Hej Natalia og CasinoGuru-teamet,
Tak igen for din hjælp. Jeg vil gerne give en detaljeret afklaring af den vilkår og betingelser, du henviste til, og forklare, hvorfor den ikke bør gælde i min sag.
📧 E-mail tidslinje og intention
Kl. 19:30 sendte jeg en e-mail med en anmodning om deaktivering af kontoen og adgang til mine kontodata i henhold til artikel 15 i GDPR.
I den samme besked anmodede jeg ikke om øjeblikkelig lukning og nævnte ikke noget om at miste midler.
Senere samme aften, klokken 01:36, sendte jeg en anden e-mail med følgende tekst:
"Lukker efter afmelding selvfølgelig"
(der var en lille tastefejl — "curs" i stedet for "course" — men intentionen er 100% klar og forståelig)
Så inden for 6 timer præciserede jeg eksplicit, at kontoen først skulle lukkes, efter mine udbetalinger var behandlet.
🏦 Udbetalingsstatus
Jeg påbegyndte en udbetaling på €500 umiddelbart efter at have vundet i alt €1.601.
Da casinoet kun tillader én udbetaling ad gangen, var jeg i gang med at hæve det fulde beløb i etaper.
Kort efter disse e-mails blev min konto lukket uden varsel – og med €1.101 stadig ubetalte.
På trods af dette fortsatte casinoet og udbetalte €500 – hvilket beviser:
Min konto var i god stand
Tilbagetrækningen var gyldig
Der var ingen brud på vilkår eller KYC-problemer
📜 Om vilkår og betingelser (3.7 – Afslutning med restbeløb)
Jeg er bekendt med bestemmelsen, der siger:
"Du kan kun lukke din konto, hvis der ikke er nogen resterende saldo eller ventende hævninger. Ellers vil pengene blive annulleret."
Men denne bestemmelse gælder ikke her, fordi:
Jeg anmodede ikke om øjeblikkelig lukning.
Jeg instruerede dem udtrykkeligt i at vente, indtil udbetalingen var gennemført.
Ifølge deres egen klausul burde de slet ikke have lukket min konto, mens en udbetaling var i gang – hvilket var præcis, hvad de gjorde.
Hvis nogen overtrådte klausulen, var det casinoet, ikke mig.
🔐 Resumé
Jeg handlede klart og i god tro og fulgte op inden for få timer.
Casinoet lukkede min konto med en udestående saldo, idet de ignorerede min situation og deres egen politik.
De betalte €500, hvilket beviste at saldoen var gyldig.
Jeg anmoder nu kun om det, der lovligt er mit: de resterende €1.101.
Jeg har allerede videresendt e-mailbeviset til natalia.b@casino.guru som anmodet. Giv mig venligst besked, hvis der er behov for yderligere oplysninger.
Tak igen for din fortsatte støtte i forbindelse med løsningen af denne tvist.
Med venlig hilsen,
Robin S*****
Hello Natalia and CasinoGuru team,
Thank you again for your assistance. I’d like to provide a detailed clarification to address the T&C clause you referenced and explain why it should not apply to my case.
📧 Email Timeline and Intent
At 19:30, I sent an email requesting account deactivation and access to my account data under Article 15 GDPR.
In that same message, I did not request immediate closure and made no mention of forfeiting funds.
Later that evening, at 01:36, I sent a second email stating:
"Close after withdrawal of course"
(there was a small typo — "curs" instead of "course" — but the intent is 100% clear and understandable)
So, within 6 hours, I explicitly clarified that the account should only be closed after my withdrawals was processed.
🏦 Withdrawal Status
I initiated a €500 withdrawal immediately after winning a total of €1,601.
Since the casino only allows one withdrawal at a time, I was in the process of withdrawing the full amount in steps.
Shortly after these emails, my account was closed without warning — and with €1,101 still unpaid.
Despite this, the casino went ahead and paid the €500 withdrawal — which proves:
My account was in good standing
The withdrawal was valid
There were no breaches of terms or KYC issues
📜 On the T&C Clause (3.7 – Closure with Balance)
I am aware of the clause that states:
"You may only close your account if it has no remaining balance or pending withdrawal. Otherwise, funds will be voided."
But this clause does not apply here, because:
I did not request immediate closure.
I explicitly instructed them to wait until the withdrawal was completed.
According to their own clause, they should not have closed my account at all while a withdrawal was pending — which is exactly what they did.
If anyone violated the clause, it was the casino, not me.
🔐 Summary
I acted clearly, in good faith, and provided follow-up within hours.
The casino closed my account with a balance still pending, ignoring my condition and their own policy.
They paid €500, proving the balance was valid.
I am now only requesting what is lawfully mine: the remaining €1,101.
I have already forwarded the email evidence to natalia.b@casino.guru as requested. Please let me know if anything else is needed.
Thank you again for your continued support in resolving this dispute.
Best regards,
Robin S*****
Redigeret af en Casino Guru admin
Automatisk oversættelse: