Tredje gang er en charme for problemer med risikable terningudbydere - denne gang har jeg uigendrivelige beviser.
Jeg vil starte med at sige, at det er en skam, da kasinoet havde optrådt meget godt i tidligere interaktioner.
Så Razed har introduceret en serie af spil med titlen "Un Originals" - de har en version af terninger, der dybest set er et spil.
Desværre har det nogle helt bizarre problemer, som jeg har rigelige billeder og videoer af.
Nogle grundlæggende fakta
Jeg har satset over 200 mio. USD på terninger, så jeg er godt klar over alle ins og outs.
Min strategi er ret simpel - Hvis min indsats taber, stiger indsatsen med 70%. 39% chance for at vinde. Nogle gange et stop loss.
Ofte når jeg kommer til et stort ish bet, ill hit stop start bet mellem sige.. 2 og 20 gange - hvis du gør det hurtigt, holder det væddemålet det samme. Så sig, at jeg har en saldo på 1000, væddemålet bliver op til 50, jeg stopper måske med at starte 20 gange og håber, at jeg får flere gevinster, og min saldo går tilbage til sige 2k, og jeg vil genoptage normal betting.
Af en eller anden grund, som jeg er helt sikker på, at stavepersonalet stadig ikke kan forklare, hvis du trykkede 10 gange (stop start 5 gange hver effektivt), ville spillet begynde at gøre BIZARRE ting,
Til at starte med var det utrolig hurtigt. Hurtigere end du manuelt kunne stoppe start.
Jeg lavede omfattende test med en lav balance bare for at konstatere, hvad der foregik (efter at have mistet en masse).
De fleste væddemål var simpelthen mit basisvæddemål. Det ville ignorere "på tab gå op 70%".
Nogle gange ville den nulstilles for at basere indsatsen på tab i stedet for at vinde.
Nogle gange ville det fungere for f.eks. 6 tab (stigende 70% hver gang) og så ville det bare nulstilles.
Da det bugnede og ofte nulstillede på både tab og sejr, kunne jeg få en del optagelser og tusindvis af indsatser.
Væddemålene kan ikke forklares.
Men nu, til stykket de pièce de résistance: På et tidspunkt lavede den et væddemål, så kom det store "utilstrækkelige saldo" kan ikke gøre væddemål-ikonet op. MEN DET VAR STADIG AT VEDDE. Da jeg forsøgte at stoppe det, kunne jeg ikke, da jeg var nødt til at klikke for at erkende den manglende balance (som var...væddemål).
Så effektivt satte det en blokering for overhovedet at kunne betjene kontroller.
Jeg har vist raseret dette, One var ligesom .. åh det er ikke lige med det samme - genialt. Andre forvirrede. Hovedpersonen repræsenterede, at det ikke var en big deal.
Hvor det bliver værre er, at selvom de er udstyret med alle mine beviser, der viser dets problemer, tog de ikke spillet ned, og det registrerede en mindre end gennemsnitlig RTP. Jeg forsøgte at foreslå i chat, at folk undgår netop det spil og blev forbudt.
Vedhæftet fil 5 - Det at trykke er, at jeg får det til at udløse fejlen. For at udløse det, var det 8-10 hurtige stopstarter, ENDENDE PÅ EN START. Derefter ville det være sindssygt hurtigt konstant (ingen relevans for hvor mange gange du trykkede)
Vær venlig at slå lyden fra, da den får mig til at bande i det, men denne video er kommet frem i boksen, hvor der står utilstrækkelige midler, men stadig væddemål, hurtigt og nægte adgang til spilværktøjer.
Jeg vil tilføje en etisk bemærkning - efter at dette var sket, og jeg var skuffet over den manglende integritet, som ejerskab og VIP-værter viste, gik jeg for at holde op. Det var en utrolig langsom proces, og da jeg endelig nåede til slutningen, tilbød den mig et tabsback via e-mail, som jeg må vente med at få.
Medarbejderen hjalp mig spurgte mig, om jeg troede, jeg havde et problem med gambling, jeg sagde nej, og at jeg havde et problem med et defekt spil.
Men hun var uenig og gav mig to gamblere hjælpeannoncelinks.
Det er chokerende, at de så ville få mig til at blive ved at tilbyde et forsinket tabsback.
For ordens skyld har jeg det fint, jeg har ikke brug for hjælp, men jeg vil tage tabet tilbage.
Men etisk set er det bare moralsk bankerot.
Tak for din tid!
Third time's a charm for issues with dodgy dice providers - this time I've got irrefutable evidence.
I'll start by saying its a shame as in previous interactions the casino had acted very well.
So, Razed has introduced a series of games titled "Un Originals" - they have a version of dice that is basically a rip of stake's.
Unforunately, it has some absolutely bizarre issues which I have copious photos and videos of.
Some basic facts
I've wagered over 200m USD on dice so am well aware of all the ins and outs.
My strategy is quite simple - If my bet loses, bet goes up 70%. 39% chance of winning. Sometimes a stop loss.
Often when I get to a large ish bet, ill hit stop start bet between say.. 2 and 20 times - if you do it quickly it keeps the bet the same. So say I have a balance of 1000, the bet gets up to 50, i might stop start 20 times and hope that I get more wins, and my balance goes back up to say 2k, and I'll resume normal betting.
For some reason that I'm quite sure Stake staff still can't explain, If you tappped 10 times (stop start 5 times each effectively), the game would start doing BIZARRE things,
To start with it was incredibly fast. Faster than you could manually stop start.
I did extensive testing with a low balance just to ascertain what was going on (after losing a bunch).
Most bets were simply my base bet. It would ignore the "on loss go up 70%".
Sometimes it would reset to base bet on loss, rather than win.
Sometimes it would work for say 6 losses (increasing 70% each time) and then would just reset.
Since it was bugging and often resetting on both loss and win, I could get quite a bit of footage and thousands of bets.
The bets cannot be explained.
But now, for the piece de pièce de résistance: At one stage it made a bet, then the big "insufficient balance" cannot make bet icon came up.BUT IT WAS STILL BETTING. When I tried to stop it, I couldn't, as I had to click to acknowledge the lack of balance (which was...betting).
So effectively it put a block to even be able to operate controls.
I have showed razed this, One was like.. oh thats not right straight away - genius. Others confused. Main person represented that it wasn't a big deal.
Where it gets worse is that whilst equipped with all my evidence showing its issues, they didn't take the game down and it did record a less than average RTP. I tried to suggest in chat that people avoid just that game and was banned.
Attachment 5 - The tapping is me getting it to trigger the bug. To trigger it, it was 8-10 quickish stop starts, ENDING ON A START. After that it would be insanely fast constantly (no relevance to how many times you tapped)
Please mute it as it has me swearing in it, but this video has the box come up saying insufficient funds, yet remains betting, quickly, and denying access to gameplay tools.
I will add on an ethical note - after this had happened and i was disappointed in the lack of integrity shown by ownership and VIP hosts, I went to quit. It was an incredibly slow process, and when I finally got to the end it offered me a lossback via email that I have to wait to get.
The staff member assisted me asked me if I thought I had a problem with gambling, I said no and that I had a problem with a faulty game.
But she disagreed and gave me two gamblers help ad links.
It is shocking that they would then get me to stay by offering a delayed lossback.
For the record, I'm fine, I do not need help but I will take the lossback.
But, ethically thats just morally bankrupt.
Thanks for your time!
Automatisk oversættelse: