Hej Veronika,
Jeg vil gerne give en vigtig opdatering vedrørende min sag og det seneste svar fra Stake.
Stake har nu præciseret, at min konto fortsat er begrænset på grund af utilstrækkelig verifikation for begge:
Niveau 3 (Bevis for adresse)
Niveau 4 (Finansieringskilde)
For niveau 3,
De oplyste, at dokumenter i min fars navn og den notarbekræftede erklæring ikke er tilstrækkelige, da de kræver et uafhængigt verificerbart dokument udstedt i mit eget navn. Som svar på dette har jeg informeret dem om, at jeg vil indhente et bankreferencebrev fra min bank i mit eget navn (inklusive min fulde adresse) og vil indsende det, så snart det er udstedt.
For niveau 4 (finansieringskilde),
Stake nævnte, at de dokumenter, der indtil videre er fremlagt (primært min fars kontoudtog), ikke fastslår en klar forbindelse mellem mig og de midler, der er brugt på kontoen.
For at imødegå dette har jeg nu givet dem en detaljeret forklaring, der forklarer den faktiske oprindelse og strøm af mine midler.
Helt konkret forklarede jeg at:
Midlerne stammer fra mine personlige onlineaktiviteter, primært fra handel på Polymarket , hvor jeg deltog i forudsigelsesmarkeder og genererede profit gennem købs-/salgspositioner.
Jeg havde også yderligere indtægter fra online platforme som Roblox (digitale/spilrelaterede aktiviteter)
Alle midler blev overført via min personlige ikke-depotbaserede tegnebog på Polygon-netværket.
Der blev ikke modtaget eller blandet tredjepartsmidler
Eventuelle gentagne ind- og udbetalinger skyldtes normal platformbrug, hvor tidligere hævede midler blev genbrugt
Jeg har også informeret Stake om, at jeg fuldt ud er i stand til at levere:
Min tegnebogsadresse
Fuld transaktionshistorik (via Polygonscan)
Transaktionshashes
Skærmbilleder af min Polymarket-aktivitet
Trods min fulde samarbejde og detaljerede forklaring, synes problemet at forblive, at deres system eller proces ikke korrekt tager højde for kombineret eller alternativt bevismateriale, og muligvis stadig er stærkt afhængig af strenge dokumentformater.
På nuværende tidspunkt vil jeg venligst anmode om din hjælp med følgende:
For at sikre, at min sag gennemgås manuelt af Stakes compliance-team, idet der tages hensyn til begge:
Min virkelige situation som studerende, der bor hos sine forældre
Det alternative, men legitime bevis, jeg har fremlagt
At rådgive om, hvorvidt min forklaring og blockchain-baserede bevis for midler (Polymarket + wallet-historik) med rimelighed bør anses for acceptabel i henhold til standard verifikationspraksis.
Jeg vil gerne understrege, at:
Jeg har handlet i fuld god tro
Alle midler er legitime, personligt ejede og fuldt sporbare
Jeg er fuldt ud villig til at fremlægge enhver yderligere nødvendig dokumentation
Jeg sætter stor pris på din tid og støtte i forbindelse med gennemgangen af min sag og med at hjælpe med at mægle i denne situation.
Med venlig hilsen,
Abhinav C***
Hello Veronika,
I would like to provide an important update regarding my case and the latest response from Stake.
Stake has now clarified that my account remains restricted due to insufficient verification for both:
Level 3 (Proof of Address)
Level 4 (Source of Funds)
For Level 3,
they stated that documents in my father’s name and the notarized affidavit are not sufficient, as they require an independently verifiable document issued in my own name. In response to this, I have informed them that I will be obtaining a Bank Reference Letter from my bank in my own name (including my full address) and will submit it as soon as it is issued.
For Level 4 (Source of Funds),
Stake mentioned that the documents provided so far (primarily my father’s bank statements) do not establish a clear link between me and the funds used on the account.
To address this, I have now provided them with a detailed clarification explaining the actual origin and flow of my funds.
Specifically, I explained that:
The funds originate from my personal online activities, primarily from trading on Polymarket, where I participated in prediction markets and generated profits through buy/sell positions
I also had additional earnings from online platforms such as Roblox (digital/game-related activities)
All funds were transferred through my personal non-custodial wallet on the Polygon network
No third-party funds were received or mixed
Any repeated deposits and withdrawals were due to normal platform usage, where previously withdrawn funds were reused
I also informed Stake that I am fully able to provide:
My wallet address
Full transaction history (via Polygonscan)
Transaction hashes
Screenshots of my Polymarket activity
Despite my full cooperation and detailed explanation, the issue seems to remain that their system or process is not properly considering combined or alternative proof, and may still be relying heavily on strict document formats.
At this stage, I would kindly request your assistance in the following:
To help ensure that my case is reviewed manually by Stake’s compliance team, considering both:
My real-life situation as a student living with parents
The alternative but legitimate proof I have provided
To advise whether my explanation and blockchain-based proof of funds (Polymarket + wallet history) should reasonably be considered acceptable under standard verification practices
I would like to emphasize that:
I have acted in full good faith
All funds are legitimate, personally owned, and fully traceable
I am fully willing to provide any additional proof required
I truly appreciate your time and support in reviewing my case and helping mediate this situation.
Kind regards,
Abhinav C***
Redigeret af en Casino Guru admin
Automatisk oversættelse: