Jeg indsender denne klage vedrørende Trueluck Casinos beslutning om at konfiskere hele min saldo på €4.137,82 baseret på påstande om svigagtig eller forbudt aktivitet.
Trueluck informerede mig om, at mine penge var blevet konfiskeret på grund af påståede overtrædelser af afsnit 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2 og 9.3 i deres vilkår og betingelser.
Problemet er, at disse bestemmelser dækker en meget bred vifte af helt forskellige aktiviteter, herunder bedrageri, hemmeligt samarbejde, snyd, softwareassisteret spil, chipdumping, kontodeling, tredjepartsvæddemål, brug af VPN/proxy og anden angiveligt upassende adfærd.
Jeg spurgte Trueluck flere gange om at præcisere, hvad jeg egentlig havde gjort.
Jeg forklarede specifikt, at blot at citere vilkårene og betingelserne ikke fortæller mig, hvilken adfærd der angiveligt blev opdaget. Jeg bad dem om at identificere den specifikke aktivitet, typen af overtrædelse, det relevante spil/den relevante session, og om anklagen omhandlede hemmeligt samarbejde, svigagtig aktivitet, VPN/proxy-brug, tredjepartsaktivitet, softwareassisteret spil eller noget andet.
Trods disse anmodninger har Trueluck gentagne gange nægtet at give nogen specifik forklaring.
I stedet har deres supportteam nu i bund og grund sendt mig det samme svar tre gange, hvor de gentagne gange citerer afsnit 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2 og 9.3 og angiver, at deres ansvarlige team "opdagede overtrædelser".
Selv efter jeg udtrykkeligt bad dem om ikke blot at citere de samme vilkår og betingelser igen, gjorde de præcis det.
Jeg benægter på det kraftigste enhver form for sammensværgelse, snyd, chipdumping, kontodeling, tredjepartsspil, svigagtig aktivitet eller enhver anden manipulation af spillet.
Jeg forstår, at et casino muligvis ikke kan videregive alle detaljer i sine interne svindelsystemer direkte til en spiller. Jeg mener dog ikke, at et casino bør kunne konfiskere en spillers samlede saldo på €4.137,82 blot ved at citere adskillige brede vilkår og betingelser uden overhovedet at identificere, hvad spilleren angiveligt har gjort.
Hvis Trueluck har ægte beviser, der understøtter en så alvorlig anklage, vil jeg gerne have, at de fremlægger de relevante beviser og en detaljeret forklaring for Casino Guru til uafhængig gennemgang. Jeg forstår, at følsomme beviser, hvor det er relevant, kan gives privat til Casino Guru i stedet for at blive offentliggjort for mig.
Jeg er fuldt ud villig til at samarbejde med Casino Guru og give Trueluck min kommunikation eller andre oplysninger, der er nødvendige for undersøgelsen.
Jeg beder derfor respektfuldt Casino Guru om at undersøge denne sag og anmode Trueluck om at underbygge sine påstande.
Hvis Trueluck ikke kan fremlægge tilstrækkelige beviser for, at jeg har begået en alvorlig overtrædelse, der berettiger til konfiskation, mener jeg, at min saldo på €4.137,82 bør genoprettes og gøres tilgængelig for hævning.
Tak for din hjælp.
I am submitting this complaint regarding Trueluck Casino's decision to confiscate my entire balance of €4,137.82 based on allegations of fraudulent or prohibited activity.
Trueluck informed me that my funds had been confiscated due to alleged violations of Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 of their Terms and Conditions.
The problem is that these provisions cover a very broad range of completely different activities, including fraud, collusion, cheating, software-assisted play, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party betting, VPN/proxy usage, and other allegedly improper conduct.
I asked Trueluck several times to clarify what I had actually done.
I specifically explained that simply quoting the Terms and Conditions does not tell me what conduct was supposedly detected. I asked them to identify the specific activity involved, the type of violation, the relevant gameplay/session, and whether the accusation concerned collusion, fraudulent activity, VPN/proxy usage, third-party activity, software-assisted play, or something else.
Despite these requests, Trueluck has repeatedly refused to provide any specific explanation.
Instead, their support team has now essentially sent me the same response three times, repeatedly quoting Sections 2.4.9, 7.5, 9.2, and 9.3 and stating that their responsible team "detected violations."
Even after I explicitly asked them not to simply quote the same Terms and Conditions again, they did exactly that.
I strongly deny engaging in collusion, cheating, chip dumping, account sharing, third-party play, fraudulent activity, or any other manipulation of gameplay.
I understand that a casino may not be able to disclose every detail of its internal fraud-detection systems directly to a player. However, I do not believe that a casino should be able to confiscate a player's entire €4,137.82 balance merely by citing several broad Terms and Conditions without even identifying what the player allegedly did.
If Trueluck has genuine evidence supporting such a serious accusation, I would like them to provide the relevant evidence and a detailed explanation to Casino Guru for independent review. I understand that sensitive evidence may, where appropriate, be provided privately to Casino Guru rather than publicly disclosed to me.
I am fully willing to cooperate with Casino Guru and provide my communication with Trueluck or any other information necessary for the investigation.
I therefore respectfully ask Casino Guru to investigate this case and request that Trueluck substantiate its allegations.
If Trueluck cannot provide sufficient evidence demonstrating that I committed a serious violation warranting confiscation, I believe my €4,137.82 balance should be restored and made available for withdrawal.
Thank you for your assistance.
Automatisk oversættelse: