Jeg vandt cirka 21.000 CAD i casinospil (ikke sportsbook) på Rainbet og anmodede om en udbetaling. Supporten bad mig om at udfylde yderligere KYC-verifikation, herunder en kontoudtog (PDF) og en videooptagelse fra min bankapp. Jeg blev oprindeligt bedt om at uploade disse via en offentlig videodelingsside (Streamable), hvilket jeg afslog på grund af privatlivs- og sikkerhedshensyn.
Jeg indsendte den ønskede kontoudtog og video med redigerede personlige oplysninger – jeg dækkede mit kontonummer, irrelevante transaktioner og saldo, mens jeg holdt mit navn, bank og den relevante transaktion fuldt synlige, tilstrækkeligt til at bekræfte identitet og kontoejerskab. Support afviste disse dokumenter med den begrundelse, at redigering var "ikke acceptabelt", og at "alle oplysninger" skulle "vises på selve dokumentet", uden at nævne nogen specifik politik.
Jeg gennemgik Rainbets offentliggjorte vilkår og betingelser og AML-side og fandt intet krav om, at dokumenter skulle indsendes uredigeret. Da supporten blev bedt om at præcisere, gav de tre forskellige, inkonsistente begrundelser i flere meddelelser: først at det var "i overensstemmelse med vores vilkår og betingelser" (ingen klausul citeret), derefter at det var "standardprocedure krævet af banken" (min bank har ingen rolle i en tredjeparts interne verifikationskrav), og derefter at det var påkrævet af Gigadat (deres betalingsbehandler) på grund af en "uoverensstemmelse i nogle af de tidligere leverede oplysninger".
Da jeg bad supporten om at identificere den specifikke transaktion eller det specifikke beløb, der skulle matches, fik jeg ikke et klart svar. Jeg identificerede uafhængigt den sandsynlige matchende transaktion på min bankudtog (en Gigadat Inc. e-overførsel, reference FCDH27, dateret 3 dage efter Rainbets interne transaktionsdato – i overensstemmelse med normal behandlingsforsinkelse) og tilbød at bekræfte dette, men supporten uddybede ikke detaljerne.
Jeg sendte også en e-mail til Rainbets kontaktperson for manageren (som anvist af supporten) for at anmode om afklaring af de samme punkter, men modtog intet svar efter 3-4 hverdage.
Support har siden udtalt: "Du skal give os din kontoudtog, der dækker de sidste 30 dage. Desværre er denne beslutning endelig og kan ikke ændres af vores afdeling," uden at besvare nogen af mine specifikke spørgsmål om transaktionsmatchet eller grundlaget for at kræve uredigerede dokumenter. Rainbets egne servicevilkår (20.1) angiver, at de kan begrænse udbetalinger og adgang til midler, hvis verifikationen ikke er gennemført inden for 72 timer, hvilket jeg forstår sætter min konto i risiko for at blive låst på trods af mit fortsatte samarbejde i god tro.
Jeg er villig til at fremlægge rimelig dokumentation for at bekræfte min identitet og kontoejerskab, og har gjort det gentagne gange, men jeg er ikke tryg ved at oplyse et fuldt uredigeret bankkontonummer og en uredigeret video i betragtning af de skiftende, udokumenterede begrundelser, jeg har modtaget. Jeg anmoder om hjælp til at løse denne hævning.
I won approximately $21,000 CAD in casino games (not sportsbook) on Rainbet and requested a withdrawal. Support asked me to complete additional KYC verification, including a bank statement (PDF) and a video recording of my banking app. I was initially instructed to upload these via a public video-sharing site (Streamable), which I declined due to privacy and security concerns.
I submitted the requested bank statement and video with personal information redacted — I covered my account number, unrelated transactions, and balance, while keeping my name, bank, and the relevant transaction fully visible, sufficient to confirm identity and account ownership. Support rejected these documents, stating redaction was "not acceptable" and that "all information" must be "displayed on the document itself," without citing any specific policy.
I reviewed Rainbet's published Terms & Conditions and AML page and found no requirement for documents to be submitted unredacted. When asked to clarify, support gave three different, inconsistent justifications over several messages: first that it was "in accordance with our terms and conditions" (no clause cited), then that it was "standard procedure required by the bank" (my bank has no role in a third party's internal verification requirements), and then that it was required by Gigadat (their payment processor) due to a "mismatch in some of the information previously provided."
When I asked support to identify the specific transaction or amount that needed to be matched, I was not given a clear answer. I independently identified the likely matching transaction on my bank statement (a Gigadat Inc. e-transfer, reference FCDH27, dated 3 days after Rainbet's internal transaction date — consistent with normal processing delay) and offered to confirm this, but support did not engage with the specifics.
I also emailed Rainbet's manager contact (as directed by support) requesting clarification on the same points and received no response after 3-4 business days.
Support has since stated: "You will need to provide us with your bank statement covering the last 30 days. Unfortunately, this decision is final and cannot be changed by our department," without addressing any of my specific questions about the transaction mismatch or the basis for requiring unredacted documents. Rainbet's own Terms of Service (20.1) state they may restrict withdrawals and access to funds if verification is not completed within 72 hours, which I understand puts my account at risk of being locked despite my continued good-faith cooperation.
I am willing to provide reasonable documentation to confirm my identity and account ownership, and have done so repeatedly, but I am not comfortable providing a fully unredacted bank account number and unredacted video given the shifting, unsubstantiated justifications I've received. I'm requesting help resolving this withdrawal.
Automatisk oversættelse: