Jeg indgiver denne klage vedrørende Winberry Casinos manglende hurtig behandling af mine gentagne anmodninger om selvudelukkelse/kontolukning.
Den 30. juli 2026 skrev jeg direkte til min VIP-repræsentant:
"Jeg er en ludoman, og jeg vil have kontoen lukket nu."
Jeg sagde også, at jeg gentagne gange havde bedt om lukning og ønskede kontoen permanent lukket. På trods af dette forblev min konto aktiv.
Winberrys egen support anerkendte senere, at jeg havde indsendt den samme anmodning flere gange og havde kontaktet dem gentagne gange. Jeg fulgte også op igen den 5. august og spurgte, hvorfor kontoen stadig ikke var blevet lukket.
Winberrys juridiske og compliance-afdeling bekræftede senere skriftligt, at:
Min konto blev ikke permanent blokeret før den 16. august 2026;
behandlingen af min anmodning om selvudelukkelse "tog længere tid end normalt forventet";
Mellem den 30. juli og den endelige blokering indbetalte jeg CAD 10.916 og hævede CAD 5.100, hvilket efterlod en nettoindbetaling på CAD 5.816.
Jeg havde allerede fremsat anmodning om kontolukning hos Winberry før den 30. juli, men jeg baserer mit krav om refusion på den 30. juli, fordi det er datoen for min utvetydige skriftlige anmodning om selvudelukkelse, hvori jeg anførte, at jeg var ludomanisk og ønskede kontoen lukket med det samme.
Jeg søger derfor refusion på 5.816 CAD, hvilket repræsenterer det nettobeløb, der blev indbetalt i den periode, hvor min anmodning om selvudelukkelse forblev ubehandlet.
Dette er ikke en klage over bonusser, RTP eller utilfredshed med spilleresultater. Problemet er, at jeg tydeligt havde anmodet om selvudelukkelse. Winberry anerkendte senere, at behandlingen var forsinket, og jeg kunne fortsat indbetale og spille indtil 16. august.
Winberry tilbød oprindeligt CAD $800 som et goodwill-forlig og øgede senere dette tilbud til CAD $1.300, begge på basis af et fuldt og endeligt forlig. Jeg afslog, fordi mit krav er på det fulde beløb på CAD $5.816.
Jeg har tidligere indbragt denne tvist gennem AskGamblers. Under den proces bad deres klageteam Winberry om at fremlægge detaljeret dokumentation for, at de havde overholdt deres politik for ansvarligt spil, og angav, at de, i mangel af sådan dokumentation, mente, at en fuld refusion var passende. Klagen blev i sidste ende afsluttet uafklaret.
Jeg har dokumentation, herunder min anmodning om selvudelukkelse den 30. juli, opfølgende anmodninger om lukning, Winberrys supportbekræftelser på, at jeg har indsendt anmodningen flere gange, Winberry Legal and Compliances indrømmelse af, at behandlingen tog længere tid end forventet, Winberrys egen transaktionsberegning, der fastslår nettobeløbet på CAD 5.816, samt AskGamblers klagehistorik og uafklarede udfald.
Ønsket løsning: Fuld refusion på 5.816 CAD.
Anmodning om beskyttelse af personlige oplysninger: De støttende dokumenter indeholder private personlige oplysninger. Jeg beder respektfuldt Casino Guru om kun at bruge dem til gennemgang af klager og ikke at offentliggøre dokumenterne eller skærmbillederne.
I am filing this complaint regarding Winberry Casino’s failure to promptly process my repeated self-exclusion/account closure requests.
On July 30, 2026, I wrote directly to my VIP representative:
"I am a compulsive gambler and I want the account closed now."
I also stated that I had repeatedly asked for closure and wanted the account permanently closed. Despite this, my account remained active.
Winberry’s own support later acknowledged that I had submitted the same request multiple times and had contacted them repeatedly. I also followed up again on August 5, asking why the account had still not been closed.
Winberry’s Legal and Compliance Department later confirmed in writing that:
my account was not permanently blocked until August 16, 2026;
the processing of my self-exclusion request "took longer than ordinarily expected";
between July 30 and the eventual block, I deposited CAD $10,916 and withdrew CAD $5,100, leaving net deposits of CAD $5,816.
I had already raised account closure with Winberry before July 30, but I am basing my refund claim on July 30 because that is the date of my unequivocal written self-exclusion request stating that I was a compulsive gambler and wanted the account closed immediately.
I am therefore seeking reimbursement of CAD $5,816, representing the net amount deposited during the period in which my self-exclusion request remained unprocessed.
This is not a complaint about bonuses, RTP, or dissatisfaction with gambling results. The issue is that I had clearly requested self-exclusion, Winberry later acknowledged that processing was delayed, and I remained able to deposit and gamble until August 16.
Winberry initially offered CAD $800 as a goodwill settlement and later increased that offer to CAD $1,300, both on a full-and-final settlement basis. I declined because my claim is for the full CAD $5,816.
I previously brought this dispute through AskGamblers. During that process, their Complaint Team asked Winberry to provide detailed evidence that it had honoured its Responsible Gambling policy and indicated that, failing such evidence, they believed a full refund was appropriate. The complaint ultimately closed unresolved.
I have supporting documentation including my July 30 self-exclusion request, follow-up closure requests, Winberry support acknowledgments that I had submitted the request multiple times, Winberry Legal and Compliance’s admission that processing took longer than expected, Winberry’s own transaction calculation establishing the CAD $5,816 net amount, and the AskGamblers complaint record and unresolved outcome.
Requested resolution: CAD $5,816 refund in full.
Privacy request: The supporting documents contain private personal information. I respectfully ask that Casino Guru use them only for complaint review and not publish the documents or screenshots publicly.
Automatisk oversættelse: