The player from Hamburg was dissatisfied after the casino was unable to process a withdrawal to the same credit card used for deposits due to technical reasons. Instead, the casino offered a bank transfer, which the player considered unprofessional, particularly as a long-standing customer. The player also expressed frustration over the lack of communication during the following days. During the investigation, it was established that the withdrawal had been declined by the payment service provider due to merchant deposit limits rather than by the casino itself. The funds were promptly returned to the player's account, and an alternative withdrawal method was offered. However, the player chose to continue gambling with the returned balance and subsequently lost it. Although the player remained dissatisfied with the outcome, the Complaints Team concluded that the casino had acted in good faith. The complaint was marked as resolved following the player's confirmation.
Spilleren fra Hamborg var utilfreds, efter at casinoet af tekniske årsager ikke kunne behandle en udbetaling til det samme kreditkort, der blev brugt til indbetalinger. I stedet tilbød casinoet en bankoverførsel, hvilket spilleren anså for uprofessionelt, især som en mangeårig kunde. Spilleren udtrykte også frustration over den manglende kommunikation i de følgende dage. Under undersøgelsen blev det fastslået, at udbetalingen var blevet afvist af betalingstjenesteudbyderen på grund af forhandlernes indbetalingsgrænser snarere end af casinoet selv. Pengene blev straks returneret til spillerens konto, og en alternativ udbetalingsmetode blev tilbudt. Spilleren valgte dog at fortsætte med at spille med den returnerede saldo og tabte den efterfølgende. Selvom spilleren forblev utilfreds med resultatet, konkluderede klageteamet, at casinoet havde handlet i god tro. Klagen blev markeret som løst efter spillerens bekræftelse.