Emne: Klage over tilbageholdt hævning og anmodning om rejsebevis
Hej,
Jeg vil gerne indsende en klage vedrørende Slotoro.bets håndtering af min udbetaling.
Jeg registrerede min konto, gennemførte den fulde KYC-verifikation, som casinoet anmodede om, og min identitet blev godkendt. Jeg foretog en indbetaling med mine egne midler, modtog en indbetalingsbonus, opfyldte alle omsætningskrav, og min udbetalingsbare saldo var begrænset til bonussens maksimale udbetaling på €1.050.
Efter at have anmodet om min udbetaling, suspenderede casinoet betalingen og anmodede mig om at fremvise bevis for, at jeg fysisk var til stede i Tyskland og Sverige på bestemte datoer.
Jeg forklarede, at jeg ikke kan fremvise sådanne dokumenter, fordi jeg ikke er i besiddelse af dem. Rejser inden for Schengenområdet involverer ikke grænsekontrol, og jeg blev på intet tidspunkt informeret om, at jeg skulle opbevare dokumentation for min placering, mens jeg brugte casinoet. Jeg bad også casinoet om at specificere præcis, hvilke dokumenter de forventede under disse omstændigheder.
Trods mine anmodninger har casinoet ikke identificeret den specifikke klausul i sine vilkår og betingelser, der forpligter en spiller til at bevise fysisk tilstedeværelse i et andet land efter en udbetalingsanmodning. I stedet angiver de gentagne gange, at jeg enten skal fremvise rejsebevis eller acceptere konfiskationen af min saldo.
Casinoet har nu tilbudt mig følgende "løsning":
min konto vil blive genåbnet;
min saldo på €1.050 vil blive fjernet;
350 euro vil forblive på min konto som en "loyalitetsgest".
Jeg anser ikke dette for en fair løsning.
Jeg anmoder respektfuldt om en uafhængig gennemgang af, om casinoet er berettiget til at konfiskere mine gevinster udelukkende fordi jeg ikke kan fremvise dokumenter, der beviser min fysiske tilstedeværelse i Tyskland og Sverige, på trods af at jeg har bestået KYC og overholdt de offentliggjorte bonusbetingelser.
Jeg har gemt al korrespondance med casinoet og kan fremsende skærmbilleder og e-mails efter anmodning.
Tak for din hjælp.
25. juni 2026
Jeg har gennemført omsætningskravene for min indbetalingsbonus i overensstemmelse med casinoets bonusregler.
Mit udbetalingsbeløb var begrænset til det maksimale udbetalingsbeløb på €1.050.
Jeg har indsendt en udbetalingsanmodning på €1.050.
26. juni 2026
I stedet for at behandle min udbetaling, modtog jeg en e-mail fra casinoet, der anmodede mig om at fremvise officielle dokumenter, der beviste, at jeg fysisk var til stede i Tyskland den 25.06.2026 og Sverige den 24.06.2026.
Jeg svarede og forklarede, at jeg ikke var i besiddelse af sådanne dokumenter, fordi rejser inden for Schengenområdet normalt ikke giver officielt bevis for tilstedeværelse, især når man rejser uden hotelbookinger eller kortbetalinger.
Jeg bad casinoet om at præcisere, hvilke specifikke dokumenter de forventede, at jeg skulle fremlægge.
27. juni – 1. juli 2026
Jeg modtog intet svar på min e-mail.
Jeg sendte en opfølgende besked og spurgte, om mit svar var modtaget, og om der var behov for yderligere oplysninger.
Igen modtog jeg intet svar.
2. juli 2026
Da mine e-mails forblev ubesvarede, kontaktede jeg casinoet via livechat.
Under samtalen informerede supportmedarbejderen mig om, at der kun var to mulige forklaringer:
Jeg var fysisk til stede i Tyskland og Sverige; eller
Jeg brugte en VPN.
Jeg spurgte igen, hvilke officielle dokumenter realistisk set kunne bevise rejse inden for Schengenområdet.
Supportmedarbejderen foreslog eksempler såsom hotelreservationer eller kvitteringer, men forklarede ikke, hvordan en spiller, der ikke havde sådanne dokumenter, kunne imødekomme denne anmodning.
Der blev ikke truffet nogen endelig beslutning under samtalen.
Efter 2. juli 2026
Jeg anmodede formelt om:
den nøjagtige vilkår og betingelser-klausul, der understøtter deres anmodning;
afklaring af det kontraktlige grundlag for krav om bevis for fysisk tilstedeværelse;
oplysninger om den officielle procedure for tvistbilæggelse.
Casinoets endelige svar
Casinoet svarede, at deres administration havde gennemgået min sag.
De oplyste, at der var blevet registreret kontologin fra Tyskland og Sverige.
De identificerede dog ikke den præcise vilkår og betingelser-klausul, der kræver, at spillere fremviser bevis for fysisk tilstedeværelse i disse lande.
I stedet tilbød de to muligheder:
Fremvise bevis for, at jeg fysisk var til stede i Tyskland og Sverige på de ønskede datoer; eller
Accepter at min saldo på €1.050 ville blive konfiskeret, mens €350 ville forblive på min konto som en "loyalitetsgest".
Subject: Complaint regarding withheld withdrawal and request for travel proof
Hello,
I would like to submit a complaint regarding the handling of my withdrawal by Slotoro.bet.
I registered my account, completed the full KYC verification requested by the casino, and my identity was successfully approved. I made a deposit using my own funds, received a deposit bonus, fulfilled all wagering requirements, and my withdrawable balance was limited to the bonus maximum cashout of €1,050.
After requesting my withdrawal, the casino suspended the payment and requested that I provide proof that I was physically present in Germany and Sweden on certain dates.
I explained that I cannot provide such documents because I do not possess them. Travel within the Schengen Area does not involve border controls, and I was not informed at any point that I would need to retain evidence of my location while using the casino. I also asked the casino to specify what exact documents they expected in these circumstances.
Despite my requests, the casino has not identified the specific clause in its Terms and Conditions that obliges a player to prove physical presence in another country after a withdrawal request has been made. Instead, they repeatedly state that either I must provide travel proof or accept the confiscation of my balance.
The casino has now offered me the following "resolution":
my account will be reopened;
my €1,050 balance will be removed;
€350 will remain on my account as a "gesture of loyalty."
I do not consider this a fair resolution.
I respectfully request an independent review of whether the casino is entitled to confiscate my winnings solely because I cannot provide documents proving my physical presence in Germany and Sweden, despite having passed KYC and complied with the published bonus conditions.
I have kept all correspondence with the casino and can provide screenshots and emails upon request.
Thank you for your assistance.
25 June 2026
I completed the wagering requirements for my deposit bonus in accordance with the casino's bonus rules.
My withdrawable amount was limited to the maximum cashout of €1,050.
I submitted a withdrawal request for €1,050.
26 June 2026
Instead of processing my withdrawal, I received an email from the casino requesting that I provide official documents proving that I was physically present in Germany on 25.06.2026 and Sweden on 24.06.2026.
I replied explaining that I did not possess any such documents because travel within the Schengen Area does not normally generate official proof of presence, especially when travelling without hotel bookings or card payments.
I asked the casino to clarify what specific documents they expected me to provide.
27 June – 1 July 2026
I received no response to my email.
I sent a follow-up message asking whether my reply had been received and whether any additional information was required.
Again, I received no response.
2 July 2026
Since my emails remained unanswered, I contacted the casino via Live Chat.
During the conversation, the support agent informed me that there were only two possible explanations:
I was physically present in Germany and Sweden; or
I was using a VPN.
I again asked what official documents could realistically prove travel within the Schengen Area.
The support agent suggested examples such as hotel reservations or receipts but did not explain how a player who had no such documents could satisfy this request.
No final decision was made during the chat.
After 2 July 2026
I formally requested:
the exact Terms & Conditions clause supporting their request;
clarification of the contractual basis for requiring proof of physical presence;
information about the official dispute resolution procedure.
Casino's final response
The casino replied that their administration had reviewed my case.
They stated that account logins had been detected from Germany and Sweden.
However, they did not identify the exact Terms & Conditions clause that requires players to provide proof of physical presence in those countries.
Instead, they offered two options:
Provide proof that I was physically present in Germany and Sweden on the requested dates; or
Accept that my €1,050 balance would be confiscated, while €350 would remain on my account as a "gesture of loyalty."
Automatisk oversættelse: