Jeg benægter ikke, at der ikke var problemer med VOID, men det blev udnyttet, ikke robust eller havde nogen ondsindet hensigt bag sig, det havde sin egen deflationsmekanisme, men der var en genindtræden udnyttelse med den del af den smarte kontrakt, og en udenlandsk udnytter lavede likviditetspuljen brændte, vi meddelte alle, at de straks skulle sælge, før puljen brændes, og det gjorde de fleste, de penge, vi modtog, var også forårsaget af salg af vores egne tokens og investeringer til den pulje, som stadig er aktiv i dag, men brændt til sprød med efterfølgende 1% tilbagetrækning og forbrændinger spammet af udnytteren hundredvis af gange på kort tid. På grund af at vi meddelte, at der er en udnyttelse i gang, og at alle skulle sælge (hvilket de fleste mennesker gjorde), efter at støvet var lagt sig, kunne vi ikke også refundere de mennesker, der ikke kunne sælge fuldt ud, fordi vi ikke var hele, og folk antog markedet cap = de samlede penge indeni, men det er faktisk købssidens likviditet, der betyder noget som likvide penge, så de følte sig snydt, da nogle blev delvist refunderet og nogle slet ikke blev refunderet.

Udnyttelsen skete på grund af de faktiske funktioner, der gik igennem, før tilstandsvariablen blev opdateret (nextVoidTime), så de kunne kalde brændefunktionerne flere gange, før de nogensinde opdaterede kravet om at kalde det, som er nextVoidTime-variablen, denne udnyttelse var en meget uheldig begivenhed men ingen, inklusive dig, kan ikke kalde det en ondsindet, skadelig eller svigagtig, fordi det også var en non-profit udnyttelse, tokens blev bogstaveligt talt brændt og sendt til 0x0000 tegnebog. Så giv mig ikke en lektion om analyse af blockchain, få dine fakta rigtige og gør dine undersøgelser mere grundigt. De penge, jeg sendte til Stake, er helt mine egne penge tjent af mine egne investeringer og har intet at gøre med VOID, at vi sælger vores egne token-investeringer er en helt lovlig og naturlig måde at opnå ETH på, da vi bemærkede, at der var en udnyttelse i gang, vi trak ikke likviditetspuljen (vi kan ikke være under låsekontrakten for evigheden) vi fortalte også alle, at de øjeblikkeligt skulle sælge, hvilket de fleste mennesker gjorde, folk der ikke kunne nogle fik delvist refunderet, men evt. yderligere refusion krævede, at vi udnyttede vores egne midler, og det ville vi åbenbart ikke gøre, fordi vi ikke selv lavede udnyttelsen, det var en udenlandsk enhed, der implementerede mere end 10 lukkede kilde-smarte kontrakter og testede, før de blev i stand til virkelig at brænde hele poolen, og det tidsvindue var, hvor vi indså faren og advarede alle og solgte vores egne investeringer, sikker på, at mange mennesker blev vrede på grund af dette, de havde store forhåbninger, og de blev investeret kraftigt i Void token, og det var også på et stort rally, og det var tydeligvis ikke alle, der kunne sælge i tide eller få det refunderet, det var faktisk ved at blive hvidlistet på Aerodrome 2 dage efter udnyttelsen, og dette var ikke engang offentligt kendt endnu , vi er de største ofre i denne sag, så jeg vil gerne se dig komme med et bedre bevis og en kilde end en tilfældig Twitter-krypto KOL, der forsøger at redde hans ry efter skilling Ugyldig for meget og derefter kaldt os "ruggers" for at aflede skylden væk fra ham selv
I'm not denying there wasn't issues with VOID but it got exploited not rugged or had any malicious intent behind it, it had its own deflationary mechanism but there was a reentrancy exploit with that part of the smart contract and a foreign exploiter made the liquidity pool burn, we announced to everyone that they should immediately sell before the pool is burned and most people did, the money we received was also caused by the sells of our own tokens and investments to that pool which is still active today but burned to a crisp with subsequent 1% withdrawal and burns spammed by the exploiter hundreds of times in a short span of time. Due to us announcing that there is an exploit going on and that everyone should sell (which most people did) after the dust was settled we couldn't also refund the people who couldn't sell fully because we were not whole and people assumed market cap = the total money inside but it's actually the buy side liquidity what matters as liquid money so they felt cheated as some were partially refunded and some were not refunded at all.

The exploit happened due to the actual functions going through before the state variable was updated (nextVoidTime) so they could call the burn functions multiple times before ever updating the requirement to call it, which is the nextVoidTime variable, this exploit was a very unfortunate event but no one including you cannot call it a malicious, harmful or fraudulent because it was also a non-profit exploit the tokens were literally burned and sent to the 0x0000 wallet. So don't give me a lesson on analysis of the blockchain, get your facts right and do your studies more thoroughly. The money i sent to Stake is completely my own money earned by my own investments and has nothing to do with VOID, us selling our own token investments is a perfectly legal and natural way to obtain ETH when we noticed there was an exploit going on, we didn't pull the liquidity pool (we can't its under the lock contract for eternity) we also told everyone that they should instantly sell which most people did, people who couldn't some got partially refunded but any further reimbursement required us to tap into our own funds and we obviously weren't going to do that because we didn't do the exploit ourselves it was a foreign entity that deployed more than 10 closed source smart contracts and did test-runs before being able to truly burn the whole pool and that window of time was where we realized the danger and warned everyone and sold our own investments, sure a lot of people got angry due to this, they had great hopes and they were invested heavily into Void token and it was on a big rally up too and obviously not everyone could sell in time or get reimbursed, it was actually about to get whitelisted in Aerodrome 2 days after the exploit and this wasn't even public knowledge yet, we are the biggest victims in this case so i'd like to see you come up with a better proof and a source than a random Twitter crypto KOL trying to salvage his reputation after shilling VOID too much and then calling us "ruggers" to divert the blame away from himself