Klage vedrørende annullerede gevinster på ca. £8.000.
Jeg indsender en klage vedrørende annulleringen af mine gevinster og annulleringen af udbetalinger efter en spillesession på dette casino.
Jeg indbetalte £50 og modtog en kampagnebonus på £75, hvilket gav en samlet startsaldo på £125. Efter at have opfyldt omsætningskravene gennem normalt spilleautomatspil, nåede min saldo til sidst op på cirka £8.000.
Jeg indsendte to udbetalingsanmodninger (£5.000 og £3.000) som skærmbilleder vedhæftet fra en automatisk e-mail genereret oprindeligt fra dem. Begge udbetalinger blev senere annulleret, og mine gevinster blev fjernet fra min konto. Jeg fik refunderet den oprindelige indsats på £50, og de resterende gevinster blev uretmæssigt annulleret.
Jeg modtog ingen e-mail-notifikation, der forklarede beslutningen, da udbetalingerne blev annulleret og gevinsterne fjernet. Den eneste forklaring, der blev givet, kom senere via livechatfunktionen, da jeg kontaktede supporten for at spørge, hvad der var sket (vedhæftet).
Casinoet oplyste, at mine gevinster var blevet annulleret på grund af en påstået overtrædelse af reglen om maksimal indsats, mens en bonus var aktiv. De hævder, at en resterende bonussaldo på £2,25 begrænsede min maksimale indsats til cirka £0,67, og at flere indsatser mellem £3 og £9 overtrådte reglerne.
Jeg bestrider denne beslutning af flere årsager:
For det første er jeg VIP-spiller, og casinoets egne vilkår angiver, at VIP-spillere har tilladelse til at placere højere indsatser i forhold til den krediterede bonus.
For det andet refererer den nævnte regel til den "samlede værdi af den aktive bonus, der er krediteret", ikke den fluktuerende resterende bonussaldo. Casinoet ser ud til at fortolke denne regel ved at bruge den resterende saldo snarere end det krediterede bonusbeløb.
For det tredje blev saldoen under spillet kun vist som "Kredit". Der var ingen synlig forskel mellem kontant- og bonussaldo, og derfor ingen klar indikation af, at en meget lille resterende bonussaldo stadig var aktiv, eller at en så restriktiv maksimal indsats var gældende.
For det fjerde bestod mit gameplay af normalt spilleautomatspil på tværs af flere spil med standardindsatsstørrelser. Flere af de største gevinster fra sessionen inkluderede:
£10 indsats – Gates of Olympus 1000 – £2.014 gevinst (dette skete efter at omsætningskravene allerede var opfyldt)
£6-indsats – Tut's Legacy – gevinst på £2.135,40
£5-indsats – Her Genie Ways – £625-gevinst
£4-indsats – Big Bass Splash – gevinst på £3.747,60
£4-indsats – Sugar Rush 1000 – gevinst på £1.508,80
£5 indsats – en anden spilleautomat (spillets navn vises ikke i historikken) – £1.015 gevinst
Det er vigtigt at bemærke, at gevinsten på £2.014 fra et væddemål på £10 opstod efter, at omsætningskravene allerede var opfyldt, hvilket betyder, at bonussen burde være blevet konverteret til rigtige penge, og bonusbegrænsninger burde ikke længere have været gældende.
Derudover var tidligere udbetalinger fra min konto allerede blevet gennemgået og godkendt af casinoet under lignende spilforhold:
£3.007 – hævning foretaget 05/01/2026 – betalt 09/01/2026
£3.901 – hævning foretaget 17/01/2026 – betalt 28/01/2026
£5.000 – hævning foretaget 28/01/2026 – betalt 04/03/2026
Disse udbetalinger beløber sig til i alt £11.908 og viser, at lignende spil tidligere er blevet accepteret og godkendt af casinoet.
Den endelige tilbagetrækning, der er nævnt ovenfor, tog også cirka fem uger at behandle på trods af hyppige anmodninger om opdateringer.
Efter min mening, selv hvis man antager, at der er tale om et teknisk brud, ville det være en uforholdsmæssig stor straf at konfiskere cirka £8.000 på grund af en resterende bonussaldo på £2,25. Baseret på reglerne i deres vilkår, kunne jeg som VIP-medlem maksimalt indsætte 30% af den oprindelige bonus, maksimalt £15 pr. indsats. I dette tilfælde var den krediterede bonus £75, så 30% er £22,50. Den højeste indsats, jeg spillede, var £10, så det var inden for de vilkår, de angiver på siden.
Jeg forsøgte at løse dette direkte med casinoet ved at sende en formel klage-e-mail (09/03) og en opfølgende besked (13/03), men har ikke modtaget noget svar. Disse blev sendt til begge:
Support@spinmillionmail.com
Vipmanager@spinmillionmail.com
Se vedhæftede skærmbilleder:
- De 2 e-mailbekræftelser af de oprindeligt anmodede udbetalinger
- Udbetalingshistorik fra hjemmesiden (viser 'annulleret')
- Beskrivelse taget fra chatfunktionen på hjemmesiden og WhatsApp
- 'Justering' af gevinster på £7.950
Jeg har også skærmbilleder, der bekræfter VIP-status, bevis på de individuelle større gevinster, der er anført ovenfor, og bonusvilkårene angivet på hjemmesiden, som modsiger fortolkningen af den krediterede bonus. Det maksimale antal acreenshots er overskredet nedenfor, men udleverer dem gerne på anmodning.
Jeg anmoder derfor om hjælp til at gennemgå denne sag og beder casinoet om at foretage en fuldstændig revision af de påståede brud, herunder de nøjagtige indsatser, tidsstempler og bonussaldo på det tidspunkt.
Complaint regarding voided winnings of approximately £8,000.
I am submitting a complaint regarding the voiding of my winnings and cancellation of withdrawals following a gaming session on this casino.
I deposited £50 and received a £75 promotional bonus credit, giving a total starting balance of £125. After completing the wagering requirements through normal slot gameplay, my balance eventually reached approximately £8,000.
I submitted two withdrawal requests (£5,000 and £3,000 screenshots attached from automatic email generated initially from them). Both withdrawals were later cancelled and my winnings were removed from my account. I was refunded the initial £50 stake and the remaining winnings were wrongfully voided.
I did not receive any email notification explaining the decision at the time the withdrawals were cancelled and the winnings were removed. The only explanation provided was later given through the live chat function when I contacted support to ask what had happened (attached).
The casino stated that my winnings had been voided due to an alleged breach of the maximum bet rule while a bonus was active. They claim that a remaining bonus balance of £2.25 restricted my maximum bet to approximately £0.67, and that several bets between £3 and £9 breached the rules.
I dispute this decision for several reasons:
Firstly, I am a VIP player and the casino’s own terms state that VIP players are permitted to place higher bets relative to the bonus credited.
Secondly, the rule referenced refers to the "total value of the active bonus credited", not the fluctuating remaining bonus balance. The casino appears to be interpreting this rule using the remaining balance rather than the credited bonus amount.
Thirdly, during gameplay the balance was displayed only as "Credit". There was no visible distinction between cash and bonus balances, and therefore no clear indication that a very small remaining bonus balance was still active or that such a restrictive maximum bet applied.
Fourthly, my gameplay consisted of normal slot play across multiple games with standard stake sizes. Several of the largest wins from the session included:
£10 bet – Gates of Olympus 1000 – £2,014 win (this occurred after the wagering requirements had already been completed)
£6 bet – Tut’s Legacy – £2,135.40 win
£5 bet – Her Genie Ways – £625 win
£4 bet – Big Bass Splash – £3,747.60 win
£4 bet – Sugar Rush 1000 – £1,508.80 win
£5 bet – another slot (game name not shown in history) – £1,015 win
Importantly, the £2,014 win from a £10 bet occurred after the wagering requirements had already been completed, meaning the bonus should have been converted to real funds and bonus restrictions should no longer have applied.
Additionally, earlier withdrawals from my account had already been reviewed and approved by the casino under similar gameplay conditions:
£3,007 – withdrawal placed 05/01/2026 – paid 09/01/2026
£3,901 – withdrawal placed 17/01/2026 – paid 28/01/2026
£5,000 – withdrawal placed 28/01/2026 – paid 04/03/2026
These withdrawals total £11,908 and demonstrate that similar gameplay was previously accepted and approved by the casino.
The final withdrawal listed above also took approximately five weeks to process despite frequent requests for updates.
In my view, even if a technical breach were assumed, confiscating approximately £8,000 due to a £2.25 remaining bonus balance represents a disproportionate penalty. Based on the rules stated in their terms, as a VIP member I could submit a maximum single stake of 30% of the initial bonus credited, maxed out at £15 per single stake. In this instance, the bonus credited was £75, so 30% is £22.50. The highest stake I played was £10, so well within the terms they state on the site.
I attempted to resolve this directly with the casino by sending a formal complaint email (09/03) and a follow-up message (13/03) but have received no response. These were sent to both:
Support@spinmillionmail.com
Vipmanager@spinmillionmail.com
See attached screenshots:
- The 2 email confirmations of the initial requested withdrawals
- Withdrawal history from the website (showing 'cancelled')
- Description taken from the chat function on the website and WhatsApp
- 'Adjustment'of £7,950 winnings
I also have screenshots confirming VIP status, proof of the individual larger wins listed above and the bonus terms stated on the website which contradict the interpretation of bonus credited. The max amount of acreenshots is exceeded below, but happy to provide on request.
I am therefore requesting assistance in reviewing this case and asking the casino to provide a full audit of the alleged breaches, including the exact bets, timestamps, and bonus balance at the time.
Automatisk oversættelse: