Jeg mistede adgangen til min gamle konto for noget tid siden og kontaktede compliance-teamet for at få hjælp. De svarede og rådede mig til at åbne en ny konto med en anden e-mailadresse.
Jeg oprettede en ny konto for to dage siden, og alt fungerede normalt. Jeg kunne endda foretage små udbetalinger uden problemer. Men i dag, da jeg forsøgte at hæve $400, blev min konto pludselig blokeret. I alt blev $500 konfiskeret - $400 fra udbetalingen og de resterende $100 på min saldo.
I løbet af dagen foretog jeg otte separate indbetalinger, som alle blev manuelt godkendt og krediteret af jeres supportmedarbejdere. Jeg blev på intet tidspunkt advaret om potentielle problemer eller overtrædelser. Selv hvis der var en eller anden form for brud (hvilket jeg er overbevist om, at der ikke var), burde jeg have været underrettet under indbetalingsprocessen – især da hver transaktion blev gennemgået og godkendt i realtid af jeres team.
Jeg prøvede at kontakte live chat support, delte alle relevante detaljer, men fik ikke tilbudt nogen hjælp. Nu, når jeg sender beskeder, vises supportpersonalet online, men ignorerer mig. Den eneste forklaring jeg fik på kontohandlingen var en vag henvisning til "Regel 3.2" uden yderligere afklaring.
Den eneste mulige grund, jeg kan komme i tanke om til denne handling, er, at jeg i går henviste min kone til TrustDice, efter at have set henvisningslinket og besluttet at prøve det. Hun registrerede sig og spillede kort, men hverken gjorde krav på eller brugte nogen bonusser – noget, jeg forstår, normalt er hovedårsagen til sådanne restriktioner. Der var ingen økonomisk gevinst, intet misbrug og ingen hensigt om at omgå systemet.
Vi er mere end villige til at fremvise vores ID og bevis på adresse for at bekræfte, at vi er to separate individer. Min kone og jeg har også separate konti på flere velrenommerede online casinoer, som ikke har noget problem med, at to personer fra samme husstand spiller uafhængigt af hinanden. Dette er en almindelig praksis i hele branchen og ikke noget, der generelt betragtes som en overtrædelse.
Jeg forstår, at jeres vilkår og betingelser kan begrænse flere konti fra samme husstand, men som spillere er det ikke altid muligt at læse alle klausuler igennem – især når der ikke er blevet brugt nogen bonus, og der ikke er opnået nogen urimelig fordel. Hvis denne situation opfattes som en overtrædelse, håber jeg inderligt, at den kan ses som en reel forsømmelse snarere end en forsætlig overtrædelse.
Jeg har kontaktet compliance-teamet igen og anmoder respektfuldt om en fair gennemgang af denne sag. Jeg har handlet i god tro og mener, at det er uretfærdigt at konfiskere de 500 dollars på min konto under disse omstændigheder.
Derudover vil jeg gerne fremhæve, at jeg i øjeblikket er i en økonomisk sårbar situation, og at saldoen på 500 dollars er et betydeligt beløb for mig. At få beløbet konfiskeret uden rimelig varsel har forårsaget mig betydelig nød. Jeg har handlet i god tro og håber, at denne sag kan gennemgås og løses retfærdigt.
I lost access to my old account some time ago and reached out to the compliance team for assistance. They responded and advised me to open a new account using a different email address.
I created a new account two days ago, and everything was functioning normally. I was even able to make small withdrawals without any issues. However, today when I attempted to withdraw $400, my account was suddenly blocked. In total, $500 was confiscated—$400 from the withdrawal and the remaining $100 in my balance.
Throughout the day, I made eight separate deposits, all of which were manually approved and credited by your support agents. At no point was I warned of any potential issues or violations. Even if there was some kind of breach (which I strongly believe there wasn’t), I should have been notified during the deposit process—especially since each transaction was reviewed and approved in real time by your team.
I tried reaching out to live chat support, shared all the relevant details, but was not offered any help. Now, when I send messages, support staff appear online but ignore me. The only explanation I was given for the account action was a vague reference to "Rule 3.2," with no further clarification.
The only possible reason I can think of for this action is that I referred my wife to join TrustDice yesterday after seeing the referral link and deciding to give it a try. She registered and played briefly, but did not claim or use any bonuses—something I understand is usually the main reason for such restrictions. There was no financial gain, no abuse, and no intent to bypass the system.
We are more than willing to provide our IDs and proof of address to verify that we are two separate individuals. My wife and I also have separate accounts on several reputable online casinos, which have no issue with two individuals from the same household playing independently. This is a common practice across the industry and not something that is generally considered a violation.
I understand that your terms and conditions may restrict multiple accounts from the same household, but as players, it's not always feasible to read through every clause—especially when no bonus was used, and no unfair advantage was taken. If this situation is being seen as a violation, I sincerely hope it can be viewed as a genuine oversight rather than an intentional breach.
I’ve contacted the compliance team again and respectfully request a fair review of this matter. I have acted in good faith and believe it is unjust to confiscate the $500 in my account under these circumstances.
Additionally, I want to highlight that I am currently in a financially vulnerable position, and the $500 balance is a significant amount for me. Having it confiscated without a fair warning has caused me considerable distress. I have acted in good faith and hope that this matter can be reviewed and resolved fairly.
Automatisk oversættelse: