Jeg indgiver en formel klage mod Trustdice Casino vedrørende den urimelige lukning af min konto, afvisningen af min udbetalingsanmodning og den efterfølgende blokering af min loginadgang baseret på påstået multikontering.
Omstridt beløb og kontostatus:
Afventende udbetaling: 2.300 USDT
Resterende saldo: Ca. 190 USDT
Samlet omstridt beløb: Ca. 2.490 USDT
Aktuel status: Hjemmesiden er tilgængelig, men mit login er fuldstændig blokeret.
Tidslinje for begivenheder (alle tider i UTC+7):
13. maj 2026, 07:44: Jeg har indsendt en udbetalingsanmodning på 2.300 USDT. Disse midler (ca. 2.500 USDT i alt) blev faktisk krediteret min konto af casinoet som en udbetaling/kompensation for en tidligere systemfejl vedrørende ubetalte beløb. Før jeg påbegyndte denne udbetaling, kontaktede jeg eksplicit support for at spørge, om det var tilladt at hæve dette specifikke beløb. Support bekræftede eksplicit, at det var helt i orden at fortsætte. Jeg har et skærmbillede af denne samtale.
(Denne samtale er blevet oversat til koreansk, så det vedhæftede skærmbillede skal oversættes.)
13. maj 2026, 16:18: Jeg modtog en e-mail om blokering af konto, der påstod multikonti. Dette blev gjort pludseligt uden forudgående KYC-bekræftelsesanmodning.
13. maj 2026, 20:32: Jeg sendte en e-mail med forklaring og protest til casinoet for at præcisere situationen, men jeg har ikke modtaget noget svar endnu.
Forklaring af gameplay og IP-overlap:
Fair Play: Min primære aktivitet involverede at spille Pachinko/Pachislot-spil. Jeg har aldrig brugt nogen form for svigagtige metoder eller forbudte programmer. Jeg er fuldt ud forberedt på at fremlægge alle nødvendige beviser for at verificere legitimiteten af mit spil.
Årsag til IP-overlap: Casinoet markerede min konto på grund af en IP-overlapning med tre andre spillere. Dette er et legitimt sammentræf. Disse tre spillere er mine faktiske kolleger fra samme firma. Vi hænger lejlighedsvis ud i det samme rum og spiller spil individuelt på vores egne enheder. Derudover bor to af disse kolleger i forskellige rum i den samme lejlighedsbygning (officetel), hvilket øger sandsynligheden for at dele det samme dynamiske IP-netværk betydeligt.
Villighed til verifikation: Alle tre personer er forskellige, virkelige mennesker, der er fuldt ud villige til at gennemgå fuld KYC-verifikation for at bevise deres separate identiteter. Det er også vigtigt at bemærke, at min konto i øjeblikket har et samlet nettotab, selvom denne ventende udbetaling er fuldt behandlet.
I betragtning af at jeg fik udtrykkelig tilladelse fra supporten, før jeg udbetalte, og at IP-overlapningen er fuldt berettiget, mener jeg, at denne blokering er dybt urimelig. Jeg anmoder venligst Casino Gurus mægling for at muliggøre de nødvendige identitetsbekræftelser og hjælpe med at løse denne tvist, så min konto kan gendannes, og mine midler kan frigives.
Tak for din hjælp.
I am submitting a formal complaint against Trustdice Casino regarding the unfair closure of my account, denial of my withdrawal request, and the subsequent blocking of my login access based on alleged multi-accounting.
Disputed Amount and Account Status:
Pending Withdrawal: 2,300 USDT
Remaining Balance: Approx. 190 USDT
Total Disputed Amount: Approx. 2,490 USDT
Current Status: The website is accessible, but my login is completely blocked.
Timeline of Events (All times in UTC+7):
May 13, 2026, 07:44 AM: I submitted a withdrawal request for 2,300 USDT. This funds (approx. 2,500 USDT in total) was actually credited to my account by the casino as a payout/compensation for a previous system error regarding unpaid amounts. Before initiating this withdrawal, I explicitly contacted support to ask if it was permissible to withdraw this specific amount. Support explicitly confirmed that it was perfectly fine to proceed. I hold screenshot evidence of this conversation.
(This conversation has been translated into Korean, so the attached screenshot requires translation.)
May 13, 2026, 04:18 PM: I received an account blockage email alleging multi-accounting. This was done abruptly without any prior KYC verification request.
May 13, 2026, 08:32 PM: I sent an explanation and protest email to the casino clarifying the situation, but I have received no response to date.
Gameplay & IP Overlap Explanation:
Fair Play: My main activity involved playing Pachinko/Pachislot games. I have never utilized any fraudulent methods or prohibited programs. I am fully prepared to provide any necessary proof to verify the legitimacy of my gameplay.
Reason for IP Overlap: The casino flagged my account due to an IP overlap with three other players. This is a legitimate coincidence. These three players are my actual colleagues from the same company. We occasionally hang out in the same room and play games individually on our own devices. Furthermore, two of these colleagues reside in different rooms within the same apartment building (officetel), which heavily increases the likelihood of sharing the same dynamic IP network.
Willingness for Verification: All three individuals are distinct, real people who are entirely willing to undergo full KYC verification to prove their separate identities. It is also important to note that my account is currently at a net loss overall, even if this pending withdrawal is fully processed.
Given that I obtained explicit permission from support before withdrawing and that the IP overlap is fully justifiable, I believe this block is deeply unfair. I kindly request Casino Guru’s mediation to facilitate the necessary identity verifications and help resolve this dispute so that my account can be restored and my funds released.
Thank you for your assistance.
Automatisk oversættelse: