridte midler aldrig nåede min tegnebog.
Alle efterspurgte dokumenter,
Finansafdelingen har endnu engang fuldstændig ignoreret videobeviserne og er vendt tilbage til at anmode om det samme bankdokument, der forsinkede min tidligere klage i flere måneder.
Til sidst blev den tidligere klage afgjort til min fordel uden at jeg overhovedet havde brug for det dokument.
Dette viser, at det anmodede dokument aldrig faktisk var nødvendigt for at løse tvisten.
Et andet problem bekymrer mig dybt.
Hver gang MostBet hævder, at pengene blev overført, skal jeg fremlægge bevis for, at jeg ikke har modtaget dem.
Men når jeg anmoder MostBet om bevis for, at de rent faktisk har indledt en betalingsundersøgelse, nægter de at fremlægge:
enhver reference til betalingsundersøgelse,
enhver RRN,
ethvert ARN,
enhver betalingssporingsreference,
eller endda et officielt klagenummer hos deres betalingsudbyder.
Med andre ord kræver enhver udtalelse fra casinoet bevis fra mig, mens casinoet selv ikke fremlægger noget verificerbart bevis for sine egne påstande.
Som afsendende part bør MostBet kunne påvise, at de har indledt en formel undersøgelse hos deres betalingsudbyder, hvis de oprigtigt mener, at overførslerne blev gennemført.
I stedet placeres bevisbyrden gentagne gange udelukkende hos spilleren, mens afsenderen ikke fremlægger nogen tilsvarende beviser overhovedet.
Denne gentagne adfærd rejser alvorlig bekymring vedrørende gennemsigtigheden og retfærdigheden i deres tvistbilæggelsesproces.
Jeg beder respektfuldt Casino Guru om at overveje dette tilbagevendende mønster nøje.
Jeg anmoder også venligst om, at MostBet inviteres til at deltage i denne klage hurtigst muligt.
Baseret på mine tidligere erfaringer er unødvendige forsinkelser blevet et tilbagevendende mønster, og jeg er oprigtigt bekymret over, at den samme fremgangsmåde gentages igen.
Jeg håber, at Casino Guru kan hjælpe med at forhindre yderligere forsinkelser og sikre, at casinoet endelig fremlægger objektive beviser i stedet for at gentage de samme anmodninger, der allerede har vist sig unødvendige i den foregående sag.
Mange tak for din fortsatte støtte.
Med venlig hilsen,
AZ
Spiller-ID: [skjult af Casino Guru]
Dear Veronika,
I would like to provide another important update regarding my complaint.
Today, I contacted MostBet support again. For the first time, a support representative explained what had happened internally.
He informed me that the previous investigations related to my reopened requests had already been closed by the Financial Department with exactly the same conclusion as before: according to them, the withdrawals had been successfully processed.
However, after I submitted my official PDF account statement, another representative opened a new financial investigation, which is currently under review once again.
What concerns me the most is that this is exactly the same pattern that occurred in my previous complaint concerning 17,345 EGP, which Casino Guru is already aware of.
Despite providing:
Official PDF account statements,
Video recordings clearly proving that the disputed funds never reached my wallet,
All requested documents,
the Financial Department has completely ignored the video evidence once again and returned to requesting the same banking document that delayed my previous complaint for months.
Eventually, that previous complaint was resolved in my favor without requiring that document at all.
This demonstrates that the requested document was never actually necessary to resolve the dispute.
Another issue deeply concerns me.
Every time MostBet claims that the funds were transferred successfully, I am required to provide evidence proving that I did not receive them.
However, when I request evidence from MostBet proving that they actually initiated a payment investigation, they refuse to provide:
any Payment Investigation Reference,
any RRN,
any ARN,
any payment trace reference,
or even an official complaint number with their payment provider.
In other words, every statement made by the casino requires proof from me, while the casino itself provides no verifiable proof for its own claims.
As the sending party, MostBet should be able to demonstrate that it has initiated a formal investigation with its payment provider if it genuinely believes the transfers were completed successfully.
Instead, the burden of proof is repeatedly placed entirely on the player, while the sender provides no equivalent evidence whatsoever.
This repeated behavior raises serious concerns regarding the transparency and fairness of their dispute resolution process.
I respectfully ask Casino Guru to consider this recurring pattern carefully.
I also kindly request that MostBet be invited into this complaint as soon as possible.
Based on my previous experience, unnecessary delays have become a recurring pattern, and I am genuinely concerned that the same approach is being repeated again.
I hope Casino Guru can help prevent further delays and ensure that the casino finally provides objective evidence instead of repeating the same requests that have already proven unnecessary in the previous case.
Thank you very much for your continued support.
Kind regards,
A. Z.
Player ID: [hidden by Casino Guru]
Redigeret af en Casino Guru admin
Automatisk oversættelse: